IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jmarka/v5y2017i3d10.1057_s41270-017-0022-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical perceptual maps: using confidence region ellipses to enhance the interpretations of brand positions in multidimensional scaling

Author

Listed:
  • Dawn Iacobucci

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Doug Grisaffe

    (University of Texas at Arlington)

  • Wayne DeSarbo

    (Pennsylvania State University)

Abstract

Positioning is among a marketer’s preeminent strategic responsibilities. Positioning helps to clarify brand strengths among competitors and identify potential challenges of similar brands and possible substitutability. Assessments of positioning, from initial marketplace efforts to resources directed at modifications and re-positioning, are frequently assisted by the graphical representations of brands in multidimensional space. Such perceptual maps are constructed to reflect the closeness of brands and therefore the extent to which they are seen as interchangeable, versus distances between brands representing their relative positioning distinctiveness. To create perceptual maps, data are frequently obtained that comprise a sample of respondents rating a series of brands with respect to their perceived similarities and differences, as well as the status of each brand along multiple attributes. This research uses the variability inherent in such three-dimensional data to construct confidence regions around point estimates in perceptual maps. Current maps tend to be simply descriptive, with positions reflected by point estimates, but multivariate models including multidimensional scaling and multi-mode factor analysis can be modified to extract the subject heterogeneity and derive inferential perceptual maps. Confidence regions that overlap will indicate more clearly an inference of brand similarity, whereas non-overlapping regions imply statistically differentiated brand perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawn Iacobucci & Doug Grisaffe & Wayne DeSarbo, 2017. "Statistical perceptual maps: using confidence region ellipses to enhance the interpretations of brand positions in multidimensional scaling," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 81-98, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:5:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1057_s41270-017-0022-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41270-017-0022-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41270-017-0022-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41270-017-0022-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    2. J. Ramsay, 1980. "Some small sample results for maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 139-144, March.
    3. DeSarbo, Wayne S. & De Soete, Geert & Eliashberg, Jehoshua, 1987. "A new stochastic multidimensional unfolding model for the investigation of paired comparison consumer preference/choice data," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 357-384, September.
    4. Pieter Kroonenberg & Jan Leeuw, 1980. "Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 69-97, March.
    5. David B. MacKay & Joseph L. Zinnes, 1986. "A Probabilistic Model for the Multidimensional Scaling of Proximity and Preference Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 325-344.
    6. Gert Storms, 1995. "On the robustness of maximum likelihood scaling for violations of the error model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 247-258, June.
    7. Jos Berge & Nikolaos Sidiropoulos, 2002. "On uniqueness in candecomp/parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 399-409, September.
    8. Joonwook Park & Priyali Rajagopal & Wayne DeSarbo, 2012. "A New Heterogeneous Multidimensional Unfolding Procedure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 263-287, April.
    9. Sharon Weinberg & J. Carroll & Harvey Cohen, 1984. "Confidence regions for INDSCAL using the jackknife and bootstrap techniques," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 475-491, December.
    10. Suzanne Winsberg & Geert Soete, 1993. "A latent class approach to fitting the weighted Euclidean model, clascal," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 315-330, June.
    11. J. Carroll & Jih-Jie Chang, 1970. "Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(3), pages 283-319, September.
    12. Ledyard Tucker, 1972. "Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 3-27, March.
    13. J. Ramsay, 1969. "Some statistical considerations in multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(2), pages 167-182, June.
    14. Forrest Young & Yoshio Takane & Rostyslaw Lewyckyj, 1978. "Three notes on ALSCAL," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 433-435, September.
    15. Ledyard Tucker, 1966. "Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(3), pages 279-311, September.
    16. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    17. Harshman, Richard A. & Lundy, Margaret E., 1994. "PARAFAC: Parallel factor analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 39-72, August.
    18. Wayne DeSarbo & Daniel Howard & Kamel Jedidi, 1991. "Multiclus: A new method for simultaneously performing multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 121-136, March.
    19. Tomasi, Giorgio & Bro, Rasmus, 2006. "A comparison of algorithms for fitting the PARAFAC model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(7), pages 1700-1734, April.
    20. P. Bentler & Sik-Yum Lee, 1978. "Statistical aspects of a three-mode factor analysis model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 343-352, September.
    21. J. Vera & Rodrigo Macías & Willem Heiser, 2009. "A Latent Class Multidimensional Scaling Model for Two-Way One-Mode Continuous Rating Dissimilarity Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 297-315, June.
    22. Kamel Jedidi & Wayne DeSarbo, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the spatial representation of three-mode, three-way pick any/J data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 471-494, September.
    23. J. Ramsay, 1977. "Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(2), pages 241-266, June.
    24. Wayne DeSarbo & Jaewun Cho, 1989. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling vector threshold model for the spatial representation of “pick any/n” data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 105-129, March.
    25. Laura Bocci & Maurizio Vichi, 2011. "The K-INDSCAL Model for Heterogeneous Three-Way Dissimilarity Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 691-714, October.
    26. Yoshio Takane, 1981. "Multidimensional successive categories scaling: A maximum likelihood method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 9-28, March.
    27. J. Ramsay, 1978. "Confidence regions for multidimensional scaling analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(2), pages 145-160, June.
    28. Joseph Zinnes & David MacKay, 1983. "Probabilistic multidimensional scaling: Complete and incomplete data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 27-48, March.
    29. Ledyard Tucker & Samuel Messick, 1963. "An individual differences model for multidimensional scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 28(4), pages 333-367, December.
    30. Wayne DeSarbo & Joonwook Park & Crystal Scott, 2008. "A Model-Based Approach for Visualizing the Dimensional Structure of Ordered Successive Categories Preference Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jared M. Hansen & Paul Wilson, 2023. "Modeling and explaining the growth patterns over time of country-specific website clickstream metrics," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 561-576, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abe, Makoto, 1998. "Error structure and identification condition in maximum likelihood nonmetric multidimensional scaling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 216-227, December.
    2. Henk Kiers, 1991. "Hierarchical relations among three-way methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 449-470, September.
    3. Paolo Giordani & Roberto Rocci & Giuseppe Bove, 2020. "Factor Uniqueness of the Structural Parafac Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 555-574, September.
    4. Richard Harshman & Margaret Lundy, 1996. "Uniqueness proof for a family of models sharing features of Tucker's three-mode factor analysis and PARAFAC/candecomp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 133-154, March.
    5. Stegeman, Alwin, 2014. "Finding the limit of diverging components in three-way Candecomp/Parafac—A demonstration of its practical merits," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 203-216.
    6. Alwin Stegeman, 2018. "Simultaneous Component Analysis by Means of Tucker3," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 21-47, March.
    7. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Willem Kloot & Pieter Kroonenberg, 1985. "External analysis with three-mode principal component models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 479-494, December.
    9. Pieter M. Kroonenberg & Cornelis J. Lammers & Ineke Stoop, 1985. "Three-Mode Principal Component Analysis of Multivariate Longitudinal Organizational Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 14(2), pages 99-136, November.
    10. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Other publications TiSEM f72cc9d8-f370-43aa-a224-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Tammo H.A. Bijmolt & Michel Wedel & Wayne S. DeSarbo, 2021. "Adaptive Multidimensional Scaling: Brand Positioning Based on Decision Sets and Dissimilarity Judgments," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Christian Genest & Johanna G. Nešlehová, 2014. "A Conversation with James O. Ramsay," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 161-183, August.
    13. Alwin Stegeman & Tam Lam, 2014. "Three-Mode Factor Analysis by Means of Candecomp/Parafac," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 426-443, July.
    14. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Wedel, M., 1996. "A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Multidimensional Scaling Methods," Research Memorandum 725, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Yoshio Takane & J. Carroll, 1981. "Nonmetric maximum likelihood multidimensional scaling from directional rankings of similarities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 389-405, December.
    16. Kohn, Hans-Friedrich, 2006. "Combinatorial individual differences scaling within the city-block metric," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 931-946, November.
    17. Veldscholte, Carla M. & Kroonenberg, Pieter M. & Antonides, Gerrit, 1998. "Three-mode analysis of perceptions of economic activities in Eastern and Western Europe1," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 321-351, June.
    18. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    19. Hildebrandt, Lutz & Klapper, Daniel, 1997. "Möglichkeiten und Ansätze der Analyse dreimodaler Daten für die Marktforschung," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,90, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    20. Elrod, Terry & Keane, Michael, 1995. "A Factor-Analytic Probit Model for Representing the Market Structure in Panel Data," MPRA Paper 52434, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:5:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1057_s41270-017-0022-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.