IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v27y1995i12p1931-1960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multiple Criteria Location Problem: 1. A Generalized Network Model and the Set of Efficient Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • J Malczewski

    (Department of Geography, The University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5C2, Canada)

  • W Ogryczak

    (Department of Mathematics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

This is the first of two papers in which multiple criteria location problems (MCLPs) are discussed. In this paper the main aim is to formalize a discrete MCLP and to develop a generalized network model. A critical overview of various techniques for generating efficient solutions to multiple criteria decision problems is offered. The three most commonly used methods for tackling MCLPs, namely the weighted method, the noninferior set estimation method, and the constraint method, are discussed. The main purpose of the generating techniques is to determine an exact representation of or an approximation to the set of efficient solutions among which one can choose the best or most preferred solution (location plan). To identify the best solution some information about the decisionmaker's preferences or a decision rule is needed. Consequently, in paper 2 we focus on preference-based approaches to multiple criteria decisionmaking and relate them to the concept of interactive decision support. Specifically, optimizing decision rules (utility-function-based approaches) and satisficing decision rules (goal programming methods) are discussed. Advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches to solving the MCLP are highlighted. It is suggested that the utility-maximizing and satisficing decision rules are not mutually exclusive. Accordingly, a quasi-satisficing approach that merges these two decision rules is proposed. Also, a framework for an interactive decision support system (DSS) for tackling MCLPs is presented. The system incorporates the generalized network model into a quasi-satisficing approach. It is argued that the DSS data and analytical components can be effectively integrated by means of the interactive decision support concept which allows for exploring the problem and the alternative solutions both in decision space and in criterion outcome space.

Suggested Citation

  • J Malczewski & W Ogryczak, 1995. "The Multiple Criteria Location Problem: 1. A Generalized Network Model and the Set of Efficient Solutions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(12), pages 1931-1960, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:12:p:1931-1960
    DOI: 10.1068/a271931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a271931
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a271931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Czamanski, Daniel Z., 1981. "Some considerations concerning industrial location decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 227-231, February.
    2. G. Terry Ross & Richard M. Soland, 1977. "Modeling Facility Location Problems as Generalized Assignment Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 345-357, November.
    3. Kok, Matthijs, 1986. "The interface with decision makers and some experimental results in interactive multiple objective programming methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 96-107, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inés Santé Riveira & Rafael Crecente Maseda, 2006. "A Review of Rural Land-Use Planning Models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(2), pages 165-183, April.
    2. H. Murat Çelik & Ersin Türk, 2010. "Determination of Optimum Environmental Conservation: Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 479-499, March.
    3. David Kik & Matthias Gerhard Wichmann & Thomas Stefan Spengler, 2022. "Decision support framework for the regional facility location and development planning problem," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 115-157, January.
    4. Roberta Mele & Giuliano Poli, 2017. "The Effectiveness of Geographical Data in Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Landscape Services †," Data, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Berman, Oded & Hajizadeh, Iman & Krass, Dmitry & Rahimi-Vahed, Alireza, 2018. "Reconfiguring a set of coverage-providing facilities under travel time uncertainty," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E L Hillsman, 1984. "The p-Median Structure as a Unified Linear Model for Location—Allocation Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 16(3), pages 305-318, March.
    2. Zheng, Feifeng & Cheng, Yongxi & Xu, Yinfeng & Liu, Ming, 2013. "Competitive strategies for an online generalized assignment problem with a service consecution constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 59-66.
    3. Amini, Mohammad M. & Racer, Michael & Ghandforoush, Parviz, 1998. "Heuristic sensitivity analysis in a combinatoric environment: An exposition and case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 604-617, August.
    4. Robert M. Nauss, 2003. "Solving the Generalized Assignment Problem: An Optimizing and Heuristic Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 249-266, August.
    5. Drexl, Andreas & Jørnsten, Kurt, 2007. "Pricing the generalized assignment problem," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 627, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Solomon, Anthony & Wishart, Nicole & Dublish, Sandipa, 1998. "Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 507-529, June.
    7. J R Current & J E Storbeck, 1988. "Capacitated Covering Models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 15(2), pages 153-163, June.
    8. Albareda-Sambola, Maria & Vlerk, Maarten H. van der & Fernandez, Elena, 2002. "Exact solutions to a class of stochastic generalized assignment problems," Research Report 02A11, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    9. Aksoy, Yasemin & Butler, Timothy W. & Minor, Elliott D., 1996. "Comparative studies in interactive multiple objective mathematical programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 408-422, March.
    10. repec:dgr:rugsom:02a11 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Michael A. Trick, 1992. "A linear relaxation heuristic for the generalized assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 137-151, March.
    12. Jeet, V. & Kutanoglu, E., 2007. "Lagrangian relaxation guided problem space search heuristics for generalized assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1039-1056, November.
    13. Montlaur, Adeline & Delgado, Luis & Prats, Xavier, 2023. "Domain-driven multiple-criteria decision-making for flight crew decision support tool," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Lin, Edward Y. H. & Bricker, Dennis L., 1996. "Computational comparison on the partitioning strategies in multiple choice integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 182-202, January.
    15. Candi Clouse & Ashutosh Dixit & Nazli Turken, 2020. "The role of place image for business site selection: a research framework, propositions, and a case study," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(2), pages 174-186, June.
    16. Haddadi, Salim & Ouzia, Hacene, 2004. "Effective algorithm and heuristic for the generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 184-190, February.
    17. Özlem Karsu & Meral Azizoğlu, 2014. "Bicriteria multiresource generalized assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(8), pages 621-636, December.
    18. Martello, Silvano & Toth, Paolo, 1995. "The bottleneck generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 621-638, June.
    19. Shtub, Avraham & Kogan, Konstantin, 1998. "Capacity planning by the dynamic multi-resource generalized assignment problem (DMRGAP)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 91-99, February.
    20. Yurimoto, Shigeru & Masui, Tadayuki, 1995. "Design of a decision support system for overseas plant location in the EC," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 411-418, October.
    21. Christian Haket & Bo van der Rhee & Jacques de Swart, 2020. "Saving Time and Money and Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Efficiently Allocating Customers," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 153-165, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:12:p:1931-1960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.