IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v6y1974i2p191-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Derivation of Optimal Spatial Prices

Author

Listed:
  • M L Greenhut

    (Department of Economics, Texas A and M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA)

  • H Ohta

    (Department of Economics, Aoyama-Gakuin University, Shibaya-Ku, Tokyo 150, Japan)

  • J Greenhut

    (Department of Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA)

Abstract

The price of a good prevailing at some local market point may or may not be identical to the price of that same good at another market point. Price differentials over regions depend in part upon the number and locations of firms which sell to these regions, and on the demand curves of buyers. The present paper evaluates the price policy of a firm selling over a set of linearly extended buying points. It derives the optimal spatial prices under alternative assumptions of consumer behavior and demand. It demonstrates mathematically as well as graphically that a spatial monopolist maximizes profits by subdividing his market into economic submarkets, utilizing fob mill prices for some submarkets, and optimal discriminatory prices for the remaining ones. Thus it explains the use of fob pricing over selected distances in a firm's market area notwithstanding the apparently greater profitability of a discriminatory price policy throughout a firm's market space.

Suggested Citation

  • M L Greenhut & H Ohta & J Greenhut, 1974. "Derivation of Optimal Spatial Prices," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 6(2), pages 191-198, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:6:y:1974:i:2:p:191-198
    DOI: 10.1068/a060191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a060191
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a060191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenhut, M L & Ohta, H, 1972. "Monopoly Output Under Alternative Spatial Pricing Techniques," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 705-713, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hueth, Brent & Taylor, Christopher W., 2013. "Spatial Competition in Agricultural Markets: A Discrete-Choice Approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150506, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Shin‐kun Peng, 2004. "Spatial Monopoly with Product Differentiation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(3), pages 646-660, January.
    3. Pu-Yan Nie, 2013. "Innovation Under Spatial Duopoly," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(4), pages 474-486.
    4. Anam, Mahmudul & Chiang, Shin-Hwan, 2006. "Price discrimination and social welfare with correlated demand," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 110-122, September.
    5. Jen-Te Yao, 2019. "The impact of transportation asymmetry on the choice of a spatial price policy," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 793-811, October.
    6. Ziying Yang & Félix Muñoz-García, 2018. "Can Banning Spatial Price Discrimination Improve Social Welfare?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 223-243, June.
    7. Hong Hwang & Chao‐Cheng Mai & Hiroshi Ohta, 2010. "Who Benefits From Pricing Regulations When Economic Space Matters?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 218-233, June.
    8. Sesmero Juan, 2018. "Spatial Pricing in Uncontested Procurement Markets: Regulatory Implications," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Carlo Reggiani, "undated". "Optimal Differentiation and Spatial Competition: The Spokes Model with Product Delivery," Discussion Papers 09/13, Department of Economics, University of York.
    10. Lin-Ti Tan & Yan-Shu Lin, 2005. "Spatial Monopoly Pricing in a Stochastic Environment," IEAS Working Paper : academic research 05-A004, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
    11. Cyrus Chu, C. Y. & Lu, Huei-chung, 1998. "The multi-store location and pricing decisions of a spatial monopoly," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 255-281, May.
    12. Chin-Sheng Chen & Hong Hwang, 2014. "Spatial Price Discrimination in Input Markets with an Endogenous Market Boundary," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 45(2), pages 139-152, September.
    13. repec:bla:jregsc:v:44:y:2004:i:3:p:489-515:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Cheung, Francis K. & Wang, Xinghe, 1995. "Spatial price discrimination and location choice with non-uniform demands," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 59-73, February.
    15. Mengying Xue & Long He, 2020. "Spatial pricing and product allocation in online retailing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 670-684, December.
    16. Konstantinos Eleftheriou & Nickolas J. Michelacakis, 2020. "Location decisions and welfare under spatial price discrimination," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1202-1210, October.
    17. Mark Burkey, 2011. "Spatial pricing models with lumpy transportation costs: the case for travel cost subsidization," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 197-206, October.
    18. Wen-Chung Guo & Fu-Chuan Lai, 2013. "The role of an intermediate market within the barbell model," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 151-161, November.
    19. Gerking, Shelby & Hamilton, Stephen F., 2010. "SO2 policy and input substitution under spatial monopoly," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 327-340, August.
    20. Victor Kaftal & Debashis Pal, 2008. "Third Degree Price Discrimination in Linear‐Demand Markets: Effects on Number of Markets Served and Social Welfare," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 75(2), pages 558-573, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:6:y:1974:i:2:p:191-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.