IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ierequ/v17y2022i4p1015-1050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusiveness as a key determinant of work engagement: evidence from V4 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Borisov

    (Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics; Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Hungary)

  • Szergej Vinogradov

    (Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics; Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Hungary)

Abstract

Research background: There is currently a need for empirical research regarding the validity of specific work environment model elements supported by strong statistical evidence. The amount of research conducted in this field has been particularly limited in Central-Eastern Europe. The desire to fill in these gaps was at least in part responsible for the uniqueness of the research approach and its differences from previous similar studies. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this study was to examine factors affecting employee engagement and to examine their relationship with each other using Visegrad countries as an example. Methods: The initial data is taken from the fourth European Company Survey (2019) for management respondents. After data cleaning, the sample sizes for Czechia, Hungary Poland, and Slovakia are N(CZ)=904, N(HU)=682, N(PL)=511, and N(SK)=361, respectively. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the following five dimensions were identified for this research: (1) inclusiveness, (2) empowerment, (3) work autonomy, (4) organizational learning environment, and (5) work engagement. An analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to determine the links that exist among these dimensions of a constructive work environment. Findings & value added: The structural model indicates that inclusiveness and empowerment have a significant positive impact on work engagement in all the countries examined. Inclusiveness was the strongest predictor of work engagement, followed by empowerment. Both of the two other predictors in the model (workplace autonomy and organizational learning environment) generally had less or no effect on employee engagement. The present study extends recent literature on work engagement by empirically validating the influence of workplace environment-related factors, as well as providing useful organizational policy recommendations for managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Borisov & Szergej Vinogradov, 2022. "Inclusiveness as a key determinant of work engagement: evidence from V4 countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 1015-1050, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:1015-1050
    DOI: 10.24136/eq.2022.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.034
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/eq.2022.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rowan Mulligan & José Ramos & Pilar Martín & Ana Zornoza, 2021. "Inspiriting Innovation: The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) on Innovative Behavior as Mediated by Mindfulness and Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1, May.
    2. Liu, Dong & Jiang, Kaifeng & Shalley, Christina E. & Keem, Sejin & Zhou, Jing, 2016. "Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 236-263.
    3. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    4. Trent A. Engbers & Michael F. Thompson & Timothy F. Slaper, 2017. "Theory and Measurement in Social Capital Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 537-558, June.
    5. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    6. Anna Kowalska & Jaroslav Kovarnik & Eva Hamplova & Pavel Prazak, 2018. "The Selected Topics for Comparison in Visegrad Four Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    8. Rob Eisinga & Manfred Grotenhuis & Ben Pelzer, 2013. "The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 637-642, August.
    9. Antonio Andreoni & Ha-Joon Chang & Mateus Labrunie, 2021. "Natura Non Facit Saltus: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Industrialisation Across Developing Countries," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 330-370, April.
    10. Kausel, Edgar E. & Slaughter, Jerel E., 2011. "Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 3-14, January.
    11. Janina Stankiewicz & Marta Moczulska, 2015. "The Involvement Of Employees In Knowledge Management In The Light Of The Research Results," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 6(2), pages 37-51, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Andruszkiewicz & Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezińska & Małgorzata Grzywińska-Rąpca & Paweł Dariusz Wiśniewski, 2023. "Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behavior of Representatives of Generation Z from the Example of Poland and Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gazi Md. Shakhawat Hossain & Md. Nayem Hossen & Md. Sharifur Rahman & Maruf Hasan, 2019. "Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Approach to Examining the Factors’ Affecting Work Life Balance among Female Teachers’: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(6), pages 140-152.
    2. Liu, Linlin & Lee, Matthew K.O. & Liu, Renjing & Chen, Jiawen, 2018. "Trust transfer in social media brand communities: The role of consumer engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Amer Rajput & Raja Zohaib Gahfoor, 2020. "Satisfaction and revisit intentions at fast food restaurants," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Pérez Granero, Luis & Guillén, Manuel & Bañón-Gomis, Alexis J., 2017. "Influencia de los factores de contingencia en el desarrollo del cuadro de mando integral y su asociación con un rendimiento mejor. El caso de las empresas españolas," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 82-94.
    5. Sobia Nasir & Muhammad Azam Roomi & Nadia Nasir & Waqas Khan & Muhammad Rashid, 2023. "Confrontation and Avoidance of Uncivil Behaviors in the Workplace: Empirical Evidence From the Tourism Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    6. Josette Dijkhuizen & Marjan Gorgievski & Marc Veldhoven & René Schalk, 2016. "Feeling successful as an entrepreneur: a job demands — resources approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 555-573, June.
    7. Park, Joonyong & Kim, Renee B., 2022. "Importance of offline service quality in building loyalty of OC service brand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina & Blanco-González, Alicia & Hernández-Perlines, Felipe, 2022. "The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Christos Gkartzonikas & Lisa Lorena Losada-Rojas & Sharon Christ & V. Dimitra Pyrialakou & Konstantina Gkritza, 2023. "A multi-group analysis of the behavioral intention to ride in autonomous vehicles: evidence from three U.S. metropolitan areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 635-675, April.
    10. Chandna, Vallari & Salimath, Manjula S., 2018. "Peer-to-peer selling in online platforms: A salient business model for virtual entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 162-174.
    11. Darcy, Simon & Burke, Paul Francis, 2018. "On the road again: The barriers and benefits of automobility for people with disability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 229-245.
    12. Karanges, Emma Ruth & Beatson, Amanda & Johnston, Kim & Lings, Ian, 2014. "Optimizing employee engagement with internal communication: A social exchange perspective," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 7(2), pages 329-353.
    13. Batia Ben-Hador & Eyal Eckhaus & Galit Klein, 2021. "Personal Social Capital in Organizations: A New Scale to Assess Internal and External Personal Social Capital in Organizations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 1155-1177, October.
    14. Cecilia Ramos-Estrada & María Teresa de la Garza Carranza & Jorge Armando López-Lemus & Quetzalli Atlatenco-Ibarra & Edgar René Vázquez-González, 2021. "Organizational Strategies and Their Impact on Employee Commitment during the Health Emergency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Raimundo Aguayo-Estremera & Gustavo R. Cañadas & Elena Ortega-Campos & Tania Ariza & Emilia Inmaculada De la Fuente-Solana, 2023. "Validity Evidence for the Internal Structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: A Comparison between Classical CFA Model and the ESEM and the Bifactor Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Uzma Tufail & Muhammad Shakil Ahmad & T. Ramayah & Farzand Ali Jan & Iqtidar Ali Shah, 2017. "Impact of Islamic Work Ethics on Organisational Citizenship Behaviours among Female Academic Staff: the Mediating Role of Employee Engagement," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(3), pages 693-717, September.
    17. Louis, Didier & Lombart, Cindy & Durif, Fabien, 2021. "Packaging-free products: A lever of proximity and loyalty between consumers and grocery stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Soane, Emma & Truss, Catherine & Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Rees, Chris & Gatenby, Mark, 2012. "Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: the ISA engagement scale," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63486, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Nazanin Naderiadib Alpler & Huseyin Arasli, 2020. "Can Hindrance Stressors Change the Nature of Perceived Employability? An Empirical Study in the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Salih Börteçine Avci & İsmail İyigün, 2017. "Corporate and supply chain network governance of third party logistics service providers: Effects on buyers’ intention to continue the relationship," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 277-296, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    empowerment; workplace autonomy; organizational learning environment; structural equation modeling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:1015-1050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.