IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v41y2023i3p448-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marketisation policies in the neoliberal era: How culture and governance structures affect the introduction of market principles in local care policies

Author

Listed:
  • Ralf Och
  • Birgit Pfau-Effinger

Abstract

Confronted with the problem of ageing populations since the 1990s, many European welfare states have massively expanded public support for the care of the elderly. This expansion occurred during the neoliberal era in which the marketisation of social services was high on European countries’ political agendas. There are many studies concerned with cross-national differences between national policies regarding the marketisation of care, but little comparative research has been carried out at the local level. This article is innovative in that it explores the role of welfare cultures and local governance structures in local policies regarding the marketisation of long-term care (LTC). We present the findings of a historical comparative case study of four medium-sized cities in Germany for the period 1995–2007. Our empirical study took a multi-level approach to exploring the extent to which the central German state affords local governments operational autonomy for LTC marketization, then analysed the differences in local policies regarding LTC marketisation. According to our findings, German LTC policies are rather centralised and afford local governments operational autonomy towards marketisation only in a few fields. In these fields, local LTC policies differ substantially between eastern and western German cities. We find that differences in the relevant political actors’ main cultural ideas and in local governance structures contribute to this variation, whereas the financial and demographic differences that were analysed do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralf Och & Birgit Pfau-Effinger, 2023. "Marketisation policies in the neoliberal era: How culture and governance structures affect the introduction of market principles in local care policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 448-465, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:3:p:448-465
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544221137959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544221137959
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544221137959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James P. Allan & Lyle Scruggs, 2004. "Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 496-512, July.
    2. Immergut, Ellen M., 1990. "Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care ," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 391-416, October.
    3. Hibbs, Douglas A., 1977. "Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 1467-1487, December.
    4. Edith Archambault & Eckhart Priller & Annette Zimmer, 2014. "European Civil Societies Compared: Typically German-Typically French?," Post-Print halshs-00797886, HAL.
    5. Edith Archambault & Eckhart Priller & Annette Zimmer, 2014. "European Civil Societies Compared: Typically German-Typically French?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00797886, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edith Archambault, 2017. "The Evolution of Public Service Provision by the Third Sector in France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01598959, HAL.
    2. Andrea Ceron & Luigi Curini & Fedra Negri, 2019. "Intra-party politics and interest groups: missing links in explaining government effectiveness," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 407-427, September.
    3. Bergh, Andreas & Dackehag, Margareta & Rode, Martin, 2017. "Are OECD policy recommendations for public sector reform biased against welfare states? Evidence from a new database," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 3-15.
    4. Niklas Potrafke, 2012. "Is German domestic social policy politically controversial?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 393-418, December.
    5. Patrick Lunz, 2013. "What's left of the left? Partisanship and the political economy of labour market reform: why has the social democratic party in Germany liberalised labour markets?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 65, European Institute, LSE.
    6. Patrick Lunz, 2013. "What's left of the left? Partisanship and the political economy of labour market reform: why has the social democratic party in Germany liberalised labour markets?," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 5, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    7. Potrafke, Niklas, 2017. "Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 712-750.
    8. Georg Wenzelburger & Pascal D. König & Frieder Wolf, 2019. "Policy Theories in Hard Times? Assessing the Explanatory Power of Policy Theories in the Context of Crisis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 97-118, March.
    9. Ha, Eunyoung & Kang, Myung-koo, 2015. "Government Policy Responses to Financial Crises: Identifying Patterns and Policy Origins in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 264-281.
    10. Birgit Pfau-Effinger & Marcel Sebastian, 2022. "Institutional persistence despite cultural change: a historical case study of the re-categorization of dogs in Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 473-485, March.
    11. Christian Adam & Christoph Knill & Xavier Fernandez-i-Marín, 2017. "Rule growth and government effectiveness: why it takes the capacity to learn and coordinate to constrain rule growth," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 241-268, June.
    12. Edith Archambault, 2017. "The Evolution of Public Service Provision by the Third Sector in France," Post-Print halshs-01598959, HAL.
    13. Lohmann, Susanne, 1997. "Partisan control of the money supply and decentralized appointment powers," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 225-246, May.
    14. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    15. Rodrigo M. S. Moita & Claudio Paiva, 2013. "Political Price Cycles in Regulated Industries: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 94-121, February.
    16. Fritz Sager & Yvan Rielle, 2013. "Sorting through the garbage can: under what conditions do governments adopt policy programs?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Heshmati Almas & Karlson Nils & Box Marcus, 2013. "Generality, State Neutrality and Unemployment in the OECD," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3-4), pages 333-358, December.
    18. Blomberg, S. Brock & Hess, Gregory D., 2003. "Is the political business cycle for real?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(5-6), pages 1091-1121, May.
    19. Silvia Dominguez-Martinez & Otto Swank, 2006. "Polarization, Information Collection and Electoral Control," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 26(3), pages 527-545, June.
    20. Daniele, Gianmarco & Geys, Benny, 2012. "Public support for institutionalised solidarity: Europeans' reaction to the establishment of eurobonds," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship & Project "The Future of Fiscal Federalism" SP II 2012-112, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:3:p:448-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.