IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v18y2012i1p19-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective responsibility in the workplace from a capability perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bénédicte Zimmermann

    (CRIA - Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris)

Abstract

The article shows how a shift in perspective results from use of the capability approach in evaluating corporate activity: instead of a narrow focus on economic development, attention is paid also to the human development dimension. The author puts forward a conception of professional development resulting from the combined exercise of different capabilities, of which she discusses three essential dimensions, namely, freedom of choice, empowerment and collective responsibility. On the basis of a case study, she analyses the forms and founding principles of collective responsibility as related to individual capabilities. She describes how these factors impact on workplace participation procedures, and outlines the principles of justice that they entail. More broadly, she shows the tensions and new challenges to trade unionism and collective action thrown up by the need to combine individual and collective voice. L’article montre le déplacement de perspective qu’induit le recours à l’approche par les capacités pour évaluer l’activité des entreprises: du strict développement économique à la prise en compte du développement humain. L’auteure avance une conception du développement professionnel comme résultant de l’exercice conjoint de différentes capacités dont elle discute trois dimensions essentielles: la liberté de choisir, le pouvoir d’agir et la responsabilité collective. A partir d’une étude de cas, elle analyse les formes et les fondements de la responsabilité collective mise en jeu par les capacités individuelles. Elle en relève les conséquences sur les procédures de participation dans l’entreprise et les principes de justice mis en œuvre. Plus largement, elle montre les tensions et les nouveaux défis qui en résultent pour le syndicalisme et l’action collective en vue de combiner « voice » individuelle et collective. Der Beitrag beschreibt den Perspektivenwechsel, der sich aus der Verwendung des Ansatzes der Verwirklichungschancen für die Bewertung der Unternehmenstätigkeiten ergibt: Die Tätigkeit eines Unternehmens wird demnach nicht nur unter dem Gesichtspunkt der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, sondern auch der menschlichen Entwicklung bewertet. Die Autorin schlägt ein Konzept der beruflichen Entwicklung vor, das sich aus der gleichzeitigen Wahrnehmung verschiedener Verwirklichungschancen ergibt, und erörtert die drei wichtigsten Dimensionen dieser Chancen: Wahlfreiheit, Handlungsmöglichkeit und kollektive Verantwortung. Anhand einer Fallstudie werden die Formen und Grundlagen der kollektiven Verantwortung, die sich aus den individuellen Verwirklichungschancen ergibt, untersucht. Die Autorin erläutert die daraus resultierenden Folgen für die Partizipationsverfahren im Unternehmen sowie die Gerechtigkeitsprinzipien, die dabei angewandt werden. In einem weiteren Kontext ergeben sich daraus Spannungen und neue Herausforderungen für die Gewerkschaftsbewegung und kollektives Handeln, um individuelle und kollektive “Voice†miteinander zu verknüpfen.

Suggested Citation

  • Bénédicte Zimmermann, 2012. "Collective responsibility in the workplace from a capability perspective," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 18(1), pages 19-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:18:y:2012:i:1:p:19-30
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258911431195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258911431195
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258911431195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Des Gasper, 2002. "Is Sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 435-461.
    2. repec:ems:euriss:23177 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Sen, Amartya, 1973. "On Economic Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198281931, Decembrie.
    4. Gasper, D.R., 2002. "Is Sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development," ISS Working Papers - General Series 50674, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    5. Sen, Amartya, 1997. "Editorial: Human capital and human capability," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 1959-1961, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sung-Geun Kim, 2015. "Fuzzy Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: An Analysis of Statistical Behaviors," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 635-667, February.
    2. Antoinette Baujard & Muriel Gilardone, 2017. "Sen is not a capability theorist," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Agni Kalfagianni, 2014. "Addressing the Global Sustainability Challenge: The Potential and Pitfalls of Private Governance from the Perspective of Human Capabilities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 307-320, June.
    4. Marco Grasso & Enzo Di Giulio, 2003. "Mapping sustainable development in a capability perspective," HEW 0309001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Kuklys, W. & Robeyns, I., 2004. "Sen’s Capability Approach to Welfare Economics," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0415, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. Pelenc, Jérôme, 2014. "Combining the capability approach and Max-Neef’s needs approach for a better assessment of multidimensional well-being and inequalities: a case study perspective with vulnerable teenagers of the regio," MPRA Paper 66277, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Ballet, Jérôme & Marchand, Lucile & Pelenc, Jérôme & Vos, Robin, 2018. "Capabilities, Identity, Aspirations and Ecosystem Services: An Integrated Framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 21-28.
    8. Stefano Pareglio & Alessandro Vaglio & Marco Grasso & Stefania Migliavacca & Enzo Di Giulio, 2005. "Modelling sustainable human development in a capability perspective," Public Economics 0504008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Wei Liu & Jie Xu & Jie Li & Shuzhuo Li, 2019. "Rural Households’ Poverty and Relocation and Settlement: Evidence from Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Tara Natarajan, 2014. "Shifting economics: fundamental questions and Amartya K. Sen’s pragmatic humanism," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 8(1), November.
    11. AfDB AfDB, 2006. "Working Paper 83 - Are African Countries Richer Than They Are Developed? A Multidimensional Analysis of Well-Being," Working Paper Series 2297, African Development Bank.
    12. Lanzi, Diego, 2007. "Capabilities, human capital and education," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 424-435, June.
    13. Saeed, Muhammad Kashif & Hayat, Muhammad Azmat, 2020. "The Impact of Social Cash Transfers on Poverty in Pakistan-A Case Study of Benazir Income Support Programme," MPRA Paper 99805, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Antoinette Baujard & Muriel Gilardone, 2017. "Sen is not a capability theorist," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. David Clark, 2005. "Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1339-1368.
    16. Wiebke Kuklys & Ingrid Robeyns, 2004. "Sens's Capability Approach to Welfare Economics," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2004-03, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    17. AfDB AfDB, 2006. "Working Paper 83 - Are African Countries Richer Than They Are Developed? A Multidimensional Analysis of Well-Being," Working Paper Series 2217, African Development Bank.
    18. Hoque, Md. Rakibul, 2020. "The impact of the ICT4D project on sustainable rural development using a capability approach: Evidence from Bangladesh," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Pelenc, Jérôme, 2014. "Développement humain responsable et aménagement du territoire. Réflexions à partir de deux réserves de biosphère périurbaines en France et au Chili [Responsible Human Development and Land-Use Plann," MPRA Paper 56094, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Paul Shaffer, 2008. "New Thinking on Poverty: Implications for Globalisation and Poverty Reduction Strategies," Working Papers 65, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:18:y:2012:i:1:p:19-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.