IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v53y2021i3p462-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Sector Reform and the Introduction of Neoliberal Capitalism in African Socialist States: The Case of Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Clever Madimutsa
  • Royd Malisase
  • Evans Daka
  • Moses Chewe

Abstract

Public sector reform (PSR) is believed to improve the performance of the public sector in particular and the economy in general by introducing market competition in service delivery. However, this paper shows that PSR uses a three-stage process to introduce neoliberal capitalism in African socialist states. The first stage dismantles the socialist state through strategies such as downsizing, decentralization, and privatization. The second stage introduces neoliberal capitalism in the former socialist state by removing government controls and allowing private sector actors to participate in economic activities. The third stage reconfigures the former socialist state into an agent of neoliberal capitalism. Ultimately, ordinary citizens are exploited and impoverished while private investors accumulate capital. JEL Classification: D73, P16, P33

Suggested Citation

  • Clever Madimutsa & Royd Malisase & Evans Daka & Moses Chewe, 2021. "Public Sector Reform and the Introduction of Neoliberal Capitalism in African Socialist States: The Case of Zambia," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 462-477, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:53:y:2021:i:3:p:462-477
    DOI: 10.1177/04866134211008188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/04866134211008188
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/04866134211008188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moses Khisa, 2019. "Whose Africa is rising?," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(160), pages 304-316, April.
    2. Stephen P. Osborne, 2006. "The New Public Governance?-super-1," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 377-387, September.
    3. Isaac Abotebuno Akolgo, 2018. "Afro-euphoria: is Ghana’s economy an exception to the growth paradox?," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(155), pages 146-157, January.
    4. Erik-Hans Klijn, 2008. "Governance and Governance Networks in Europe," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 505-525, July.
    5. Osama J. A. R. Abu Shair, 1997. "Privatization and Development," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-25374-6.
    6. Emmanuel Akyeampong, 2018. "African socialism; or, the search for an indigenous model of economic development?," Economic History of Developing Regions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 69-87, January.
    7. AfDB AfDB, 1997. "Working Paper 35 - Privatization of Public Enterprises in Zambia: An Evaluation of the Policies, Procedures and Experiences," Working Paper Series 2253, African Development Bank.
    8. Andrew Mwaba & Caleb Fundaga, 1997. "Working Paper 35 - Privatization of Public Enterprises in Zambia: An Evaluation of the Policies, Procedures and Experiences," Working Paper Series 169, African Development Bank.
    9. Ian Taylor, 2016. "Dependency redux: why Africa is not rising," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(147), pages 8-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Vers des écosystèmes de services gérontologiques ?," Post-Print hal-01164391, HAL.
    2. Bayliss, Kate & Pollen, Gabriel, 2021. "The power paradigm in practice: A critical review of developments in the Zambian electricity sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2016. "Gouverner sans les instruments ? La difficile construction des politiques relatives à la perte d'autonomie des personnes âgées," Post-Print hal-01258274, HAL.
    4. David Parker & Colin Kirkpatrick, 2005. "Privatisation in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and the Policy Lessons," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 513-541.
    5. Nathalie Brender & Bledi Yzeiraj & Florian Dupuy, 2017. "Risk and accountability: Drivers for change in network governance. The case of school restaurants governance in a Swiss city," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1384636-138, January.
    6. Josiah, Jairos & Burton, Bruce & Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim, 2010. "Accounting for privatisation in Africa? Reflections from a critical interdisciplinary perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 374-389.
    7. Sébastien Gand & Elvira Periac, 2015. "Concevoir l'instrumentation gestionnaire de la gouvernance territoriale de l'aide aux proches aidants de personnes âgées dépendantes," Post-Print hal-01148611, HAL.
    8. Craig, John, 2002. "Privatisation and Indigenous Ownership: Evidence from Africa," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30682, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    9. Grivas Chiyaba, 2021. "The components and determinants of FDI within firms: A case study of Zambia," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-09, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    10. Arndt, Channing & Benfica, Rui & Thurlow, James, 2011. "Gender Implications of Biofuels Expansion in Africa: The Case of Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1649-1662, September.
    11. M. Casari & M. Lisciandra, 2013. "Gender Discrimination in Property Rights," Working Papers wp914, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    12. Anastassios Gentzoglanis, 2002. "Privatization, Investment and Efficiency in the Telecommunications Industry: Theory and Empirical Evidence from MENA Countries," Working Papers 0230, Economic Research Forum, revised 10 Oct 2002.
    13. Aleksandra Maksimovska & Aleksandar Stojkov, 2019. "Composite Indicator of Social Responsiveness of Local Governments: An Empirical Mapping of the Networked Community Governance Paradigm," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 669-706, July.
    14. repec:dgr:rugsom:01a21 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Olga I. Timofeeva, 2022. "Methodology and Results of Measuring the Transparency of Russian Regional Budgets," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 44-58, December.
    16. Bezabih, Mintewab & Holden, Stein, 2010. "The Role of Land Certification in Reducing Gender Gaps in Productivity in Rural Ethiopia," RFF Working Paper Series dp-10-23-efd, Resources for the Future.
    17. Megginson, William Leon, 2005. "The Financial Economics of Privatization," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195150629.
    18. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    19. Bouquet, Emmanuelle, 2009. "State-Led Land Reform and Local Institutional Change: Land Titles, Land Markets and Tenure Security in Mexican Communities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1390-1399, August.
    20. John Nellis, 2003. "Privatization in Latin America," Working Papers 31, Center for Global Development.
    21. Diao, Xinshen & Roe, Terry & Doukkali, Rachid, 2002. "Economy-wide benefits from establishing water user-right markets in a spatially heterogeneous agricultural economy," TMD discussion papers 103, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public sector reform; African socialist state; neoliberal capitalism; exploitation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • P33 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - International Trade, Finance, Investment, Relations, and Aid

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:53:y:2021:i:3:p:462-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.