IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v68y2017i1d10.1057_s41274-016-0007-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizing the profit in customer’s order acceptance and scheduling problem with weighted tardiness penalty

Author

Listed:
  • Somaye Geramipour

    (Isfahan University of Technology)

  • Ghasem Moslehi

    (Isfahan University of Technology)

  • Mohammad Reisi-Nafchi

    (Isfahan University of Technology)

Abstract

The customer’s order acceptance and scheduling problem in a single machine environment has long been an appealing research subject. In this paper, a situation where a pool of customers exists and each customer tends to place all his orders to a single company is addressed. Hence, the customer’s orders will be entirely either accepted or rejected. In this work, decisions on rejection or acceptance of customers and sequencing of the accepted orders are simultaneously considered. The goal is to maximize the total net profit obtained from accepted orders revenues contributed by tardiness penalty. In response to the computational complexity of the problem, a heuristic algorithm and two optimal branch and bound procedures with upper bound, lower bound, and dominance rules are developed. Computational results demonstrate that the proposed methods perform well in a timely manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Somaye Geramipour & Ghasem Moslehi & Mohammad Reisi-Nafchi, 2017. "Maximizing the profit in customer’s order acceptance and scheduling problem with weighted tardiness penalty," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(1), pages 89-101, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:68:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0007-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41274-016-0007-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41274-016-0007-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41274-016-0007-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1157-1160, December.
    2. Kyparisis, George J. & Gupta, Sushil K. & Ip, Chi-Ming, 1996. "Project selection with discounted returns and multiple constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 87-96, October.
    3. J. J. Kanet, 2007. "New Precedence Theorems for One-Machine Weighted Tardiness," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 579-588, August.
    4. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    5. ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 1025-1031, October.
    6. Mestry, Siddharth & Damodaran, Purushothaman & Chen, Chin-Sheng, 2011. "A branch and price solution approach for order acceptance and capacity planning in make-to-order operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 480-495, June.
    7. Xiuli Wang & Guodong Huang & Xiuwu Hu & T C Edwin Cheng, 2015. "Order acceptance and scheduling on two identical parallel machines," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(10), pages 1755-1767, October.
    8. Sushil K. Gupta & Jerzy Kyparisis & Chi-Ming Ip, 1992. "Note---Project Selection and Sequencing to Maximize Net Present Value of the Total Return," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 751-752, May.
    9. Chris N. Potts & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 1985. "A Branch and Bound Algorithm for the Total Weighted Tardiness Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 363-377, April.
    10. Hamilton Emmons, 1969. "One-Machine Sequencing to Minimize Certain Functions of Job Tardiness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 701-715, August.
    11. S-W Lin & K-C Ying, 2013. "Increasing the total net revenue for single machine order acceptance and scheduling problems using an artificial bee colony algorithm," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(2), pages 293-311, February.
    12. Alidaee, Bahram & Kochenberger, Gary A. & Amini, Mohammad M., 2001. "Greedy solutions of selection and ordering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 203-215, October.
    13. A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan & B. J. Lageweg & J. K. Lenstra, 1975. "Minimizing Total Costs in One-Machine Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 908-927, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamadreza Dabiri & Mehdi Yazdani & Bahman Naderi & Hassan Haleh, 2022. "Modeling and solution methods for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with job rejection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2721-2765, July.
    2. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2020. "Minimizing maximum delivery completion time for order scheduling with rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1044-1064, November.
    3. Tarhan, İstenç & Oğuz, Ceyda, 2022. "A matheuristic for the generalized order acceptance and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 87-103.
    4. Naderi, Bahman & Roshanaei, Vahid, 2020. "Branch-Relax-and-Check: A tractable decomposition method for order acceptance and identical parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 811-827.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tarhan, İstenç & Oğuz, Ceyda, 2022. "A matheuristic for the generalized order acceptance and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 87-103.
    2. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Rostami, Salim & Creemers, Stefan & Leus, Roel, 2019. "Precedence theorems and dynamic programming for the single-machine weighted tardiness problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 43-49.
    4. John J. Kanet, 2014. "One-Machine Sequencing to Minimize Total Tardiness: A Fourth Theorem for Emmons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 345-347, April.
    5. Silva, Marco & Poss, Michael & Maculan, Nelson, 2020. "Solution algorithms for minimizing the total tardiness with budgeted processing time uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 70-82.
    6. Richard K. Congram & Chris N. Potts & Steef L. van de Velde, 2002. "An Iterated Dynasearch Algorithm for the Single-Machine Total Weighted Tardiness Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 52-67, February.
    7. Mestry, Siddharth & Damodaran, Purushothaman & Chen, Chin-Sheng, 2011. "A branch and price solution approach for order acceptance and capacity planning in make-to-order operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 480-495, June.
    8. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    9. Wang, Xiuli & Zhu, Qianqian & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "Subcontracting price schemes for order acceptance and scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Xin Li & José A. Ventura & Kevin A. Bunn, 2021. "A joint order acceptance and scheduling problem with earliness and tardiness penalties considering overtime," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-68, February.
    11. Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Regan, Amelia C. & Ranaiefar, Fatemeh & Arkhipov, Dmitri I., 2011. "A network option portfolio management framework for adaptive transportation planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 765-778, October.
    12. Louis-Philippe Bigras & Michel Gamache & Gilles Savard, 2008. "Time-Indexed Formulations and the Total Weighted Tardiness Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 133-142, February.
    13. J. J. Kanet, 2007. "New Precedence Theorems for One-Machine Weighted Tardiness," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 579-588, August.
    14. Tan, K. C. & Narasimhan, R., 1997. "Minimizing tardiness on a single processor with sequence-dependent setup times: a simulated annealing approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 619-634, December.
    15. Su, Ling-Huey & Chen, Chung-Jung, 2008. "Minimizing total tardiness on a single machine with unequal release dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 496-503, April.
    16. Tan, Keah-Choon & Narasimhan, Ram & Rubin, Paul A. & Ragatz, Gary L., 2000. "A comparison of four methods for minimizing total tardiness on a single processor with sequence dependent setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 313-326, June.
    17. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2019. "New results for single-machine scheduling with past-sequence-dependent setup times and due date-related objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 149-159.
    18. World Bank, 2002. "Costa Rica : Social Spending and the Poor, Volume 1. Summary of Issues and Recommendations with Executive Summary," World Bank Publications - Reports 15330, The World Bank Group.
    19. Hernández-Hernández, M.E. & Kolokoltsov, V.N. & Toniazzi, L., 2017. "Generalised fractional evolution equations of Caputo type," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 184-196.
    20. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:68:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1057_s41274-016-0007-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.