IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pai/apunup/es-26-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La eficiencia de la economía campesina: concepto aplicable en el Perú

Author

Listed:
  • Sandro Borda
  • Álvaro Quijandría

Abstract

En el presente artículo, los autores investigan acerca de la eficiencia económica de la agricultura campesina en la sierra del Perú. Tratan de rescatar el contenido teórico de la hipótesis "Eficientes pero Pobres" de Theodore Schultz. Definiendo claramente el concepto de eficiencia económica y realizando un ejercicio de programación lineal concluyen que en algunas regiones no es posible incrementar el ingreso de los campesinos, o es posible incrementarlo muy poco con los factores productivos que tienen a la mano. En otras si es posible, en la medida en que existen productores claramente líderes en el manejo de los factores productivos, cuya tecnología pudiera ser difundida. La necesidad de los campesinos de "adoptar nueva tecnología" o de "difundir la ya existente"(practicada por los líderes) para incrementar su ingreso depende de su habilidad para hacer frente a los desequilibrios que se presentan, para lo cual la educación es muy importante. Al final sugieren algunas recomendaciones de política agraria sobre la base de las conclusiones obtenidas.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandro Borda & Álvaro Quijandría, 1990. "La eficiencia de la economía campesina: concepto aplicable en el Perú," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 17(26), pages 3-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-26-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/download/305/307
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adolfo Figueroa, 1989. "La economía campesina de la sierra sur del Perú," Libros PUCP / PUCP Books, Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, edition 4, number lde-1989-02, December.
    2. Burley, Henry T, 1980. "Productive Efficiency in U.S. Manufacturing: A Linear Programming Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 62(4), pages 619-622, November.
    3. Grosskopf, S, 1986. "The Role of the Reference Technology in Measuring Productive Efficiency," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 96(382), pages 499-513, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soledad Moya & Jordi Perramon & Anselm Constans, 2005. "IFRS Adoption in Europe: The Case of Germany," Working Papers 0501, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Feb 2005.
    2. K. -L. Wang & Y. -T. Tseng & C. -C. Weng, 2003. "A study of production efficiencies of integrated securities firms in Taiwan," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 159-167.
    3. Martín-Bofarull, Mónica, 2000. "Technical Progress And Efficiency Change In Spanish Port System," ERSA conference papers ersa00p134, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 1998. "Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 49-61, January.
    5. R H Green & W D Cook, 2004. "A free coordination hull approach to efficiency measurement," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(10), pages 1059-1063, October.
    6. Dairo Estrada & Poldy Osorio, 2004. "Effects of Financial Capital on Colombian Banking Efficiency," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, vol. 22(47), pages 162-201, December.
    7. Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2018. "Econometric Analysis of Productivity: Theory and Implementation in R," Working Papers 18-008, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    8. Chang, Kuo-Ping, 1999. "Measuring efficiency with quasiconcave production frontiers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 497-506, June.
    9. Reardon, Thomas & Berdegue, Julio & Escobar, German, 2001. "Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Latin America: Overview and Policy Implications," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 395-409, March.
    10. W. Erwin Diewert & Kevin J. Fox, 2014. "Decomposing Bjurek Productivity Indexes into Explanatory Factors," Discussion Papers 2014-33, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    11. Hughes, Andrew & Yaisawarng, Suthathip, 2004. "Sensitivity and dimensionality tests of DEA efficiency scores," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 410-422, April.
    12. Xiangming Fang & Rodney Smith, 2008. "Barriers to Efficiency and the Privatisation of Township-Village Enterprises," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 409-424.
    13. Weibin Lin & Jin Yang & Bin Chen, 2011. "Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Integrated Energy and Environment Efficiency in China Based on a Green GDP Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Kumar, Surender & Managi, Shunsuke, 2012. "Productivity and convergence in India: A state-level analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 548-559.
    15. Runar Brännlund & Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf, 1995. "Environmental regulation and profitability: An application to Swedish pulp and paper mills," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(1), pages 23-36, July.
    16. Bruno De Borger & Kristiaan Kerstens & Diego Prior & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2013. "Static efficiency decompositions and capacity utilization: integrating economic and technical capacity notions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(24), pages 3529-3529, August.
    17. Henry Tulkens & Philippe Eeckaut, 2006. "Nonparametric Efficiency, Progress and Regress Measures For Panel Data: Methodological Aspects," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 395-429, Springer.
    18. Schejtman, Alexander & Berdegué, Julio A., 2006. "El Impacto Social de la Integración Regional en América Latina Rural," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2327, Inter-American Development Bank.
    19. Escobal, Javier, 2005. "The Role of Public Infraestructure in Market Development in Rural Peru," MPRA Paper 727, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J. & Reig-Martínez, Ernest, 2005. "Calculating shadow wages for family labour in agriculture : An analysis for Spanish citrus fruit farms," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 75.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-26-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiuppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.