IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rmcimn/v12y2011i6p261-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can We Increase Sales Force Motivation? Practical Approach: Stimulating Motivation on a Telecom Companies` Sales Force

Author

Listed:
  • Costin DAMASARU

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Radu CAMENITA

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Cristina ANDREESCU (MANOLACHE)

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

What makes the salesmen tick and make them boldly go where no salesmen have gone before? (And make huge profit from it.) Can we classify without mistake the salesmen in different categories? Can we develop a matrix were we can put in the variables and in the end we will have the solution to every sales problems? What if money it’s simply not enough, in some cases? After what point do the incentives start working against the salesmen and the employer? In this research, conducted on a test group of 150 salesmen for a period of 12 months, a Business Sales Department on a major multinational telecom company, spread all around Romania, we will try to find answers to some of these questions. The challenge: understand the mechanics of sales force motivation and sales force incentives, and of course, how they interact. There are two sides of the story - two objectives. The first goal was to increase sales on a product that did not sell very well (interesting for the telecom company), and the second objective was to understand what happens to a group of 150 salesmen when faced to different methods of motivation (interesting for us).

Suggested Citation

  • Costin DAMASARU & Radu CAMENITA & Cristina ANDREESCU (MANOLACHE), 2011. "How Can We Increase Sales Force Motivation? Practical Approach: Stimulating Motivation on a Telecom Companies` Sales Force," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(6), pages 261-267, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:12:y:2011:i:6:p:261-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rmci.ase.ro/no12vol1s/Vol-12_No-1S_Article-41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bagozzi, Richard P, 1980. "The Nature and Causes of Self-Esteem, Performance, and Satisfaction in the Sales Force: A Structural Equation Approach," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(3), pages 315-331, July.
    2. Ajay Kalra & Mengze Shi, 2001. "Designing Optimal Sales Contests: A Theoretical Perspective," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 170-193, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vlad Roșca, 2014. "Web interfaces for e‐CRM in sports: Evidence from Romanian Football," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 9(1), Spring.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Dechenaux & Dan Kovenock & Roman Sheremeta, 2015. "A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(4), pages 609-669, December.
    2. Pavel Kireyev, 2016. "Markets for Ideas: Prize Structure, Entry Limits, and the Design of Ideation Contests," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-129, Harvard Business School.
    3. Christian Terwiesch & Yi Xu, 2008. "Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1529-1543, September.
    4. Ewerhart, Christian, 2016. "An envelope approach to tournament design," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-9.
    5. James W. Bono, 2008. "Sales contests, promotion decisions and heterogeneous risk," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 371-382.
    6. Xiaotie Deng & Yotam Gafni & Ron Lavi & Tao Lin & Hongyi Ling, 2021. "From Monopoly to Competition: Optimal Contests Prevail," Papers 2107.13363, arXiv.org.
    7. Ravula, Prashanth & Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2020. "Antecedents and consequences of cross-effects: An empirical analysis of omni-coupons," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 405-420.
    8. Ramendra Singh, 2008. "Trust and Distrust in Salesperson–Supervisor Dyadic Relationship and Its Impact on Sales Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 101-113, June.
    9. Arne Lauber & Christoph March & Marco Sahm, 2022. "Optimal and Fair Prizing in Sequential Round-Robin Tournaments: Experimental Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 9651, CESifo.
    10. Johannes Habel & Sascha Alavi & Nicolas Heinitz, 2023. "A theory of predictive sales analytics adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 34-54, June.
    11. Ajay Kalra & Mengze Shi & Kannan Srinivasan, 2003. "Salesforce Compensation Scheme and Consumer Inferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 655-672, May.
    12. Radhika Santhanam & De Liu & Wei-Cheng Milton Shen, 2016. "Research Note—Gamification of Technology-Mediated Training: Not All Competitions Are the Same," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 453-465, June.
    13. Bas J. Dietzenbacher & Aleksei Y. Kondratev, 2023. "Fair and Consistent Prize Allocation in Competitions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3319-3339, June.
    14. Marco Francesco Mazzù & Angelo Baccelloni & Ludovico Lavini, 2022. "Injecting trust in consumer purchase intention through blockchain: evidences from the food supply chain," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(4), pages 459-482, December.
    15. Kräkel, Matthias & Schöttner, Anja, 2010. "Technology Choice and Incentives under Relative Performance Schemes," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 10/2010, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    16. Drugov, Mikhail & Ryvkin, Dmitry, 2020. "Tournament rewards and heavy tails," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. William E. Gillis & Ellen McEwan & T. Russell Crook & Steven C. Michael, 2011. "Using Tournaments to Reduce Agency Problems: The Case of Franchising," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(3), pages 427-447, May.
    18. Yan Dong & Yuliang Yao & Tony Haitao Cui, 2011. "When Acquisition Spoils Retention: Direct Selling vs. Delegation Under CRM," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(7), pages 1288-1299, July.
    19. Kräkel, Matthias & Schöttner, Anja, 2010. "Technology choice, relative performance pay, and worker heterogeneity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 748-758, December.
    20. Qiang Fu & Ganesh Iyer, 2019. "Multimarket Value Creation and Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 129-149, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sales force; motivation; telecom companies; management.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:12:y:2011:i:6:p:261-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marian Nastase (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.