IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i1p2158244019899060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bariatric Biosociality: Pushed Together, Pulled Apart

Author

Listed:
  • Zoë C. Meleo-Erwin

Abstract

This article explores the postoperative experiences of weight loss surgery patients. More specifically, it investigates why bariatric patients seek out and form connection to similarly situated others in online and in-person support forums. Based on a thematic analysis of 30 semi-structured interviews with individuals who have had bariatric surgery, it is argued that the experience of having been medically classified as obese or severely obese, a long history of failed dieting attempts, fears of future morbidity and mortality, and then undergoing bariatric surgery serve as an axis around which some individuals interact, create identity, and form community. The perceived lack of postoperative support from home bariatric clinics, inadequate provider knowledge about the particularities of bariatric bodies, and the fact that patients must “work with†their surgeries to avoid postoperative adverse events are additional drivers for the formation of such bariatric kinship. It is argued that Paul Rabinow’s concept of “biosociality†provides a helpful theoretical frame for understanding these processes. However, just as the aforementioned factors push bariatric patients together, tensions around the type of bariatric procedure undergone, the amount of weight loss, and economic access to reconstructive plastic surgery cause conflict, leading to the formation of subgroups within bariatric communities. It is argued that, ultimately, bariatric biosocialities are spaces in which bariatric patients collectively work to achieve normative health and aesthetic standards. However, these spaces also reflect highly complex, sometimes divergent and conflictual, and often ambivalent frameworks of understanding and experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoë C. Meleo-Erwin, 2020. "Bariatric Biosociality: Pushed Together, Pulled Apart," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244019899060
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019899060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019899060
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019899060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puhl, R.M. & Heuer, C.A., 2010. "Obesity stigma: Important considerations for public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(6), pages 1019-1028.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peggy J. Liu & Kelly L. Haws & Karen Scherr & Joseph P. Redden & James R. Bettman & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2019. "The Primacy of “What” over “How Much”: How Type and Quantity Shape Healthiness Perceptions of Food Portions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3353-3381, July.
    2. Roose, Gudrun & Van Kerckhove, Anneleen & Huyghe, Elke, 2017. "Honey they shrank the food! An integrative study of the impact of food granularity and its operationalization mode on consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 210-220.
    3. Amin, Vikesh & Flores, Carlos A. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso, 2020. "The impact of BMI on mental health: Further evidence from genetic markers," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    4. Frederick, David A. & Saguy, Abigail C. & Gruys, Kjerstin, 2016. "Culture, health, and bigotry: How exposure to cultural accounts of fatness shape attitudes about health risk, health policies, and weight-based prejudice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 271-279.
    5. Boyoung Park & Ha Na Cho & Eunji Choi & Da Hea Seo & Sue Kim & Yeong-Ran Park & Kui Son Choi & Yumie Rhee, 2019. "Self-perceptions of body weight status according to age-groups among Korean women: A nationwide population-based survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Gerend, Mary A. & Stewart, Cylena & Wetzel, Karen, 2022. "Vulnerability and resilience to the harmful health consequences of weight discrimination in Black, Latina, and sexual minority women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    7. Katherine Sang & Jen Remnant & Thomas Calvard & Katriona Myhill, 2021. "Blood Work: Managing Menstruation, Menopause and Gynaecological Health Conditions in the Workplace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Li, Shaobo (Kevin) & Kokkoris, Michail D. & Savani, Krishna, 2020. "Does everyone have the potential to achieve their ideal body weight? Lay theories about body weight and support for price discrimination policies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 129-142.
    9. Yeeli Mui & Bruce Y. Lee & Atif Adam & Anna Y. Kharmats & Nadine Budd & Claudia Nau & Joel Gittelsohn, 2015. "Healthy versus Unhealthy Suppliers in Food Desert Neighborhoods: A Network Analysis of Corner Stores’ Food Supplier Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Sarah Louise Killeen & David F. Byrne & Aisling A. Geraghty & Cara A. Yelverton & Douwe van Sinderen & Paul D. Cotter & Eileen F. Murphy & Sharleen L. O’Reilly & Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, 2022. "Recruiting and Engaging Women of Reproductive Age with Obesity: Insights from A Mixed-Methods Study within A Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. David Berrigan & Ailing Liu & Britni R. Belcher & Ann Chao & Liwen Fang & Charles E. Matthews & Baohua Wang & Linhong Wang & Ning Wang & Yu Wang & Lichen Yang & Martha S. Linet & Nancy Potischman, 2020. "Physical Activity, Step Counts, and Grip Strength in the Chinese Children and Families Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Mooney, Stephen J. & El-Sayed, Abdulrahman M., 2016. "Stigma and the etiology of depression among the obese: An agent-based exploration," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-7.
    13. Briony Hill & Alexandra Azzari Wynn-Jones & Kimberley J. Botting & Emma H. Cassinelli & Michael P. Daly & Caitlin Victoria Gardiner & Stephanie J. Hanley & Nicola Heslehurst & Regine Steegers-Theuniss, 2023. "The Challenge of Weight Stigma for Women in the Preconception Period: Workshop Recommendations for Action from the 5th European Conference on Preconception Health and Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Sikorski, Claudia & Luppa, Melanie & Angermeyer, Matthias C. & Schomerus, Georg & Link, Bruce & Riedel-Heller, Steffi G., 2015. "The association of BMI and social distance towards obese individuals is mediated by sympathy and understanding," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 25-30.
    15. Niamh K Shortt & Esther Rind & Jamie Pearce & Richard Mitchell, 2014. "Integrating Environmental Justice and Socioecological Models of Health to Understand Population-Level Physical Activity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1479-1495, June.
    16. Robinovich, Jossiana & Ossa, Ximena & Baeza, Bernardita & Krumeich, Anja & van der Borne, Bart, 2018. "Embodiment of social roles and thinness as a form of capital: A qualitative approach towards understanding female obesity disparities in Chile," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 80-86.
    17. Zahra Mojtahedi & Shirin Farjadian, 2022. "Awareness of Obesity-Related Cancers: A Complex Issue," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-3, May.
    18. Giovana Santarosa Cassiano & Joana Pereira Carvalho-Ferreira & Nicola J. Buckland & Diogo Thimoteo da Cunha, 2021. "Do Registered Dietitians, Nutrition Students, and Laypeople Perceive Individuals with Obesity Differently?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Lily O’Hara & Jane Taylor, 2018. "What’s Wrong With the ‘War on Obesity?’ A Narrative Review of the Weight-Centered Health Paradigm and Development of the 3C Framework to Build Critical Competency for a Paradigm Shift," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, May.
    20. William R. Tebar & Gerson Ferrari & Jorge Mota & Ewerton P. Antunes & Beatriz A. S. Aguilar & Javier Brazo-Sayavera & Diego G. D. Christofaro, 2022. "Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors between Adolescents and Their Parents Is Mitigated by Parental Physical Activity—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244019899060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.