IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/journl/v64y2016i1p42-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlations between Expenditure and Employees in R&D Activity by Performance Sectors from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Vasilica Ciuca

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection)

  • Daniela Pasnicu

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection, Spiru Haret University)

  • Gabriela Tudose

    (National Scientific Research Institute for Labour and Social Protection)

  • Mihai Robert Pasnicu

    (Brown University, United States)

Abstract

In the context of increased competition in the recent years, the innovation has become a key factor in economic development through better use of opportunities, capturing new markets and creating high quality jobs. A crucial element for achieving innovation is the R & D, due to the stock of knowledge created at the human, cultural and societal level and its use in designing new applications.In order to manage the funds better in R & D, stimulate competitiveness and attract new funds into R & D, given the target of Europe 2020 Agenda, the paper analyzes the correlation between expenditure and employees in R & D by performance sectors from Romania, and presents a mathematical model which might explain the dynamic of the structure of employees in business sector from R&D. It also considers the impact of the results on the capacity for innovation, economic development and future directions of action to increase investment in R & D, efficient use of intellectual capital and economic specialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasilica Ciuca & Daniela Pasnicu & Gabriela Tudose & Mihai Robert Pasnicu, 2016. "Correlations between Expenditure and Employees in R&D Activity by Performance Sectors from Romania," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 42-51, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsr:journl:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:42-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/RRS01_2016_A4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. M. Scherer, 1986. "Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691027, December.
    2. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2014. "Intellectual Property Rights, the Pool of Knowledge, and Innovation," NBER Working Papers 20014, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Adrian Gardan & Ionel Dumitru & Iuliana Petronela Gardan & Irina Elena Andronie & Cristian Uta & Mihai Andronie, 2019. "Integrating the Principles of Green Marketing by Using Big Data. Good Practices," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 258-258, February.
    2. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:258 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    2. Teitel, Simón, 2008. "Understanding firm performance: The case of developing countries's firms that compete internationally in technologically advanced industries," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 895-906, June.
    3. Rut Atayde & Rafael Garduño & Eduardo Robles & Pluvia Zúñiga, 2021. "Market competition and firm productivity and innovation: Responses in Mexican manufacturing industries," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 1185-1214, August.
    4. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    5. Fernandez Donoso, Jose, 2017. "A simple index of innovation with complexity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17.
    6. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe, 2018. "Are patent fees effective at weeding out low‐quality patents?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 134-148, March.
    7. Charles Ayoubi & Boris Thurm, 2023. "Knowledge diffusion and morality: Why do we freely share valuable information with Strangers?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 75-99, January.
    8. Zohal Hessami, 2016. "How Do Voters React to Complex Choices in a Direct Democracy? Evidence from Switzerland," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 263-293, May.
    9. Cristiano Antonelli, 2017. "The Engines of the Creative Response: Reactivity and Knowledge Governance," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 47(2), pages 9-30, Julio-Dic.
    10. Nathan Chappell & Adam Jaffe, 2018. "Intangible Investment and Firm Performance," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 52(4), pages 509-559, June.
    11. Ernest Kay Bakpa & Hu Xuhua & Abigail Konadu Aboagye, 2021. "Ghana’s economic growth: Directing our focus on the contributing influences of innovation activities and trade," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2213-2237, December.
    12. Danlin Shen & Carl R. Chen & Xinyan Yan & Zhihong Yi, 2022. "Do credit market accessibility and legal protection shape corporate innovation?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(3), pages 719-754, September.
    13. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2015. "Leaders and followers: Perspectives on the Nordic model and the economics of innovation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 3-16.
    14. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2017. "The Revolution of Information Economics: The Past and the Future," NBER Working Papers 23780, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Hamidi, Shima & Zandiatashbar, Ahoura & Bonakdar, Ahmad, 2019. "The relationship between regional compactness and regional innovation capacity (RIC): Empirical evidence from a national study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 394-402.
    16. Wei Zhao & Chao Zhu & Yaoyao Zhu, 2022. "The Comparative Advantage of Cities and Innovation Value Chain: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Antonelli, Cristiano & Crespi, Francesco & Scellato, Giuseppe, 2012. "Inside innovation persistence: New evidence from Italian micro-data," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 341-353.
    18. Karakilic, Emrah, 2019. "Rethinking intellectual property rights in the cognitive and digital age of capitalism: An autonomist Marxist reading," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-9.
    19. Changjie Hu & Ming Liu, 2023. "Protect or Compete? Evidence of Firms’ Innovation from Import Penetration," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Verdolini, Elena & Galeotti, Marzio, 2011. "At home and abroad: An empirical analysis of innovation and diffusion in energy technologies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 119-134, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; R&D; expenditure; employment; investment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:journl:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:42-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.