IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v29y2017i5d10.1057_s41287-016-0072-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Moe Fejerskov

    (Danish Institute for International Studies)

  • Erik Lundsgaarde

    (Danish Institute for International Studies)

  • Signe Cold-Ravnkilde

    (Danish Institute for International Studies)

Abstract

The rising prominence of new state and non-state actors in development cooperation has stimulated extensive discussion over the last decade. This article reviews and critically reflects on the present and future directions of this body of scholarship. It questions the homogeneity of actor constellations, relationships and ideas as they are currently conceptualised. The article argues for the importance of adopting more analytically and conceptually diverse approaches to study the interaction between heterogeneous development actors and homogenising forces, recognising the complexity and (dis)continuities of stability and change in the field of development cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:29:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41287-016-0072-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41287-016-0072-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41287-016-0072-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41287-016-0072-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Gore & Charles Gore, 2013. "The New Development Cooperation Landscape: Actors, Approaches, Architecture," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 769-786, August.
    2. Fuchs, Andreas & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2013. "The Needy Donor: An Empirical Analysis of India’s Aid Motives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 110-128.
    3. Dreher, Axel & Nunnenkamp, Peter & Thiele, Rainer, 2011. "Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between nonDAC and DAC Donor Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1950-1968.
    4. Michael Blowfield & Catherine S. Dolan, 2014. "Business as a development agent: evidence of possibility and improbability," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 22-42, January.
    5. Oliver Stuenkel, 2013. "Rising Powers and the Future of Democracy Promotion: the case of Brazil and India," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 339-355.
    6. Lisa Ann Richey & Stefano Ponte, 2014. "New actors and alliances in development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. John de Sousa, Sarah-Lea, 2010. "Brazil as an emerging actor in international development cooperation: a good partner for European donors?," Briefing Papers 5/2010, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Lisa Richey & Stefano Ponte, 2008. "Better (Red)™ than Dead? Celebrities, consumption and international aid," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 711-729.
    9. Lundsgaarde, Erik & Funk, Evelyn & Kopyra, Anja & Richter, Jennifer & Steinfeldt, Hannah, 2012. "Private foundations and development cooperation: insights from Tanzania," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 69, number 69.
    10. Adam Moe Fejerskov, 2016. "Understanding the nature of change: how institutional perspectives can inform contemporary studies of development cooperation," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(12), pages 2176-2191, December.
    11. Silke Weinlich, 2014. "Emerging powers at the UN: ducking for cover?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1829-1844, November.
    12. Nicola Banks & David Hulme, 2014. "New development alternatives or business as usual with a new face? The transformative potential of new actors and alliances in development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 181-195, January.
    13. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    14. Sato, Jin & Shiga, Hiroaki & Kobayashi, Takaaki & Kondoh, Hisahiro, 2011. "“Emerging Donors” from a Recipient Perspective: An Institutional Analysis of Foreign Aid in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 2091-2104.
    15. Ben Jones & Marie Petersen, 2011. "Instrumental, Narrow, Normative? Reviewing recent work on religion and development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 1291-1306.
    16. Adam Moe Fejerskov, 2015. "From Unconventional to Ordinary? The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Homogenizing Effects of International Development Cooperation," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(7), pages 1098-1112, October.
    17. Clist, Paul, 2011. "25Years of Aid Allocation Practice: Whither Selectivity?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1724-1734.
    18. Peter Kragelund, 2008. "The Return of Non-DAC Donors to Africa: New Prospects for African Development?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 26(5), pages 555-584, September.
    19. Tsang, Eric W. K., 2014. "Old and New," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(03), pages 390-390, November.
    20. Sebastian Paulo & Helmut Reisen, 2010. "Eastern Donors and Western Soft Law: Towards a DAC Donor Peer Review of China and India?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 28(5), pages 535-552, September.
    21. Willem Elbers & Lau Schulpen, 2015. "Reinventing International Development NGOs – The Case of ICCO," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 27(1), pages 1-18, January.
    22. Richard Manning, 2006. "Will 'Emerging Donors' Change the Face of International Co-operation?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 24(4), pages 371-385, July.
    23. Fahimul Quadir, 2013. "Rising Donors and the New Narrative of ‘South–South’ Cooperation: what prospects for changing the landscape of development assistance programmes?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 321-338.
    24. Simon Lightfoot, 2010. "The Europeanisation of International Development Policies: The Case of Central and Eastern European States," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 329-350.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    2. Keijzer, Niels & Lundsgaarde, Erik, 2018. "When ‘unintended effects’ reveal hidden intentions: Implications of ‘mutual benefit’ discourses for evaluating development cooperation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 210-217.
    3. Ali, Murad, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation in South-South Cooperation: the case of CPEC in Pakistan," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Minna-Liina Ojala & Lauri Hooli, 2022. "Development Cooperation as a Knowledge Creation Process: Rhythmanalytical Approach to a Capacity-Building Project in Zanzibar," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 367-386, February.
    5. Signe Marie Cold-Ravnkilde, 2019. "Contested norms in fragmented institutions: Gender equality in South Africa’s development cooperation," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 19(3), pages 211-231, July.
    6. Helen Wadham & Cathy Urquhart & Richard Warren, 2019. "Living with Paradox in International Development: An Extended Case Study of an International NGO," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1263-1286, December.
    7. José Antonio Alonso & Guillermo Santander, 2022. "Triangular Cooperation: Change or Continuity?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 248-271, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillon, Marlène & Mathonnat, Jacky, 2020. "What can we learn on Chinese aid allocation motivations from available data? A sectorial analysis of Chinese aid to African countries," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Alexis Gutiérrez & Dany Jaimovich, 2017. "A new player in the international development community? Chile as an emerging donor," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(6), pages 839-858, November.
    3. Kilama, Eric Gabin, 2016. "The influence of China and emerging donors aid allocation: A recipient perspective," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 76-91.
    4. Katarzyna Andrzejczak & Agata Kliber, 2015. "The Model of French Development Assistance – Who Gets the Help?," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 15, pages 89-109.
    5. Yunus Turhan, 2022. "Turkey as an emerging donor in the development community: The Turkish‐type Development Assistance Model (TDAM)," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.
    6. Finn Ole Semrau & Rainer Thiele, 2017. "Brazil's Development Cooperation: Following in China's and India's Footsteps?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 287-307, April.
    7. Sandra H Bry, 2017. "The Evolution of South-South Development Cooperation: Guiding Principles and Approaches," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(1), pages 160-175, January.
    8. Marlène Guillon & Jacky Mathonnat, 2019. "What can we learn on Chinese aid allocation motivations from available data ? A sectorial analysis of Chinese aid to African countries," Post-Print hal-02005784, HAL.
    9. Broich, Tobias, 2017. "Do authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development finance than democratic ones? Empirical evidence for Africa," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-207.
    10. Dreher, Axel & Nunnenkamp, Peter & Thiele, Rainer, 2010. "Are 'new' donors different? Comparing the allocation of bilateral aid between non-DAC and DAC donor," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 96, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    11. Angelika J. Budjan & Andreas Fuchs, 2021. "Democracy and Aid Donorship," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 217-238, November.
    12. Dreher, Axel & Nunnenkamp, Peter & Thiele, Rainer, 2011. "Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between nonDAC and DAC Donor Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1950-1968.
    13. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2017. "Understanding the Role of National Development Experts in Development Ethnography," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(1), pages 39-63, January.
    14. Asmus, Gerda & Eichenauer, Vera & Fuchs, Andreas & Parks, Bradley, 2021. "Does India use development finance to compete with China? A subnational analysis," Kiel Working Papers 2189, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Fuchs, Andreas & Klann, Nils-Hendrik, 2013. "Emergency Aid 2.0," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79898, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Joren Verschaeve & Jan Orbie, 2018. "Ignoring the elephant in the room? Assessing the impact of the European Union on the Development Assistance Committee's role in international development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 44-58, March.
    17. Marlène GUILLON & Jacky MATHONNAT, 2017. "Is there a strategy in China’s health official development assistance to African countries?," Working Papers 201710, CERDI.
    18. Eric Gabin Kilama, 2014. "Recipients aid absorption in the new development cooperation landscape," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 1929-1944.
    19. Furukawa, Mitsuaki, 2014. "Management of the International Development Aid System Aid System and the Creation of Political Space for China:The Case of Tanzania," Working Papers 82, JICA Research Institute.
    20. Fuchs, Andreas & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2013. "The Needy Donor: An Empirical Analysis of India’s Aid Motives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 110-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:29:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1057_s41287-016-0072-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.