IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v32y2000i5p817-832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Transportation – Production Tradeoff in the Regional Environmental Impact of Industrial Systems: A Case Study in the Paper Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Francis M Vanek

    (University of Pennsylvania, Department of Systems Engineering, 293 Towne Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315, USA)

Abstract

The author presents a methodology which is used first to model a product-manufacturing-and-distribution system, and then to predict the resulting changes in environmental impact from changes either in taxation or in costs of inputs. A case study of the paper sector in the eastern and central United States is developed, derived from the 1993 US Commodity Flow Survey. From an analysis of five scenarios, two central findings arise: (1) the model is found to be unresponsive to even large changes in transport taxation, so an environmental policy which considers both transportation and production aspects at the same time is favored, and (2) fluctuations in raw-material costs can have an influence on environmental impact as great as or greater than that of changes in taxation levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis M Vanek, 2000. "The Transportation – Production Tradeoff in the Regional Environmental Impact of Industrial Systems: A Case Study in the Paper Sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(5), pages 817-832, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:5:p:817-832
    DOI: 10.1068/a31184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a31184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a31184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M. & Van Wassenhove, L. N. & Gabel, H. L. & Weaver, P. M., 1996. "An environmental life cycle optimization model for the European pulp and paper industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 615-629, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Xiaoguang & Zhou, Yanhui, 2015. "Designing a multi-echelon reverse logistics operation and network: A case study of office paper in Beijing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 58-69.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael W. Toffel & Antoinette Stein & Katharine L. Lee, 2008. "Extending Producer Responsibility: An Evaluation Framework for Product Take-Back Policies," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-026, Harvard Business School.
    2. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    3. Frota Neto, J. Quariguasi & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & van Heck, E., 2008. "Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 195-208, February.
    4. Xu, Jiuping & Li, Zongmin, 2012. "A review on Ecological Engineering based Engineering Management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 368-378.
    5. Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. & Walther, G. & Bloemhof, J. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Spengler, T., 2009. "A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 670-682, March.
    6. Jena, Sarat Kumar & Sarmah, S.P., 2016. "Price and service co-opetiton under uncertain demand and condition of used items in a remanufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1-21.
    7. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Vroom, J. & van der Linden, A., 2001. "One and Two Way Packaging in the Dairy Sector," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-58-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Harris, Irina & Mumford, Christine L. & Naim, Mohamed M., 2014. "A hybrid multi-objective approach to capacitated facility location with flexible store allocation for green logistics modeling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-22.
    9. Jianxiong Chen & Chung-Cheng Yang, 2021. "Competitive Revenue Strategies in the Medical Consumables Industry: Evidence from Human Resources, Research and Development Expenses and Industry Life Cycle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Tognetti, Alice & Grosse-Ruyken, Pan Theo & Wagner, Stephan M., 2015. "Green supply chain network optimization and the trade-off between environmental and economic objectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 385-392.
    11. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.
    12. Zoeteman, B.C.J. & Krikke, H.R. & Venselaar, J., 2010. "Handling WEEE waste flows : On the effectiveness of producer responsibility in a globalizing world," Other publications TiSEM cb6af1f5-e6b7-4cea-953e-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Ioannis E. Nikolaou & Konstantinos I. Evangelinos, 2010. "Classifying current social responsibility accounting methods for assisting a dialogue between business and society," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(4), pages 562-580, October.
    14. Gamberini, Rita & Gebennini, Elisa & Manzini, Riccardo & Ziveri, Andrea, 2010. "On the integration of planning and environmental impact assessment for a WEEE transportation network—A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 937-951.
    15. A.J.D. Lambert & H.M. Boelaarts & M.A.M. Splinter, 2004. "Optimal Recycling System Design: With an Application to Sophisticated Packaging Tools," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 28(3), pages 273-299, July.
    16. V. Daniel R. Guide & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2009. "OR FORUM---The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 10-18, February.
    17. Ioannis Nikolaou & Konstantinos Evangelinos, 2012. "Financial and non-financial environmental information: significant factors for corporate environmental performance measuring," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 61-77.
    18. Pati, Rupesh Kumar & Vrat, Prem & Kumar, Pradeep, 2006. "Economic analysis of paper recycling vis-a-vis wood as raw material," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 489-508, October.
    19. Martí, Joana M. Comas & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien & Seifert, Ralf W., 2015. "Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 129-142.
    20. Krikke, H.R. & Zuidwijk, R., 2008. "Disposition Choices Based on Energy Footprints instead of Recovery Quota," Other publications TiSEM e8654e2a-9cf2-4d88-aa83-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:5:p:817-832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.