IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rce/rvceco/47624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wage gap between public and private sector analysis in Costa Rica: evidence found based on household surveys from 2006 to 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Ballestero, Andrea

Abstract

This document identifies the proportion of the wage gap between the public and private sector in Costa Rica that is due to the difference in the workers’ characteristics, as well as the proportion attributed to the difference in the payment structures, according to 2006 and 2016 household surveys. The results show that the wage gap between the public sector and the private sector in Costa Rica has widened between 2006 and 2016 (approximately from 59% to 64% in the case of men, and from 59% to 66% in the case of women) and that the portion attributable to the difference in the payment structure of each sector has remained remarkably similar for male workers (28% in 2006 and 25% in 2016), while it has increased for female workers (16% in 2006 and 35% in 2016).

Suggested Citation

  • Ballestero, Andrea, 2021. "Wage gap between public and private sector analysis in Costa Rica: evidence found based on household surveys from 2006 to 2016," Revista de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Económicas, Universidad de Costa Rica, vol. 39(1), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rce:rvceco:47624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/economicas/article/view/47624
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugo Panizza, 2001. "Public Sector Wages and Bureaucratic Quality: Evidence from Latin America," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Fall 2001), pages 97-152, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dzhumashev, Ratbek, 2014. "Corruption and growth: The role of governance, public spending, and economic development," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 202-215.
    2. Ricardo Hausmann & Ljubica Nedelkoska & Sehar Noor, 2020. "You Get What You Pay For: Sources and Consequences of the Public Sector Premium in Albania and Sri Lanka," CID Working Papers 376, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    3. Panizza, Ugo & Qiang, Christine Zhen-Wei, 2005. "Public-private wage differential and gender gap in Latin America: Spoiled bureaucrats and exploited women?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 810-833, December.
    4. Van-Ha Le & Jakob de Haan & Erik Dietzenbacher & Jakob de Haan, 2013. "Do Higher Government Wages Reduce Corruption? Evidence Based on a Novel Dataset," CESifo Working Paper Series 4254, CESifo.
    5. World Bank, 2004. "Uruguay : Poverty Update 2003," World Bank Publications - Reports 15682, The World Bank Group.
    6. Glomm, Gerhard & Jung, Juergen & Tran, Chung, 2009. "Macroeconomic implications of early retirement in the public sector: The case of Brazil," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 777-797, April.
    7. Macchiavello, Rocco, 2008. "Public sector motivation and development failures," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 201-213, April.
    8. Rhea Molato, 2015. "Public-Private Wage Differentials and the Quality of Government Workers in the Philippines," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2015-06, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    9. Quintero, Luis E. & Roberts, Mark, 2023. "Cities and productivity: Evidence from 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Arzu Yavuz, 2011. "Productivity and Wage Differentials between Private and Public Sector in the Developing Countries (Gelismekte Olan �lkelerde �zel ve Kamu Sekt�r�ndeki Verimlilik ve �cret Farklilasmasi)," Working Papers 1103, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    11. Gans-Morse, Jordan & Borges, Mariana & Makarin, Alexey & Mannah-Blankson, Theresa & Nickow, Andre & Zhang, Dong, 2018. "Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 171-188.
    12. Nelson Marconi & Paulo Arvate & João Moura Neto & Paulo Palombo, 2009. "Vertical transfers and the appropriation of resources by the bureaucracy: the case of Brazilian state governments," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 65-85, October.
    13. World Bank, 2007. "Mongolia : Building the Skills for the New Economy," World Bank Publications - Reports 7746, The World Bank Group.
    14. Ratbek Dzhumashev, 2014. "The Two-Way Relationship Between Government Spending And Corruption And Its Effects On Economic Growth," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(2), pages 403-419, April.
    15. Mizala, Alejandra & Romaguera, Pilar & Gallegos, Sebastián, 2011. "Public–private wage gap in Latin America (1992–2007): A matching approach," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(S1), pages 115-131.
    16. Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Lokshin, Michael & Kolchin, Vladimir, 2023. "Effects of public sector wages on corruption: Wage inequality matters," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 941-959.
    17. Glomm Gerhard & Jung Juergen & Lee Changmin & Tran Chung, 2010. "Public Sector Pension Policies and Capital Accumulation in an Emerging Economy: The Case of Brazil," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-40, June.
    18. Gerhard Glomm & Juergen Jung & Changmin Lee & Chung Tran, 2009. "Public Sector Pension Policies and Capital Accumulation in Emerging Economies," Discussion Papers 2009-10, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    19. Frenkel, Roberto & Ros, Jaime, 2004. "Unemployment, macroeconomic policy and labor market flexibility: Argentina and Mexico in the 1990s," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 31908, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    20. Eréndira León Bravo, 2022. "Three essays on education, wages, and the labour market in Mexico," Economics PhD Theses 0322, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rce:rvceco:47624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luis J. Hall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiucrcr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.