IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v43y2012i6p1185-1209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Cheryl McEwan
  • Emma Mawdsley

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:43:y:2012:i:6:p:1185-1209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01805.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nagesh Kumar, 2008. "South-South and Triangular Cooperation in Asia-Pacific : Towards a New Paradigm in Development Cooperation," Development Economics Working Papers 22112, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. World Bank, 2011. "Global Development Horizons 2011 : Multipolarity - The New Global Economy," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2313, December.
    3. Hong-Min Chun & Elijah N. Munyi & Heejin Lee, 2010. "South Korea as an emerging donor: Challenges and changes on its entering OECD|DAC," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 788-802.
    4. James Scott & Matthias vom Hau & David Hulme, 2010. "Beyond the BICs: identifying the ‘emerging middle powers’ and understanding their role in global poverty reduction," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 13710, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    5. Andrew Rogerson, 2005. "Aid Harmonisation and Alignment: Bridging the Gaps between Reality and the Paris Reform Agenda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 23(5), pages 531-552, September.
    6. Chahoud, Tatjana, 2008. "Financing for development series: Southern Non-DAC Actors in development cooperation," Briefing Papers 13/2008, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Geske Dijkstra & Kristin Komives, 2011. "The PRS Approach and the Paris Agenda: Experiences in Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 23(2), pages 191-207, April.
    8. John de Sousa, Sarah-Lea, 2010. "Brazil as an emerging actor in international development cooperation: a good partner for European donors?," Briefing Papers 5/2010, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    9. Giles Mohan & Marcus Power, 2008. "New African Choices? The Politics of Chinese Engagement," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(115), pages 23-42, March.
    10. Kang, Sung Jin & Lee, Hongshik & Park, Bokyeong, 2011. "Does Korea follow Japan in foreign aid? Relationships between aid and foreign investment," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 19-27, January.
    11. Harry G. Broadman, 2007. "Africa's Silk Road : China and India's New Economic Frontier," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7186, December.
    12. Sebastian Paulo & Helmut Reisen, 2010. "Eastern Donors and Western Soft Law: Towards a DAC Donor Peer Review of China and India?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 28(5), pages 535-552, September.
    13. Myriam Dahman Saidi & Christina Wolf, 2011. "Recalibrating Development Co-operation: How Can African Countries Benefit from Emerging Partners?," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 302, OECD Publishing.
    14. Goran Hyden, 2008. "After the Paris Declaration: Taking on the Issue of Power," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 26(3), pages 259-274, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi‐Chen Wu & Shiuh‐Shen Chien, 2022. "Northernization for Breaking‐through International Isolation: Taiwan’s Trilateral Aid Cooperation in the Middle East Refugee Crisis and beyond," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.
    2. Marco Liverani & Kayla Song & James W. Rudge, 2023. "Mapping emerging trends and South–South cooperation in regional knowledge networks: A bibliometric analysis of avian influenza research in Southeast Asia," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 1667-1683, October.
    3. Haug, Sebastian, 2021. "Mainstreaming South-South and triangular cooperation: Work in progress at the United Nations," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Amanor, Kojo S. & Chichava, Sérgio, 2016. "South–South Cooperation, Agribusiness, and African Agricultural Development: Brazil and China in Ghana and Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 13-23.
    5. Shankland, Alex & Gonçalves, Euclides, 2016. "Imagining Agricultural Development in South–South Cooperation: The Contestation and Transformation of ProSAVANA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 35-46.
    6. Gabriella Carolini & Daniel Gallagher & Isadora Cruxên, 2018. "The promise of proximity: The politics of knowledge and learning in South–South cooperation between water operators," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(7), pages 1157-1175, November.
    7. Cardoso, Andrea & Turhan, Ethemcan, 2018. "Examining new geographies of coal: Dissenting energyscapes in Colombia and Turkey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 398-408.
    8. Katarzyna Andrzejczak & Agata Kliber, 2015. "The Model of French Development Assistance – Who Gets the Help?," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 15, pages 89-109.
    9. de Moraes Achcar, Helena, 2022. "South-South cooperation and the re-politicization of development in health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111947, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    11. Rahman, Md Saifur & Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Giessen, Lukas, 2016. "Foreign donors driving policy change in recipient countries: Three decades of development aid towards community-based forest policy in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 39-53.
    12. Milena Lopreite & Michelangelo Puliga & Massimo Riccaboni, 2018. "The Global Health Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Tuberculosis, Malaria and Pneumonia Using Social Media Data," Working Papers 01/2018, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Jan 2018.
    13. de Moraes Achcar, Helena, 2022. "South-South cooperation and the re-politicization of development in health," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    15. Hinojosa Flores, Isaías Daniel & Skutsch, Margaret & Mustalahti, Irmeli, 2016. "Impacts of Finnish cooperation in the Mexican policy making process: From the community forest management to the liberalization of forest services," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 229-238.
    16. Joren Verschaeve & Jan Orbie, 2018. "Ignoring the elephant in the room? Assessing the impact of the European Union on the Development Assistance Committee's role in international development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 44-58, March.
    17. Marianne Schmink & Jennifer Cairns Smart & Isabel Sitoe & Walter Bowen & Henoque Ribeiro Silva & Carvalho Carlos Ecole & Lenita Haber, 2020. "Challenges and opportunities of trilateral co‐operation: Collaboration by the USA, Brazil and Mozambique on horticultural research, 2011–2015," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(5), pages 575-593, September.
    18. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2017. "Converging divergence? Unpacking the new geography of 21st century global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 102017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    19. Rudolph, Alexandra, 2017. "The concept of SDG-sensitive development cooperation: implications for OECD-DAC members," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    20. José Antonio Alonso & Guillermo Santander, 2022. "Triangular Cooperation: Change or Continuity?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 248-271, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sung-Mi Kim, 2017. "International Perceptions of South Korea as Development Partner: Attractions and Strategic Implications," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1086-1101, November.
    2. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    3. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Institutional bypass and aid effectiveness in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-22, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. William Hynes & Patrick Holden, 2012. "What future for the Global Aid for Trade Initiative? Towards a fairer assessment of its achievements and limitations," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp421, IIIS.
    5. Matthew Dornan, 2017. "How new is the ‘new’ conditionality? Recipient perspectives on aid, country ownership and policy reform," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 46-63, July.
    6. Yi‐Chen Wu & Shiuh‐Shen Chien, 2022. "Northernization for Breaking‐through International Isolation: Taiwan’s Trilateral Aid Cooperation in the Middle East Refugee Crisis and beyond," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.
    7. Lena Gutheil & Dirk‐Jan Koch, 2023. "Civil society organizations and managerialism: On the depoliticization of the adaptive management agenda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    8. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Bypassing Government: Aid Effectiveness and Malawi’s Local Development Fund," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 103-116.
    9. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    10. Samuel Brazys & Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati, 2021. "Aid curse with Chinese characteristics? Chinese development flows and economic reforms," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 407-430, September.
    11. Klingebiel, Stephan & Leiderer, Stefan & Schmidt, Petra, 2007. "Wie wirksam sind neue Modalitäten der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit? Erste Erfahrungen mit Programme-Based Approaches (PBAs)," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2007, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2013. "Earth Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14673.
    13. Broich, Tobias, 2017. "Do authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development finance than democratic ones? Empirical evidence for Africa," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-207.
    14. Peter Nunnenkamp & Rainer Thiele, 2013. "Financing for Development: The Gap between Words and Deeds since Monterrey," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(1), pages 75-98, January.
    15. He, Yong, 2013. "Does China's trade expansion help African development? — an empirical estimation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 28-38.
    16. Jahan Ara Peerally & John Cantwell, 2011. "The Impact Of Trade Policy Regimes On Firms' Learning For Innovation From Suppliers," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 29-68.
    17. Xia, Ying & Chen, Muyang, 2023. "The Janus face of stateness: China's development-oriented equity investments in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Carmody, Pádraig, 2009. "An Asian-Driven Economic Recovery in Africa? The Zambian Case," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 1197-1207, July.
    19. Mustafa Sakr & Andre Jordaan, 2016. "Emerging Multinational Corporations: A Prominent Player in the Global Economy," Working Papers 201623, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    20. Lohi Julie, 2013. "The Implications of HO and IRS Theories in Bilateral Trade Flows within Sub-Saharan Africa," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 175-202, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:43:y:2012:i:6:p:1185-1209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.