IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ret/ecocri/rec31_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factores de desigualdad entre teletrabajadores en Europa

Author

Listed:
  • Purificación López-Igual

    (Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla)

  • Paula Rodríguez-Modroño

    (Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla)

Abstract

Los cambios tecnológicos provocados por la digitalización, la automatización y la globalización están permitiendo que más trabajadores/as puedan desempeñar sus tareas desde múltiples ubicaciones. Esta expansión del teletrabajo, estimulada aún más por la pandemia del COVID-19, transforma no solo los espacios y tiempos de trabajo, sino también las relaciones laborales y condiciones de empleo. Nuestro objetivo es explorar las nuevas desigualdades entre distintos tipos de trabajadores atendiendo a la intensidad y lugar de uso de las tecnologías. El estudio empírico utiliza datos de más de veinte mil trabajadores de la UE-15 de la 6ª Encuesta Europea de Condiciones de Trabajo para analizar, mediante modelos de regresión logística multinomial, los diferentes perfiles de teletrabajadores. El análisis muestra la tendencia al aumento en la heterogeneidad de los perfiles de teletrabajadores/as y a desigualdades crecientes entre ellos. Hay grandes diferencias entre los distintos tipos de teletrabajadores atendiendo a la ocupación, el sector de actividad y el país. Las mujeres se encuentran mayoritariamente en el grupo de teletrabajadores más precarios y con peores condiciones laborales

Suggested Citation

  • Purificación López-Igual & Paula Rodríguez-Modroño, 2021. "Factores de desigualdad entre teletrabajadores en Europa," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 31, pages 62-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:ret:ecocri:rec31_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistaeconomiacritica.org/index.php/rec/article/view/443/426
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ylenia Curzi & Barbara Pistoresi & Tommaso Fabbri, 2020. "Understanding the stressful implications of remote e-working: Evidence from Europe," Department of Economics 0165, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    2. Knudsen, Hannah K. & Ducharme, Lori J. & Roman, Paul M., 2007. "Job stress and poor sleep quality: Data from an American sample of full-time workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1997-2007, May.
    3. Cary L. Cooper & Judi Marshall, 2013. "Occupational Sources of Stress: A Review of the Literature Relating to Coronary Heart Disease and Mental Ill Health," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Cary L. Cooper (ed.), From Stress to Wellbeing Volume 1, chapter 1, pages 3-23, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    5. Eva Thulin & Bertil Vilhelmson & Martina Johansson, 2019. "New Telework, Time Pressure, and Time Use Control in Everyday Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johanna Edvinsson & Svend Erik Mathiassen & Sofie Bjärntoft & Helena Jahncke & Terry Hartig & David M. Hallman, 2022. "A Work Time Control Tradeoff in Flexible Work: Competitive Pathways to Need for Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Paula Rodríguez-Modroño & Purificación López-Igual, 2021. "Job Quality and Work—Life Balance of Teleworkers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    4. Angela Garcia Calvo & Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2023. "Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectives," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(4), pages 795-814.
    5. Christian Pfeifer, 2015. "UnfairWage Perceptions and Sleep: Evidence from German Survey Data," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 135(4), pages 413-428.
    6. Halko, Marja-Liisa & Lappalainen, Olli & Sääksvuori, Lauri, 2021. "Do non-choice data reveal economic preferences? Evidence from biometric data and compensation-scheme choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 87-104.
    7. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    8. Nurmi, Niina & Koroma, Johanna, 2020. "The emotional benefits and performance costs of building a psychologically safe language climate in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    9. Aniela Balacescu & Aurelia Patrascu & Loredana Maria Paunescu, 2021. "Adaptability to Teleworking in European Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 683-683, August.
    10. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge [How Europe’s economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    11. Jihad FRAIJ & Nemer ABURUMMAN, 2021. "How Does Telework Act As A Solution To The Public Sector In The Time Of Pandemic?," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 13-24, June.
    12. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    13. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    14. Christian P Theurer & Andranik Tumasjan & Isabell M Welpe, 2018. "Contextual work design and employee innovative work behavior: When does autonomy matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, October.
    15. Andrea Salvatori & Seetha Menon & Wouter Zwysen, 2018. "The effect of computer use on job quality: Evidence from Europe," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 200, OECD Publishing.
    16. Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia & Laura Borgogni & Chiara Consiglio & Pietro Menatta, 2021. "The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    18. M. Lynne Markus & Frantz Rowe, 2018. "Is IT changing the world?," Post-Print hal-03716243, HAL.
    19. Zhuofei Lu & Senhu Wang & Wendy Olsen, 2023. "Revisiting the ‘flexibility paradox’: degree of work schedule flexibility and time use patterns across gender and occupational groups," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Sandra Figueiredo & Raquel João & Laura Alho & João Hipólito, 2022. "Psychological Research on Sleep Problems and Adjustment of Working Hours during Teleworking in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ret:ecocri:rec31_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emilio Padilla Rosa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aecrcea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.