IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v48y2004i4p573-598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thai and U.S. Community Mediation

Author

Listed:
  • Ronda Roberts Callister

    (Department of Management and Human Resources, Utah State University)

  • James A. Wall Jr.

    (Department of Management, University of Missouri-Columbia)

Abstract

The approaches of 111 Thai and a matched set of 111 U.S. community mediators are investigated. Results show that Thai mediators are more apt to be assertive in their mediations; they put disputants together, demand concessions, criticize disputants, and threaten them more frequently than do U.S. mediators. Thai mediators more frequently seek harmony by asking disputants to forgive each other and to apologize.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronda Roberts Callister & James A. Wall Jr., 2004. "Thai and U.S. Community Mediation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(4), pages 573-598, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:48:y:2004:i:4:p:573-598
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002704265947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002704265947
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002704265947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Locke, Edwin A., 1991. "The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 288-299, December.
    2. Conlon, Donald E. & Carnevale, Peter J. & Murnighan, J. Keith, 1994. "Intravention: Third-Party Intervention with Clout," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 387-410, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James A. Wall Jr. & John B. Stark & Rhetta L. Standifer, 2001. "Mediation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(3), pages 370-391, June.
    2. Diana Hechavarria & Maija Renko & Charles Matthews, 2012. "The nascent entrepreneurship hub: goals, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and start-up outcomes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 685-701, October.
    3. Hunton, James E. & Gibson, Dana, 1999. "Soliciting user-input during the development of an accounting information system: investigating the efficacy of group discussion," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 597-618, October.
    4. Bottom, William P., 1998. "Negotiator Risk: Sources of Uncertainty and the Impact of Reference Points on Negotiated Agreements," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 89-112, November.
    5. D. Sandy Staples & John S. Hulland & Christopher A. Higgins, 1999. "A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 758-776, December.
    6. Ji-Hae Lee & Hye-Kyung Cho & Min-Jun Kim, 2022. "Does Self-Monitoring Influence Golfers? Analysis of Golf Tourism Using the Existence–Relatedness–Growth Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Chao-Yen Lin & Hsiao-Hsien Lin & Kuo-Chiang Ting & Chih-Chien Shen & Chih-Cheng Lo & Hsiu-Chu Hung & Li-Ju Tsai, 2023. "A Study on the Influence of Recreational Activities Intervening in Natural Science Courses on Learning Motivation and Learning Outcomes—The Case of Tabletop Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Song, Zhao & Guo, Hao & Jia, Danyang & Perc, Matjaž & Li, Xuelong & Wang, Zhen, 2021. "Third party interventions mitigate conflicts on interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 403(C).
    9. Cliff, Jennifer E., 1998. "Does one size fit all? exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 523-542, November.
    10. Bonner, Sarah E. & Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2002. "The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(4-5), pages 303-345.
    11. Chung-wen Chen & Hsiu-Huei Yu & Kristine Velasquez Tuliao & Aditya Simha & Yi-Ying Chang, 2021. "Supervisors’ Value Orientations and Ethics: A Cross-National Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 167-180, April.
    12. Anna Grandori, 2010. "A rational heuristic model of economic decision making," Rationality and Society, , vol. 22(4), pages 477-504, November.
    13. J. A. Wall & Suzanne Chan-Serafin & Timothy Dunne, 2012. "Mediator Pressing Techniques: A Theoretical Model of their Determinants," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 601-619, September.
    14. John Pearce, 2013. "Using Social Identity Theory to Predict Managers’ Emphases on Ethical and Legal Values in Judging Business Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 497-514, February.
    15. Mary Crossan & Daina Mazutis & Gerard Seijts, 2013. "In Search of Virtue: The Role of Virtues, Values and Character Strengths in Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(4), pages 567-581, April.
    16. James A. Wall Jr. & Daniel Druckman, 2003. "Mediation in Peacekeeping Missions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(5), pages 693-705, October.
    17. J. Travis Bland, 2018. "Frontline Participatory Behavior in Networks: Identity Work and the Corresponding Behavioral Determinations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 461-485, December.
    18. Kanfer, Ruth & Chen, Gilad, 2016. "Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 6-19.
    19. Carolina Prihandinisari & Azizur Rahman & John Hicks, 2020. "Developing an Explanatory Risk Management Model to Comprehend the Employees’ Intention to Leave Public Sector Organization," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Tasneem Fatima & Usman Raja & Muhammad Abdur Rahman Malik & Sadia Jahanzeb, 2020. "Leader–member exchange quality and employees job outcomes: a parallel mediation model," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(2), pages 309-332, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:48:y:2004:i:4:p:573-598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.