IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v36y1992i3p573-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Must We Fear a Post-Cold War Multipolar System?

Author

Listed:
  • Charles W. Kegley Jr.

    (University of South Carolina)

  • Gregory A. Raymond

    (Boise State University)

Abstract

The probable transition from a bipolar to a multipolar international system has inspired divergent predictions about the likely consequences for global stability. This article places two recent exemplary deductive models under examination, in order to evaluate the validity of their conclusions about the alleged stability of the cold war's bipolar competitive world relative to that of multipolar systems. A review of the empirical evidence generated by inductive investigations of this relationship suggests that acceptance of the pessimistic thesis that multipolar systems are inherently unstable would be premature, and that, if intervening variables are considered, a rival, more pacific image of a future multipolar world is equally plausible.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles W. Kegley Jr. & Gregory A. Raymond, 1992. "Must We Fear a Post-Cold War Multipolar System?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(3), pages 573-585, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:36:y:1992:i:3:p:573-585
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002792036003007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002792036003007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002792036003007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niou, Emerson M. S. & Ordeshook, Peter C., 1990. "Stability in Anarchic International Systems," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(4), pages 1207-1234, December.
    2. Hopf, Ted, 1991. "Polarity, the Offense-Defense Balance, and War," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(2), pages 475-493, June.
    3. Snidal, Duncan, 1991. "Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 701-726, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryan K. Ritchie, 2010. "Systemic Vulnerability and Sustainable Economic Growth," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13731.
    2. Pham Do, Kim Hang & Dinar, Ariel & McKinney, Daene, 2011. "Can issue linkage help mitigate externalities and enhance cooperation," MPRA Paper 37408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. R. Harrison Wagner, 2004. "Bargaining, War, and Alliances," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(3), pages 215-231, July.
    4. Sebastian Krapohl & Václav Ocelík & Dawid M. Walentek, 2021. "The instability of globalization: applying evolutionary game theory to global trade cooperation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 31-51, July.
    5. Marc L. Busch & Eric R. Reinhardt, 1993. "Nice Strategies in a World of Relative Gains," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(3), pages 427-445, September.
    6. Quan Li & Rafael Reuveny, 2007. "The Effects of Liberalism on the Terrestrial Environment," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(3), pages 219-238, July.
    7. Elena A. KOROSTELEVA, 2013. "Evaluating the role of partnership in the European Neighbourhood Policy: the Eastern neighbourhood," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4, pages 11-36, December.
    8. Gabriel Ciprian ANDRUSEAC & Gabriel Iulian HERTUG, 2015. "Theoretical Perspectives On Economic Cooperation," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(3), pages 675-681, September.
    9. Masoud Yazdanpanah & Michael Thompson & Dariush Hayati & Gholam Hosein Zamani, 2013. "A new enemy at the gate: Tackling Iran’s water super-crisis by way of a transition from government to governance," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 13(3), pages 177-194, July.
    10. de la Reza, German A., 1996. "Tides of change: Leadership and enlargement agreements," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 43-53.
    11. Nicholas Sambanis & Stergios Skaperdas & William Wohlforth, 2017. "External Intervention, Identity, and Civil War," Working Papers 161705, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
    12. Stephen Biddle & Stephen Long, 2004. "Democracy and Military Effectiveness," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(4), pages 525-546, August.
    13. Kangsik Choi & Yuanzhu Lu, 2009. "A Model Of Endogenous Payoff Motives And Endogenous Timing In A Mixed Duopoly," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 203-223, September.
    14. Zeino-Mahmalat, Ellinor, 2008. "Gain Seeking in a "Double Security Dilemma": The Case of OPEC," GIGA Working Papers 71, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    15. James S. Mosher, 2003. "Relative Gains Concerns when the Number of States in the International System Increases," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(5), pages 642-668, October.
    16. Sirirat Ngamsang, 2013. "Confucius Institutes as Instruments of Soft Power: Comparison with International Rivals," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(10).
    17. Eguia, Jon X., 2022. "Multilateral regime change," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
    19. John Robst & Solomon Polachek & Yuan-Ching Chang, 2007. "Geographic Proximity, Trade, and International Conflict/Cooperation," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(1), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Gary Bornstein & Danny Mingelgrin & Christel Rutte, 1996. "The Effects of Within-Group Communication on Group Decision and Individual Choice in the Assurance and Chicken Team Games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 486-501, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:36:y:1992:i:3:p:573-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.