IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0253775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The fisheries governance tool: A practical and accessible approach to evaluating management systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jill H Swasey
  • Suzanne Iudicello
  • Graeme Parkes
  • Robert Trumble
  • Kara Stevens
  • Martha Silver
  • Cheri A Recchia

Abstract

The Fisheries Governance Tool (FGT) is a comprehensive, evidence-based diagnostic tool that fishery managers, environmental organizations, funders, investors, and other key stakeholders can use to track progress against sustainability goals, identify gaps and challenges that impede continued improvement, and set targets for improvement. The diagnostic tool was developed following a thorough review of existing evaluation and assessment schemes and builds upon many of the credible and widely accepted guidelines and assessment tools currently available. It is built on the premise that the most comprehensive and informative measures of country or regional performance requires evaluation of evidence across three components: 1) the laws and policies governing fisheries, 2) the capacity to implement those policies, and 3) the functioning and performance of the fishery management system and fisheries. The Tool’s reliance on empirical evidence allows for an objective, repeatable and rigorous evaluation. Driving this work has been recognition of the importance of identifying and strengthening the enabling conditions for good fisheries management. The FGT offers a unique integrated evaluation of enabling factors and outcomes across the triple bottom line of ecological sustainability, economic efficiency and social/community well-being, with measures spanning a range of identifiable performance levels. Measures identify the building blocks of sound and durable management that lead to more sustainable and responsible fisheries. The Tool was refined through consultation with experts from around the world. The public version of the FGT can be downloaded and allows users to enter data and visualize the results, providing a diagnosis of their management system. The Tool is available in several languages.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill H Swasey & Suzanne Iudicello & Graeme Parkes & Robert Trumble & Kara Stevens & Martha Silver & Cheri A Recchia, 2021. "The fisheries governance tool: A practical and accessible approach to evaluating management systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253775
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253775
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253775&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0253775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James L Anderson & Christopher M Anderson & Jingjie Chu & Jennifer Meredith & Frank Asche & Gil Sylvia & Martin D Smith & Dessy Anggraeni & Robert Arthur & Atle Guttormsen & Jessica K McCluney & Tim W, 2015. "The Fishery Performance Indicators: A Management Tool for Triple Bottom Line Outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giné, Xavier & Martinez-Bravo, Monica & Vidal-Fernández, Marian, 2017. "Are labor supply decisions consistent with neoclassical preferences? Evidence from Indian boat owners," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 331-347.
    2. Laurie Richmond & Robert Dumouchel & Henry Pontarelli & Laura Casali & Wyatt Smith & Kathryn Gillick & Pamela Godde & Michelle Dowling & Alyssa Suarez, 2019. "Fishing Community Sustainability Planning: A Roadmap and Examples from the California Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Tracy Van Holt & Wendy Weisman & Jeffrey C. Johnson & Sofia Käll & Jack Whalen & Braddock Spear & Pedro Sousa, 2016. "A Social Wellbeing in Fisheries Tool (SWIFT) to Help Improve Fisheries Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Hammond, James & van Wijk, Mark & Teufel, Nils & Mekonnen, Kindu & Thorne, Peter, 2021. "Assessing smallholder sustainable intensification in the Ethiopian highlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Hing Ling Chan & Minling Pan, 2021. "Fishing trip cost modeling using generalized linear model and machine learning methods – A case study with longline fisheries in the Pacific and an application in Regulatory Impact Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Inês Pereira & Ualerson Iran Peixoto & Wendell Medeiros-Leal & Morgan Casal-Ribeiro & Régis Santos, 2022. "Multidimensional Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of Demersal Small-Scale Fishery in the Azores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Tran, Nhuong & Shikuku, Kelvin Mashisia & Peart, Jeffrey & Chan, Chin Yee & Chu, Long & Bailey, Conner & Valdivia, Roberto, 2022. "A Review of economic analysis of climate change impacts and adaptation in fisheries and aquaculture," SocArXiv zctxn, Center for Open Science.
    8. Nathan J. Bennett & Jessica Blythe & Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor & Gerald G. Singh & U. Rashid Sumaila, 2019. "Just Transformations to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Char-lee Moyle & Brent Moyle & Lisa Ruhanen & Alexandra Bec & Betty Weiler, 2018. "Business Sustainability: How Does Tourism Compare?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Shion Takemura & Hidetomo Tajima & Juri Hori & Mitsutaku Makino & John Banana Matewere & Dorothea Agnes Rampisela & Tetsu Sato, 2022. "Autonomous Innovations in Rural Communities of Developing Countries II—Causal Network and Leverage Point Analyses of Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Stefano B. Longo & Brett Clark & Thomas E. Shriver & Rebecca Clausen, 2016. "Sustainability and Environmental Sociology: Putting the Economy in its Place and Moving Toward an Integrative Socio-Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.