IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-02806-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil liability for the actions of autonomous AI in healthcare: an invitation to further contemplation

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Eldakak

    (United Arab Emirates University
    Alexandria University)

  • Abdulla Alremeithi

    (United Arab Emirates University)

  • Emad Dahiyat

    (United Arab Emirates University)

  • Moatasem El-Gheriani

    (United Arab Emirates University
    Alexandria University)

  • Hassan Mohamed

    (United Arab Emirates University)

  • Mohammad Ibrahim Abdulrahim Abdulla

    (United Arab Emirates University)

Abstract

There are already a number of autonomous robots that play a significant role in improving the quality of healthcare in different areas ranging from basic health diagnosis to complex surgeries. However, using robots and machine learning applications in the healthcare context poses concerns over liability for patient injury. This paper will thus attempt to investigate the potential legal problems that might arise if AI technology evolves or is commonly used in clinical practice. It also examines whether the traditional doctrines of liability can adequately address the liability for the injuries stemming from acts of autonomous robots. As such, this paper adopted both descriptive and analytical methodologies to explore the main focus of the study. while the descriptive methodology was used to spot light on various theories of liability, the analytical methodology was used to critically examine the main theories that have been advanced to deal with autonomous robots and predict the necessity of legal reform. Throughout this paper, the authors insist on the importance of distinguishing between robots in light of their degree of autonomy and then drafting liability rules depending on whether the action was done autonomously by an unattended robot or whether it was done automatically by an attended robot. Finally, the paper concludes with the proposal of a series of factors to be considered for the future regulation of AI Robots in the healthcare context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Eldakak & Abdulla Alremeithi & Emad Dahiyat & Moatasem El-Gheriani & Hassan Mohamed & Mohammad Ibrahim Abdulrahim Abdulla, 2024. "Civil liability for the actions of autonomous AI in healthcare: an invitation to further contemplation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02806-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02806-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-02806-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-02806-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel P. Kessler, 2011. "Evaluating the Medical Malpractice System and Options for Reform," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(2), pages 93-110, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Panthöfer, 2022. "Do doctors prescribe antibiotics out of fear of malpractice?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 340-381, June.
    2. Ian A. MacKenzie & Markus Ohndorf, 2016. "Caps on Coasean transfers," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 566-584.
    3. James A. Brickley & Susan F. Lu & Gerard J. Wedig, 2022. "Are firms with ‘deep pockets’ more responsive to tort liability? Evidence from nursing homes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1590-1617, August.
    4. Andrew Friedson & Thomas Kniesner, 2012. "Losers and losers: Some demographics of medical malpractice tort reforms," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 115-133, October.
    5. Antoci, Angelo & Fiori Maccioni, Alessandro & Russu, Paolo & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2022. "Curing is caring? Liability reforms, defensive medicine and malpractice litigation in a post-pandemic world," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. T. Renee Bowen & David M. Kreps & Andrzej Skrzypacz, 2013. "Rules with Discretion and Local Information," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(3), pages 1273-1320.
    7. Jingshu Luo & Hua Chen & Martin Grace, 2022. "Medicaid expansion, tort reforms, and medical liability costs," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 789-821, September.
    8. Castro, M.F.; & Ferrara, P.; & Guccio, C.; & Lisi, D.;, 2018. "Medical Malpractice Liability and Physicians’ Behavior:Experimental Evidence," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/11, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    9. Laurence C. Baker & Kate Bundorf & Daniel Kessler, 2014. "Expanding Patients' Property Rights In Their Medical Records," NBER Working Papers 20565, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Castro, Massimo Finocchiaro & Ferrara, Paolo Lorenzo & Guccio, Calogero & Lisi, Domenico, 2019. "Medical malpractice liability and physicians’ behavior: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 646-666.
    11. Brian K. Chen & Chun‐Yuh Yang, 2014. "Increased Perception of Malpractice Liability and the Practice of Defensive Medicine," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 446-476, September.
    12. Laurence C. Baker & M. Kate Bundorf & Daniel P. Kessler, 2015. "Expanding Patients' Property Rights in Their Medical Records," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 1(1), pages 82-100, Winter.
    13. Finocchiaro Castro Massimo & Lisi Domenico & Romeo Domenica, 2024. "An Experimental Analysis of Patient Dumping Under Different Payment Systems," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1), pages 205-258, January.
    14. Sam Ransbotham & Eric M. Overby & Michael C. Jernigan, 2021. "Electronic Trace Data and Legal Outcomes: The Effect of Electronic Medical Records on Malpractice Claim Resolution Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4341-4361, July.
    15. Grigore TINICA & Mihaela TOMAZIU-TODOSIA & Gabriel-Catalin TOMAZIU-TODOSIA & Raluca Ozana CHISTOL & Diana BULGARU-ILIESCU & Cristina FURNICA, 2017. "Defensive Medicine: Myths and Realities," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Camelia IGNATESCU & Antonio SANDU & Tomita CIULEI (ed.), Rethinking Social Action. Core Values in Practice, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 82, pages 898-910, Editura Lumen.
    16. Pinka Chatterji & Siyang Li & Gerald R. Marschke, 2018. "Malpractice Reform and the Sorting of New Physicians by Medical Human Capital," NBER Working Papers 24401, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Nirup M. Menon & Rajiv Kohli, 2013. "Blunting Damocles' Sword: A Longitudinal Model of Healthcare IT Impact on Malpractice Insurance Premium and Quality of Patient Care," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 918-932, December.
    18. Paola Bertoli & Veronica Grembi, 2018. "Medical Malpractice: How Legal Liability Affects Medical Decisions," Contributions to Economic Analysis, in: Health Econometrics, volume 127, pages 235-261, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    19. Alberto Galasso & Hong Luo, 2016. "Tort Reform and Innovation," NBER Working Papers 22712, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Zhan Wang & Niying Li & Mengsi Jiang & Keith Dear & Chee-Ruey Hsieh, 2017. "Records of medical malpractice litigation: A potential indicator of healthcare quality in China," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-02806-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.