IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/bbejor/v4y2015i2p105-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis for Cobb-Douglas Production Function, the Capability Proxies, Net Society Value and Technology Indicator

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Yan

    (Institute for the History of Science and Technology, Iner Mongolia Normal University)

Abstract

This paper establishes an estimate system and forms the capability proxy, the technology capability proxy and the total net society value, etc. and demonstrates the progress of technology can make the capability increase and finds that the technology capability is mainly decided by the ability of the scientists and engineers. The paper completely analyzes the Cobb-Douglas production function and first make out how does it be formed theoretically, what is the , , why equals one and demonstrate that in the profit-maximizing condition the excess profit is not necessarily to be zero and there is a bias when we apply of the Cobb-Douglas production function to measure both the capability and the technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Yan, 2015. "An Analysis for Cobb-Douglas Production Function, the Capability Proxies, Net Society Value and Technology Indicator," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 4(2), pages 105-126, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:105-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/index.php/BBE/article/view/375/322
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/index.php/BBE/article/view/375
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mokyr, Joel, 2005. "Long-Term Economic Growth and the History of Technology," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 17, pages 1113-1180, Elsevier.
    2. Frensch, Richard & Gaucaite Wittich, Vitalija, 2009. "Product variety and technical change," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 242-257, March.
    3. Fagerberg, Jan, 1987. "A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2-4), pages 87-99, August.
    4. Timmer, Marcel P., 2003. "Technological development and rates of return to investment in a catching-up economy: the case of South Korea," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 405-425, December.
    5. Magnus Blomström & Ari Kokko & Mario Zejan, 2000. "Technology, Market Characteristics and Spillovers," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Foreign Direct Investment, chapter 10, pages 160-176, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Saranga, Haritha, 2009. "The Indian auto component industry - Estimation of operational efficiency and its determinants using DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 707-718, July.
    7. Poirier, Dale J, 1975. "On the Use of Cobb-Douglas Splines," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 16(3), pages 733-744, October.
    8. Marjorie L. Handsaker & Paul H. Douglas, 1937. "The Theory of Marginal Productivity Tested by Data for Manufacturing in Victoria, I," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 52(1), pages 1-36.
    9. Liu, Zhiqiang, 2008. "Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Theory and evidence," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1-2), pages 176-193, February.
    10. Grace T. Gunn & Paul H. Douglas, 1940. "Further Measurements of Marginal Productivity," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 54(3), pages 399-428.
    11. E. H. Phelps Brown, 1957. "The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 71(4), pages 546-560.
    12. Douglas, Paul H, 1976. "The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(5), pages 903-915, October.
    13. M. Bronfenbrenner & Paul H. Douglas, 1939. "Cross-Section Studies in the Cobb-Douglas Function," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(6), pages 761-761.
    14. David Durand, 1937. "Some Thoughts on Marginal Productivity, with Special Reference to Professor Douglas' Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(6), pages 740-740.
    15. Francesco Caselli & Wilbur John Coleman II, 2006. "The World Technology Frontier," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 499-522, June.
    16. Grace T. Gunn & Paul H. Douglas, 1941. "The Production Function for Australian Manufacturing," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 56(1_Part_1), pages 108-129.
    17. Samuelson, Paul A, 1979. "Paul Douglas's Measurement of Production Functions and Marginal Productivities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(5), pages 923-939, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesus Felipe & John S.L. McCombie, 2013. "The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1975.
    2. Jesus Felipe & F. Gerard Adams, 2005. ""A Theory of Production" The Estimation of the Cobb-Douglas Function: A Retrospective View," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 427-445, Summer.
    3. Chen, Shuo & Lan, Xiaohuan, 2020. "Tractor vs. animal: Rural reforms and technology adoption in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Jin, Shaosheng & Guo, Haiyue & Delgado, Michael S. & Wang, H. Holly, 2017. "Benefit or damage? The productivity effects of FDI in the Chinese food industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Lumengo Bonga-bonga & Maphelane Phume, 2018. "Assessing the relationship between total factor productivity and foreign direct investment in an economy with a skills shortage: the case of South Africa," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(3), pages 1395-1405.
    6. Bin Ni & Hayato Kato, 2020. "Do vertical spillovers differ by investors’ productivity? Theory and evidence from Vietnam," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 1046-1072, August.
    7. Harrison, Ann & Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, 2010. "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Dani Rodrik & Mark Rosenzweig (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 4039-4214, Elsevier.
    8. Neil Foster-McGregor, 2012. "Innovation and Technology Transfer across Countries," wiiw Research Reports 380, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    9. Yoshimichi Murakami & Keijiro Otsuka, 2017. "A Review of the Literature on Productivity Impacts of Global Value Chains and Foreign Direct Investment: Towards an Integrated Approach," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-19, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Aug 2019.
    10. Taotao Chen & Ari Kokko & Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall, 2011. "FDI and spillovers in China: non-linearity and absorptive capacity," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22.
    11. Jesus Felipe & John McCombie, 2020. "The illusions of calculating total factor productivity and testing growth models: from Cobb-Douglas to Solow and Romer," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 470-513, July.
    12. Jesus Felipe & Franklin M. Fisher, 2003. "Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2‐3), pages 208-262, May.
    13. Jeff Biddle, 2012. "Retrospectives: The Introduction of the Cobb-Douglas Regression," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 223-236, Spring.
    14. Klaus E Meyer & Evis Sinani, 2009. "When and where does foreign direct investment generate positive spillovers? A meta-analysis," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(7), pages 1075-1094, September.
    15. Jesus Felipe & John McCombie, 2006. "The Tyranny of the Identity: Growth Accounting Revisited," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 283-299.
    16. Jesus Felipe & J. S. L. McCombie, 2005. "How Sound are the Foundations of the Aggregate Production Function?," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 467-488, Summer.
    17. Jesus Felipe & J. S. L. McCombie, 2002. "A Problem with Some Estimations and Interpretations of the Mark-up in Manufacturing Industry," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 187-215.
    18. Csugány Julianna & Tánczos Tamás, 2020. "Regional Differences in the Conditions of Technological Progress in Europe," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 66(1), pages 1-12, March.
    19. Marin, Anabel & Sasidharan, Subash, 2010. "Heterogeneous MNC subsidiaries and technological spillovers: Explaining positive and negative effects in India," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1227-1241, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    production function; technology; society; profit maximization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:105-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.