IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v23y2022i1p66-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Together we stand? Transnational solidarity in the EU in times of crises

Author

Listed:
  • Alexia Katsanidou

    (Survey Data Curation, GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany
    Institute for Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Germany)

  • Ann-Kathrin Reinl

    (9183Geschwister-Scholl-Institute, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany)

  • Christina Eder

    (Survey Data Curation, GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany)

Abstract

After more than a decade of consecutive crises, the issue of transnational solidarity is becoming increasingly relevant for the European Union. This research note compares the current coronavirus disease-2019 crisis to previous ones and investigates the willingness of European Union citizens to show solidarity towards fellow member states. We test the influence of socio-political attitudes of citizens on solidarity preferences in three crisis scenarios. We analyse Greece and Germany as cases differently affected by the past decade's crises and cases that chose different crisis management strategies when facing the novel virus. Our findings indicate that solidarity is highest in a pandemic, while for all crisis scenarios it is higher in Greece than in Germany. Despite variations in the degree of solidarity associated relationships with socio-political attitudes remain consistent.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexia Katsanidou & Ann-Kathrin Reinl & Christina Eder, 2022. "Together we stand? Transnational solidarity in the EU in times of crises," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 66-78, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:66-78
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165211035663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165211035663
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165211035663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eiko Thielemann, 2018. "Why Refugee Burden†Sharing Initiatives Fail: Public Goods, Free†Riding and Symbolic Solidarity in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 63-82, January.
    2. Timothy J. Hatton, 2015. "Asylum Policy in the EU: the Case for Deeper Integration," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 61(3-4), pages 605-637.
    3. Sharon Baute & Koen Abts & Bart Meuleman, 2019. "Public Support for European Solidarity: Between Euroscepticism and EU Agenda Preferences?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 533-550, May.
    4. Anniek de Ruijter & Roel Beetsma & Brian Burgoon & Francesco Nicoli & Frank Vandenbroucke, 2020. "EU Solidarity and Policy in Fighting Infectious Diseases: State of Play, Obstacles, Citizen Preferences and Ways Forward," CESifo Working Paper Series 8222, CESifo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicoli, Francesco & van der Duin, David & Burgoon, Brian, 2023. "Which Energy Security Union? An experiment on public preferences for energy union alternatives in 5 western European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Keita, Kady & Rabaud, Isabelle & Turcu, Camelia, 2023. "Fiscal outcomes, current account imbalances, and institutions in Europe: Exploring nonlinearities," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 121-134.
    3. Ann-Kathrin Reinl & Daniela Braun, 2023. "Who holds the union together? Citizens’ preferences for European Union cohesion in challenging times," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 390-409, June.
    4. Angela Chang & Xuechang Xian & Matthew Tingchi Liu & Xinshu Zhao, 2022. "Health Communication through Positive and Solidarity Messages Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Automated Content Analysis of Facebook Uses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Alessandro Pellegata & Francesco Visconti, 2022. "Voting for a social Europe? European solidarity and voting behaviour in the 2019 European elections," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 79-99, March.
    6. Catherine E De Vries, 2022. "Analysing how crises shape mass and elite preferences and behaviour in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 161-168, March.
    7. Daniela Braun & Constantin Schäfer, 2022. "Issues that mobilize Europe. The role of key policy issues for voter turnout in the 2019 European Parliament election," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 120-140, March.
    8. Wouter van der Brug & Katjana Gattermann & Claes H. de Vreese, 2022. "Electoral responses to the increased contestation over European integration. The European Elections of 2019 and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniele Archibugi & Marco Cellini & Mattia Vitiello, 2019. "Refugees in the European Union: from emergency alarmism to common management," Management Working Papers 17, Birkbeck Department of Management, revised Feb 2021.
    2. Philipp Lutz & David Kaufmann & Anna Stünzi, 2020. "Humanitarian Protection as a European Public Good: The Strategic Role of States and Refugees," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 757-775, May.
    3. Amelie F. Constant & Klaus F. Zimmermann, 2017. "Towards a New European Refugee Policy that Works," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(4), pages 03-08, 02.
    4. repec:ces:ifodic:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:19271452 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Azarnert, Leonid V., 2018. "Refugee resettlement, redistribution and growth," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 89-98.
    6. Jesús Fernández-Huertas Moraga & Hillel Rapoport, 2015. "Tradable Refugee-admission Quotas and EU Asylum Policy," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 61(3-4), pages 638-672.
    7. Veshi Denard, 2020. "The EU Regulatory Competition in Asylum Law," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 19-30, June.
    8. Hillel Rapoport & Jesús Fernández-Huertas Moraga, 2014. "Tradable Refugee-admission Quotas: a Policy Proposal to Reform the EU Asylum Policy," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/101, European University Institute.
    9. Timothy J. Hatton, 2016. "Uchodźcy, azylanci i polityka krajów OECD," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 6, pages 155-163.
    10. Hatton, Tim & Moloney, Joe, 2015. "Applications for Asylum in the Developed World: Modelling Asylum Claims by Origin and Destination," CEPR Discussion Papers 10678, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Jesús Fernández-Huertas Moraga & Hillel Rapoport, 2015. "Tradable Refugee-Admission Quotas, Matching and the New European Agenda for Migration," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(02), pages 50-56, August.
    12. Ademmer, Esther & Akgüç, Mehtap & Barslund, Mikkel & Di Bartolomeo, Anna & Benček, David & Groll, Dominik & Hoxhaj, Rezart & Lanati, Mauro & Laurentsyeva, Nadzeya & Lücke, Matthias & Ludolph, Lars & R, 2017. "2017 MEDAM Assessment Report on Asylum and Migration Policies in Europe. Sharing responsibility for refugees and expanding legal immigration," MEDAM Assessment Report on Asylum and Migration Policies in Europe, Mercator Dialogue on Asylum and Migration (MEDAM), number 182239.
    13. Jesús Fernández-Huertas Moraga & Hillel Rapoport, 2015. "Tradable Refugee-admission Quotas (TRAQs), the Syrian Crisis and the new European Agenda on Migration," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Philip Grech, 2017. "Undesired properties of the European Commission’s refugee distribution key," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(2), pages 212-238, June.
    15. Braun, Sebastian & Dwenger, Nadja, 2017. "The local environment shapes refugee integration: Evidence from post-war Germany," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 10-2017, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    16. Hatton, Timothy J., 2021. "Asylum Recognition Rates in Europe: Persecution, Policies and Performance," IZA Discussion Papers 14840, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Javier Vázquez-Grenno & Anna Piil Damm & Kristine Vasiljeva & Semih Tumen & Jesús Fernández-Huertas Moraga, 2016. "Economic considerations of the refugee crisis in Europe / Consideraciones económicas sobre la crisis de los refugiados en Europa / Consideracions econòmiques sobre la crisi dels refugiats a Europa," IEB Reports ieb_report_1_2016, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    18. Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús & Rapoport, Hillel, 2014. "Tradable immigration quotas," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 94-108.
    19. Hatton, Timothy J., 2023. "Asylum recognition rates in Europe: Policies and performance," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Botrić Valerija, 2016. "Attitudes Towards Immigrants, Immigration Policies and Labour Market Outcomes: Comparing Croatia with Hungary and Slovenia," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 22(76), pages 5-28, October.
    21. Gerasimos Tsourapas & Sotirios Zartaloudis, 2022. "Leveraging the European Refugee Crisis: Forced Displacement and Bargaining in Greece's Bailout Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 245-263, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:66-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.