IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1904-d218457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fishing Community Sustainability Planning: A Roadmap and Examples from the California Coast

Author

Listed:
  • Laurie Richmond

    (Department of Environmental Science & Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Robert Dumouchel

    (Department of Environmental Science & Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Henry Pontarelli

    (Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, USA)

  • Laura Casali

    (Department of Environmental Science & Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Wyatt Smith

    (Department of Environmental Science & Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Kathryn Gillick

    (Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, USA)

  • Pamela Godde

    (Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, USA)

  • Michelle Dowling

    (Department of Environmental Science & Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

  • Alyssa Suarez

    (Department of Environmental Science & Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA)

Abstract

Fishing communities are facing a variety of challenges including declines in participation, reduced access to fish resources, aging physical infrastructure, gentrification, competition from foreign imports, the “graying” or aging of their fleets, along with a host of environmental stressors. These factors can represent threats to the continued viability of individual fishing communities. Such communities are clearly in need of tools that will enable them to plan strategically and to be more proactive in charting a sustainable future. This manuscript provides a roadmap for how to engage fishing communities in a bottom-up strategic planning process termed “fishing community sustainability planning” by describing implementation efforts in four diverse California ports: Morro Bay, Monterey, Shelter Cove, and Eureka. The process draws from the literature on sustainability and community development to assess fishing community sustainability around four broad categories: economics and markets; social and community; physical infrastructure and critical services; environment and regulation. Process steps included developing a project team and community coalition, analyzing baseline data, conducting interviews with waterfront stakeholders, hosting public workshops, and drafting a Fishing Community Sustainability Plan (FCSP) that includes concrete recommendations for how a community’s fishing industry and waterfront can be improved. Experiences from the four ports reveal that fishing community sustainability planning can be adapted to a variety of contexts and can contribute tangible benefits to communities. However, there are limitations to what community-scale planning can achieve, as many regulatory decisions that affect communities are enacted at the state or national level. Combining community-level planning with scaled-up fishing community sustainability planning efforts at the state and federal level could help overcome these limitations. FCSP planning is one tool fishing communities should consider as they seek to address threats and plan for their long-term viability.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurie Richmond & Robert Dumouchel & Henry Pontarelli & Laura Casali & Wyatt Smith & Kathryn Gillick & Pamela Godde & Michelle Dowling & Alyssa Suarez, 2019. "Fishing Community Sustainability Planning: A Roadmap and Examples from the California Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1904-:d:218457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrianto, Luky & Matsuda, Yoshiaki & Sakuma, Yoshiaki, 2005. "Assessing local sustainability of fisheries system: a multi-criteria participatory approach with the case of Yoron Island, Kagoshima prefecture, Japan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, January.
    2. Hanan Alhaddi, 2015. "Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 6-10, September.
    3. Jentoft, Svein, 2000. "The community: a missing link of fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 53-60, January.
    4. Ditty, J.M. & Rezende, C.E., 2014. "Unjust and unsustainable: A case study of the Açu port industrial complex," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 82-88.
    5. Swartz, Wilf & Rashid Sumaila, U. & Watson, Reg & Pauly, D., 2010. "Sourcing seafood for the three major markets: The EU, Japan and the USA," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1366-1373, November.
    6. James L Anderson & Christopher M Anderson & Jingjie Chu & Jennifer Meredith & Frank Asche & Gil Sylvia & Martin D Smith & Dessy Anggraeni & Robert Arthur & Atle Guttormsen & Jessica K McCluney & Tim W, 2015. "The Fishery Performance Indicators: A Management Tool for Triple Bottom Line Outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Mansouri, Mo & Nilchiani, Roshanak & Mostashari, Ali, 2010. "A policy making framework for resilient port infrastructure systems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1125-1134, November.
    8. John Dinwoodie & Sarah Tuck & Harriet Knowles & James Benhin & Mark Sansom, 2012. "Sustainable Development of Maritime Operations in Ports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 111-126, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuznetsov, Andrei & Dinwoodie, John & Gibbs, David & Sansom, Mark & Knowles, Harriet, 2015. "Towards a sustainability management system for smaller ports," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 59-68.
    2. Jean-Marc Douguet & Pierre Failler & Gianluca Ferraro, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of the Societal Costs of Fishing Activities in a Deliberative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Marianna Maruszczak & Natalia Drop & Piotr Durajczyk, 2021. "Identification of Areas of Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the Example of Polish and German Seaports in the Baltic Sea Region," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 394-409.
    4. Dana Miller & Stefano Mariani, 2013. "Irish fish, Irish people: roles and responsibilities for an emptying ocean," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 529-546, April.
    5. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios, 2021. "Bargaining for Community Fishing Quotas," MPRA Paper 107409, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hyung-Min Kim & Jonathan Grix, 2021. "Implementing a Sustainability Legacy Strategy: A Case Study of PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympic Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Voyer, Michelle & Gollan, Natalie & Barclay, Kate & Gladstone, William, 2015. "‘It׳s part of me’; understanding the values, images and principles of coastal users and their influence on the social acceptability of MPAs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 93-102.
    8. Jimin Shim & Joonho Moon & Won Seok Lee & Namho Chung, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Corporate Value of Restaurant Businesses Using Triple Bottom Line Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Giné, Xavier & Martinez-Bravo, Monica & Vidal-Fernández, Marian, 2017. "Are labor supply decisions consistent with neoclassical preferences? Evidence from Indian boat owners," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 331-347.
    10. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    11. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Ana-Maria Comandaru (Andrei) & Adriana Paduraru (Horaicu), 2021. "Harmonization Of Environmental Management Accounting - Tool For Managing Economic Reconfiguration," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 181-200, October.
    13. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Bjørndal, Trond & Lappo, Alena & Ramos, Jorge, 2015. "An economic analysis of the Portuguese fisheries sector 1960–2011," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 21-30.
    15. Camilla Salvatore & Silvia Biffignandi & Annamaria Bianchi, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Through Twitter: From Topic Model Analysis to Indexes Measuring Communication Characteristics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1217-1248, December.
    16. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Mateusz Tomanek, 2020. "Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Valenza, Giuseppe & Damiano, Rodolfo, 2023. "Sustainability reporting and public value: Evidence from port authorities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Bailey, Jennifer, 2016. "Adventures in cross-disciplinary studies: Grand strategy and fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 18-27.
    19. Jill H Swasey & Suzanne Iudicello & Graeme Parkes & Robert Trumble & Kara Stevens & Martha Silver & Cheri A Recchia, 2021. "The fisheries governance tool: A practical and accessible approach to evaluating management systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Harlina Suzana Jaafar & Mona Leza Abd Aziz & Muhammad Razif Ahmad & Nasruddin Faisol, 2021. "Creating Innovation in Achieving Sustainability: Halal-Friendly Sustainable Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1904-:d:218457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.