Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Evaluación Multicriterio Social: ¿Una metodología participativa de ayuda a la toma de decisiones o un aprendizaje social sujeto a una reinterpretación institucional-evolucionista?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Edgar Fürst Weigand

    ()
    (Centro Internacional de Política Económica para el Desarrollo Sostenible (CINPE), Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    En los últimos años la evaluación multicriterio social ha venido emergiendo como una metodología alternativa a las convencionales imperantes en la valoración económica del ambiente, para enfrentar, de forma participativa, la inconmensurabilidad social y técnica en la gestión conflictiva de recursos. Este artículo pretende, por un lado, revelar algunos límites de índole conceptual inmanentes de la evaluación multicriterio desde la perspectiva institucionalista de evolución y conducta social; y por otro, con base en la visión de vida digna, equidad y libertad centrada en el sujeto-actor. Se delinea una agenda de investigación que fundamenta el subyacente proceso de aprendizaje y sus condiciones de igualdad sobre un tratamiento institucional del comportamiento socio-individual condicionado por hábitos, rutinas y normas, que a su vez guardan relación dialéctica con pautas complejas de agencia y estructura (en particular: poder) en la sociedad capitalista excluyente en la era de globalización.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.redibec.org/ccount/click.php?id=44
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica in its journal Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2008)
    Issue (Month): ()
    Pages: 1-13

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:rib:revibe:rev8_01

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Edifici C, Campus UAB, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.redibec.org
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Evaluación multicriterio social; economía ecológica; institucionalismo basado en evolución socioeconómica; aprendizaje social; reproducción de la vida humana y natural;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Gamper, C.D. & Turcanu, C., 2007. "On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 298-307, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rib:revibe:rev8_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jesús Ramos-Martín).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.