IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v15y1991i3p364-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Contextual Variables in Evaluation Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Linnea L. Jatulis

    (Russell Sage College)

  • Dianna L. Newman

    (University at Albany, State University of New York)

Abstract

This experimental study examined the interactions of potential loss, time, and self-efficacy of the program manager on need for information in an evaluation decision. The theoretical framework was provided by Janis and Mann's conflict decision-making model and by self-efficacy theory. The sample consisted of 259 managers of home health agencies in New York State. Results showed a significant three-way interaction on both sources and types of information. Managers with high self-efficacy needed less information in situations of high potential loss and inadequate time; managers with low self-efficacy needed more information in these situations regardless of time.

Suggested Citation

  • Linnea L. Jatulis & Dianna L. Newman, 1991. "The Role of Contextual Variables in Evaluation Decision Making," Evaluation Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 364-377, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:15:y:1991:i:3:p:364-377
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9101500304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9101500304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9101500304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothstein, Howard G., 1986. "The effects of time pressure on judgment in multiple cue probability learning," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 83-92, February.
    2. Pflum, Glenn D. & Brown, Robert D., 1984. "The effects of conflict, quality, and time on small group information use and behavior in evaluative decision making situations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 35-43, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiang Lin & Kathleen Carley, 1993. "Proactive or Reactive: An Analysis of the Effect of Agent Style on Organizational Decision‐making Performance," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 271-287, December.
    2. Sengupta, K., 1995. "Cognitive feedback in environments characterized by irrelevant information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 125-143, April.
    3. Anders Poulsen & Axel Sonntag, 2019. "Focality is Intuitive - Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Time Pressure in Coordination Games," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 19-01, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    4. Chu, P. C. & Spires, Eric E., 2001. "Does Time Constraint on Users Negate the Efficacy of Decision Support Systems?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 226-249, July.
    5. Robin Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2006. "On heuristic and linear models of judgment: Mapping the demand for knowledge," Economics Working Papers 974, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    6. Kubilay Gok & Nuray Atsan, 2016. "Decision-Making under Stress and Its Implications for Managerial Decision-Making: A Review of Literature," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(3), pages 38-47, March.
    7. Kubilay Gok & Nuray Atsan, 2016. "Decision-Making under Stress and Its Implications for Managerial Decision-Making: A Review of Literature," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(3), pages 38-47, March.
    8. Chang, Y.H.J. & Mosleh, A., 2007. "Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(8), pages 1061-1075.
    9. Robert D. Brown & David G. Prentice, 1987. "Assessing Decision-Making Risk and Information Needs in Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 11(3), pages 371-381, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:15:y:1991:i:3:p:364-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.