IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les "droits à polluer" aux États-Unis

Author

Listed:
  • Sylviane Gastaldo

Abstract

[fre] Les "droits à polluer" aux Etats-Unis . La réglementation américaine en matière d'environnement est particulièrement sévère. Pour la rendre plus flexible et moins coûteuse tout en respectant globalement un objectif de qualité de l'environnement, le législateur a institué des "marchés de droits à polluer". Ils permettent, sous certaines conditions, des échanges de droits à polluer : chaque centre pollueur peut alors arbitrer entre le coût de la lutte contre la pollution et le prix d'un permis ou droit à polluer. . Aux Etats-Unis, cette politique de répartition et de réduction des coûts de la pollution a porté sur l'eau, l'air et la présence de plomb dans l'essence. L'expérience n'a été vraiment concluante que dans ce dernier domaine : la réglementation des échanges de droits était souple et les raffineurs étaient habitués à négocier entre eux. . Dans le domaine de la pollution atmosphérique, les amendements de la loi de 1990 (Clean Air Act) renforcent les marchés de droits en étendant les échanges de permis à de nouveaux polluants, comme le dioxyde de soufre. [eng] "Marketable Emission Permits" in the United States . American environmental regulations are particularly strict. Legislators have introduced "emissions trading markets" in order to make these regulations more flexible and less expensive while respecting an environmental quality goal overall. These markets allow the trading of emissions permits on certain terms. Each polluting centre can therefore choose between the cost of fighting pollution and the price of a pollution right or marketable permit. . In the United States, this policy to distribute and reduce the cost of pollution concentrated on water, air and the presence of lead in petrol. The experiment was only really conclusive in this last area as regulations concerning the emissions trading were flexible and the refiners were used to negotiating with each other. . In the area of atmospheric pollution, amendments to the 1990 Clean Air Act have strengthened marketable permit markets by extending emissions trading to new pollutants such as sulphur dioxide. [spa] Los "derechos a la contaminaciôn" en los Estados Unidos . La reglamentaciôn norteamericana en materia de medio ambiente es particularmente severa. Para hacerla mâs flexible y menos costosa respetando globalmente un objetivo de calidad del medio ambiente, el legislador instituyô "mercados de derechos a la contaminaciôn". Permiten bajo ciertas condiciones, intercambios de derechos a la contaminaciôn : cada centro de contaminaciôn puede asi arbitrar entre el costo de la lucha contra la contaminaciôn y el precio de una autorizaciôn o derecho a la contaminaciôn. . En los Estados Unidos, esta polîtica de reparticiôn y de reducciôn de los costos de la contaminaciôn ha sido orientada hacia el agua, el aire y la presencia de plomo en la gasolina. La experiencia no ha sido realmente concluyente mâs que en ese ultimo âmbito : la reglementaciôn de los intercambios de derechos era flexible y los refinadores estaban acostumbrados a negociar entre ellos. . En el àrea de la contaminaciôn atmosférica, las enmiendas de la ley de 1 990 {Clean Air Act ) refuerzan los mercados de derechos al extender los intercambios de autorizaciones a nuevos contaminantes, como el diôxido de azufre.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylviane Gastaldo, 1992. "Les "droits à polluer" aux États-Unis," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 35-41.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5690
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1992.5690
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1992.5690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1992.5690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1992.5690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tietenberg, T H, 1990. "Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 17-33, Spring.
    2. Cropper, Maureen L & Oates, Wallace E, 1992. "Environmental Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 675-740, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonella Faggiani & Ezio Micelli, 2001. "New tools for land policy in Italy," ERES eres2001_156, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Ezio Micelli, 2002. "Development Rights Markets to Manage Urban Plans in Italy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(1), pages 141-154, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaughan, William J. & Ardila, Sergio, 1993. "Economic Analysis of the Environmental Aspects of Investment Projects," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 6300, Inter-American Development Bank.
    2. Hahn, Robert W., 2000. "The Impact of Economics on Environmental Policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 375-399, May.
    3. Farzin, Y. H., 1996. "Optimal pricing of environmental and natural resource use with stock externalities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 31-57, October.
    4. William J. Vaughan & Sergio Ardila, 1993. "Economic Analysis of the Environmental Aspects of Investment Projects," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 25438, Inter-American Development Bank.
    5. Blackman, Allen & Harrington, Winston, 1998. "Using Alternative Regulatory Instruments to Control Fixed Point Air Pollution in Developing Countries: Lessons from International Experience," RFF Working Paper Series dp-98-21, Resources for the Future.
    6. Winebrake, James J. & Farrell, Alexander E. & Bernstein, Mark A., 1995. "The clean air act's sulfur dioxide emissions market: Estimating the costs of regulatory and legislative intervention," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 239-260, November.
    7. Imane Bounadi & Khalil Allali & Aziz Fadlaoui & Mohammed Dehhaoui, 2023. "Water Pollution Abatement in Olive Oil Industry in Morocco: Cost Estimates and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    8. C. Rendleman & Kenneth Reinert & James Tobey, 1995. "Market-based systems for reducing chemical use in agriculture in the United States," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(1), pages 51-70, January.
    9. Willem Heijman & Mordechai Shechter, 1993. "Introduction," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 3(3), pages 217-220, June.
    10. Halkos, George, 2000. "Determining optimal air quality standards: Quantities or prices?," MPRA Paper 42849, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Lanoie, Paul & Laplante, Benoît & Tanguay, Georges A., 1994. "La firme et l’environnement," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 70(2), pages 97-111, juin.
    12. R. Devlin & R. Grafton, 1994. "Tradeable permits, missing markets, and technology," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4(2), pages 171-186, April.
    13. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    14. Inés Macho-Stadler, 2008. "Environmental regulation: choice of instruments under imperfect compliance," Spanish Economic Review, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Sam Fankhauser & Cameron Hepburn, 2009. "Carbon markets in space and time," GRI Working Papers 3, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    16. Sims, Katharine R.E. & Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M., 2017. "Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 8-28.
    17. Cinzia Di Novi, 2007. "An Economic Evaluation of Life-Style and Air-pollution-related Damages: Results from the BRFSS," JEPS Working Papers 07-001, JEPS.
    18. Managi, Shunsuke & Opaluch, James J. & Jin, Di & Grigalunas, Thomas A., 2006. "Stochastic frontier analysis of total factor productivity in the offshore oil and gas industry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 204-215, November.
    19. Bonacina, Monica & Gulli`, Francesco, 2007. "Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4200-4220, August.
    20. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.