IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221097919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triggers and Consequences of Awe in Online Brand Community

Author

Listed:
  • Jianbin Zhao
  • Zheng Li
  • Guobao Xiong

Abstract

As a common experience-based emotion, awe can easily arise within consumers who are immersed in an online brand community. On the basis of the awe prototype theory, this paper developed a research model involving community management authority, professionalism of opinion leaders, participation time, awe, and customer engagement at the organizational and individual levels of an online brand community. The study then targeted a mobile online brand community, obtaining 409 valid data points using a questionnaire survey platform (wjx.cn). The data were analyzed using a structural equation model, revealing that the management authority and the professionalism of opinion leaders positively affect community members’ awe, and this awe positively affects community engagement behaviors. Community members’ participation time negatively moderates the influence of management authority on awe; namely, longer participation time weakens such influence. In addition, community members’ participation time lowers the effect of opinion leaders’ professionalism on their awe, though not significantly. This research advances the study of online communities while also providing practical insights to managers and opinion leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianbin Zhao & Zheng Li & Guobao Xiong, 2022. "Triggers and Consequences of Awe in Online Brand Community," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221097919
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221097919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221097919
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221097919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Jitender & Nayak, Jogendra Kumar, 2018. "Brand community relationships transitioning into brand relationships: Mediating and moderating mechanisms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 64-73.
    2. Demiray, Melek & Burnaz, Sebnem, 2019. "Exploring the impact of brand community identification on Facebook: Firm-directed and self-directed drivers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 115-124.
    3. Rudd, Melanie & Vohs, Kathleen D. & Aaker, Jennifer, 2012. "Awe Expands People's Perception of Time, Alters Decision Making, and Enhances Well-Being," Research Papers 2095, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Yang, Yang & Gu, Yangjie & Galak, Jeff, 2016. "When It Could Have Been Worse, It Gets Better: How Favorable Uncertainty Resolution Slows Hedonic Adaptation," HEC Research Papers Series 1171, HEC Paris.
    5. Yan Yang & Jing Hu & Fengjie Jing & Bang Nguyen, 2018. "From Awe to Ecological Behavior: The Mediating Role of Connectedness to Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Septianto, Felix & Kemper, Joya A. & Choi, Jinyoung (Jane), 2020. "The power of beauty? The interactive effects of awe and online reviews on purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    7. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Shyam Gopinath & Sriram Venkataraman, 2010. "The Effects of Online User Reviews on Movie Box Office Performance: Accounting for Sequential Rollout and Aggregation Across Local Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 944-957, 09-10.
    8. Brodie, Roderick J. & Ilic, Ana & Juric, Biljana & Hollebeek, Linda, 2013. "Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blanca I. Hernández-Ortega & Michael A. Stanko & Rishika Rishika & Francisco-Jose Molina-Castillo & José Franco, 2022. "Brand-generated social media content and its differential impact on loyalty program members," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1071-1090, September.
    2. Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Andreini, Daniela & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2020. "Brand community integration, participation and commitment: A comparison between consumer-run and company-managed communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 481-494.
    3. Septianto, Felix & Ye, Sheng & Northey, Gavin, 2021. "The effectiveness of advertising images in promoting experiential offerings: An emotional response approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 344-352.
    4. Francisco J. Martínez-López & Rocío Aguilar-Illescas & Sebastián Molinillo & Rafael Anaya-Sánchez & J. Andres Coca-Stefaniak & Irene Esteban-Millat, 2021. "The Role of Online Brand Community Engagement on the Consumer–Brand Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Gligor, David & Bozkurt, Siddik, 2020. "FsQCA versus regression: The context of customer engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Liao, Junyun & Pang, Jiecong & Dong, Xuebing, 2023. "More gain, more give? The impact of brand community value on users’ value co-creation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Yang, Yan & Hu, Jing, 2021. "Self-diminishing effects of awe on consumer forgiveness in service encounters," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Katsifaraki, Georgia D. & Theodosiou, Marios, 2020. "How different (dis)engagement behaviors affect performance within an e-market ecosystem: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 578-591.
    9. Mukta Srivastava & Sreeram Sivaramakrishnan & Gordhan K. Saini, 2021. "The Relationship Between Electronic Word-of-Mouth and Consumer Engagement: An Exploratory Study," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(1), pages 66-81, January.
    10. Farmaki, Anna & Olya, Hossein & Taheri, Babak, 2021. "Unpacking the complex interactions among customers in online fan pages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 164-176.
    11. Rubin, Dan & Mohr, Iris & Kumar, V., 2022. "Beyond the box office: A conceptual framework for the drivers of audience engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 473-488.
    12. Miao Li & Ying Hua & Junxuan Zhu, 2021. "From Interactivity to Brand Preference: The Role of Social Comparison and Perceived Value in a Virtual Brand Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Wong, Amy & Lee, Marcus, 2022. "Building engagement in online brand communities: The effects of socially beneficial initiatives on collective social capital," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Kumar, Jitender & Kumar, Vikas, 2020. "Drivers of brand community engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    16. Muhammad Junaid & Khalid Hussain & Abdul Basit & Fujun Hou, 2020. "Nature of brand love: examining its variable effect on engagement and well-being," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 284-299, May.
    17. Nour El Houda Ben Amor & Mohamed Nabil Mzoughi, 2023. "Do Millennials’ Motives for Using Snapchat Influence the Effectiveness of Snap Ads?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    18. Shaheer, Noman Ahmed & Li, Sali, 2020. "The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in a virtual world," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    19. Minguez, Ana & Javier Sese, F., 2022. "Why do you want a relationship, anyway? Consent to receive marketing communications and donors’ willingness to engage with nonprofits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 356-367.
    20. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221097919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.