IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v4y2016i2p125-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-cultural Factors and Practices Affecting the Girl Child among the Annang People of Akwa Ibom State

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalene Agbor Igbolo
  • Frances Umari Ejue

Abstract

Household discriminatory practices on the girl-child have drawn attention worldwide due to deep-rooted socio-cultural beliefs, values and practices. Despite extensive empirical evidence in literature there is a dearth of studies in Nigeria in particular. This study examined the socio-cultural factors and practices affecting the girl-child among the Annang, an ethnic group in Akwa-Ibom State-Nigeria. The study adopted the Weber¡¯s social action theory as theoretical framework to provide theoretical orientation to the issue investigated. A multi-methodological approach was adopted in generating data. A household survey was conducted among 100 respondents which comprised of pairs of fathers/male-children and mothers/female-children. A four-staged sampling technique was used to purposively select 3 Enumeration Areas (EAs). Structured questionnaires elicited information on cultural construction of girlhood, familial roles and household practices from both adults and boy and girl-children. Four Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and IDIs which centred on gender socialization, gender relations, household practices, and socio-cultural factors were conducted among adults males and females as well as male and female-children. Indepth interviews were also conducted with religious leaders, traditional rulers, as well as male and female community leaders. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The qualitative data employed content analysis as well as thematic narratives of participants and key informants views and responses. Adult respondents¡¯ mean age was 40.3¡À10.0 years, 98.1% were married, and 81.7% were farmers. The mean age for boys and girl-children was 13.5¡À3.2 years. Majority of the respondents were rural dwellers (82.0%). Majority of respondents (97.1%) opined that the status of the girl-child was very low relative to the boy-child. About 99% affirmed that girl-children were disadvantaged with regard to opportunities and privileges. The girl-child faced household discriminatory practices in domestic work assignment (79.0%), education (78.4%) and restrictive food taboos (32.2%). Significant others approved such practices. About 67% of girl-children perceived the practices as acceptable to the Annang people. The qualitative data identified socio-cultural factors such as conception of gender roles, gender socialization, son preference, cultural construction of girlhood, and valuation of the girl-child, decision-making, gender stereotyping among others engendered these practices. Cultural construction of girlhood was largely defined by the respondents¡¯ societal notions on femininity. Household discriminatory practices among the Annang people, was largely due to socio-cultural factors and practices. Therefore, serious attention should be given to community mobilization and sensitization to address the socio-cultural factors and harmful practices which limit the empowerment of the girl-child.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalene Agbor Igbolo & Frances Umari Ejue, 2016. "Socio-cultural Factors and Practices Affecting the Girl Child among the Annang People of Akwa Ibom State," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 125-143, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:125-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/2007/2113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/2007
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelly Lundberg, 2005. "Sons, Daughters, and Parental Behaviour," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 340-356, Autumn.
    2. Johannes Jütting & Christian Morrisson, 2005. "Changing Social Institutions to Improve the Status of Women in Developing Countries," OECD Development Centre Policy Briefs 27, OECD Publishing.
    3. Johannes Jütting & Christian Morrisson, 2005. "Culture, Gender and Growth," OECD Development Centre Policy Insights 15, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunnar Andersson & Karsten Hank & Andres Vikat, 2006. "Understanding parental gender preferences in advanced societies: lessons from Sweden and Finland," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2006-019, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    2. Michael J. Kottelenberg & Steven F. Lehrer, 2019. "How Skills and Parental Valuation of Education Influence Human Capital Acquisition and Early Labor Market Return to Human Capital in Canada," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(S2), pages 735-778.
    3. Michael Baker & Kevin Milligan, 2016. "Boy-Girl Differences in Parental Time Investments: Evidence from Three Countries," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 399-441.
    4. Francine D. Blau & Lawrence M. Kahn & Matthew Comey & Amanda Eng & Pamela Meyerhofer & Alexander Willén, 2020. "Culture and gender allocation of tasks: source country characteristics and the division of non-market work among US immigrants," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 907-958, December.
    5. Briole, Simon & Le Forner, Hélène & Lepinteur, Anthony, 2020. "Children’s socio-emotional skills: Is there a quantity–quality trade-off?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Ingvild Almås & Alexander W. Cappelen & Kjell G. Salvanes & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2016. "Willingness to Compete: Family Matters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2149-2162, August.
    7. Laura Giuliano, 2007. "The Demand for Sons or the Demand for Fathers? Understanding the Effects of Child Gender on Divorce Rates," Working Papers 0724, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
    8. Eva Deuchert & Martin Huber, 2017. "A Cautionary Tale About Control Variables in IV Estimation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(3), pages 411-425, June.
    9. Yamamura, Eiji, 2013. "Effects of sex preference and social pressure on fertility in changing Japanese families," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 97-104.
    10. David W Lawson & Arijeta Makoli & Anna Goodman, 2013. "Sibling Configuration Predicts Individual and Descendant Socioeconomic Success in a Modern Post-Industrial Society," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    11. Michael J. Kottelenberg & Steven F. Lehrer, 2018. "Does Quebec’s subsidized child care policy give boys and girls an equal start?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(2), pages 627-659, May.
    12. Brenøe, Anne Ardila & Lundberg, Shelly, 2018. "Gender gaps in the effects of childhood family environment: Do they persist into adulthood?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 42-62.
    13. Anna Raute & Andrea Weber & Galina Zudenkova, 2022. "Can public policy increase paternity acknowledgment? Evidence from earnings-related parental leave," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 2206, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    14. Zurab Abramishvili & William Appleman & Sergii Maksymovych, 2019. "Parental Gender Preference in the Balkans and Scandinavia: Gender Bias or Differential Costs?," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp643, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    15. Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska & Magdalena Grabowska, 2023. "The sex preference for children in Europe: Children’s sex and the probability and timing of births," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(8), pages 203-232.
    16. Kristin Mammen, 2020. "Children’s Gender and Investments from Nonresident Fathers," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 332-349, June.
    17. Moffitt, Robert A. & Ribar, David C., 2018. "Child age and gender differences in food security in a low-income U.S. inner-city population," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 23-41.
    18. Eva Rye Johansen & Helena Skyt Nielsen & Mette Verner, 2018. "Long-term Consequences of Early Parenthood," Economics Working Papers 2018-01-, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    19. Francine D. Blau & Lawrence M. Kahn & Peter Brummund & Jason Cook & Miriam Larson-Koester, 2020. "Is there still son preference in the United States?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 709-750, July.
    20. Byrne, Delma & Smyth, Emer, 2011. "Behind the Scenes? A Study of Parental Involvement in Post-Primary Education," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT178, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    socio-cultural factors; girl child; empowerment; education; harmful traditional practices;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:125-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.