IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jmarka/v7y2019i4d10.1057_s41270-019-00062-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a two-part mixed-effects model for understanding daily, individual-level media behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Shelley A. Blozis

    (University of California)

  • Ricardo Villarreal

    (University of San Francisco)

  • Sweta Thota

    (University of San Francisco)

  • Nicholas Imparato

    (University of San Francisco)

Abstract

This study supports a strategic analytics proposal, namely that there is conceptual and practical utility in applying a two-part mixed-effects model for understanding individual differences in daily media use. Individual-level daily diary measures of media use typically contain information about a person’s likeliness to use media, extent of usage, and variation in use across days that, taken together, can provide data for evaluating media behavior that is otherwise masked by using aggregate measures. The statistical framework developed and demonstrated here focuses on these three metrics. The approach, applied to daily diary measures of television use in a large, representative U.S. sample, yields results that add value when weighing media strategies centered on the twin tactics of reach and frequency. The implications for the proposed analytic strategy are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelley A. Blozis & Ricardo Villarreal & Sweta Thota & Nicholas Imparato, 2019. "Using a two-part mixed-effects model for understanding daily, individual-level media behavior," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(4), pages 234-250, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:7:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-019-00062-7
    DOI: 10.1057/s41270-019-00062-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41270-019-00062-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41270-019-00062-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray Aitkin, 1987. "Modelling Variance Heterogeneity in Normal Regression Using GLIM," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 36(3), pages 332-339, November.
    2. Klaus Larsen & Jørgen Holm Petersen & Esben Budtz-Jørgensen & Lars Endahl, 2000. "Interpreting Parameters in the Logistic Regression Model with Random Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 909-914, September.
    3. La Ferle, Carrie & Lee, Wei-Na, 2005. "Can English Language Media Connect with Ethnic Audiences? Ethnic Minorities' Media Use and Representation Perceptions," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 140-153, March.
    4. Harvey, A C, 1976. "Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(3), pages 461-465, May.
    5. Chen Lin & Sriram Venkataraman & Sandy D. Jap, 2013. "Media Multiplexing Behavior: Implications for Targeting and Media Planning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 310-324, March.
    6. Shu Xu & Shelley A. Blozis, 2011. "Sensitivity Analysis of Mixed Models for Incomplete Longitudinal Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(2), pages 237-256, April.
    7. Liu, Lei & Strawderman, Robert L. & Cowen, Mark E. & Shih, Ya-Chen T., 2010. "A flexible two-part random effects model for correlated medical costs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 110-123, January.
    8. Duan, Naihua, et al, 1983. "A Comparison of Alternative Models for the Demand for Medical Care," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 1(2), pages 115-126, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Tsung-Chi, 2012. "On simultaneously identifying outliers and heteroscedasticity without specific form," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2258-2272.
    2. Tsung-Shan Tsou, 2005. "Inferences of variance function - a parametric robust way," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 785-796.
    3. Cheng, Tsung-Chi, 2011. "Robust diagnostics for the heteroscedastic regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1845-1866, April.
    4. Li, Kim-Hung & Chan, Nai Ng, 2000. "Degeneracy in Heteroscedastic Regression Models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 282-295, August.
    5. Liu-Cang Wu & Zhong-Zhan Zhang & Deng-Ke Xu, 2012. "Variable selection in joint mean and variance models of Box--Cox transformation," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(12), pages 2543-2555, August.
    6. Cysneiros, Francisco José A. & Paula, Gilberto A. & Galea, Manuel, 2007. "Heteroscedastic symmetrical linear models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(11), pages 1084-1090, June.
    7. Xu, Dengke & Zhang, Zhongzhan, 2013. "A semiparametric Bayesian approach to joint mean and variance models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(7), pages 1624-1631.
    8. Wouterse, Bram & Huisman, Martijn & Meijboom, Bert R. & Deeg, Dorly J.H. & Polder, Johan J., 2013. "Modeling the relationship between health and health care expenditures using a latent Markov model," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 423-439.
    9. Yeşim Güney & Yetkin Tuaç & Şenay Özdemir & Olcay Arslan, 2021. "Robust estimation and variable selection in heteroscedastic regression model using least favorable distribution," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 805-827, June.
    10. Liucang Wu & Huiqiong Li, 2012. "Variable selection for joint mean and dispersion models of the inverse Gaussian distribution," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(6), pages 795-808, August.
    11. Donald Hedeker & Robin J. Mermelstein & Hakan Demirtas, 2008. "An Application of a Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model for Analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 627-634, June.
    12. Afrânio M.C. Vieira & Roseli A. Leandro & Clarice G.B. Dem�trio & Geert Molenberghs, 2011. "Double generalized linear model for tissue culture proportion data: a Bayesian perspective," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 1717-1731, September.
    13. George Leckie & Robert French & Chris Charlton & William Browne, 2014. "Modeling Heterogeneous Variance–Covariance Components in Two-Level Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(5), pages 307-332, October.
    14. Bram Wouterse & Bert R. Meijboom & Johan J. Polder, 2011. "The relationship between baseline health and longitudinal costs of hospital use," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(8), pages 985-1008, August.
    15. Alejandra Tapia & Victor Leiva & Maria del Pilar Diaz & Viviana Giampaoli, 2019. "Influence diagnostics in mixed effects logistic regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 920-942, September.
    16. Yang Lu, 2019. "Flexible (panel) regression models for bivariate count–continuous data with an insurance application," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1503-1521, October.
    17. Brown, Sarah & Greene, William H. & Harris, Mark N. & Taylor, Karl, 2015. "An inverse hyperbolic sine heteroskedastic latent class panel tobit model: An application to modelling charitable donations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 228-236.
    18. Ed Westerhout & Kees Folmer, 2007. "Co-payment systems in health care; between moral hazard and risk reduction," CPB Discussion Paper 78.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    19. Jenkins, Robin R. & Martinez, Salvador A. & Palmer, Karen & Podolsky, Michael J., 2003. "The determinants of household recycling: a material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 294-318, March.
    20. Panayi, Efstathios & Peters, Gareth W. & Danielsson, Jon & Zigrand, Jean-Pierre, 2018. "Designating market maker behaviour in limit order book markets," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 20-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:7:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-019-00062-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.