IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v90y1976i4p575-589..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriate Technology, X-Inefficiency, and a Competitive Environment: Some Evidence from Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence J. White

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence J. White, 1976. "Appropriate Technology, X-Inefficiency, and a Competitive Environment: Some Evidence from Pakistan," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(4), pages 575-589.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:90:y:1976:i:4:p:575-589.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1885322
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parish, Ross M & Ng, Yew-Kwang, 1972. "Monopoly, X-Efficiency and the Measurement of Welfare Loss," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 39(155), pages 301-308, August.
    2. Schwartzman, David, 1973. "Competition and Efficiency: Comment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 756-764, May-June.
    3. Crew, M A & Rowley, C K, 1971. "On Allocative Efficiency, X-Efficiency and the Measurement of Welfare Loss," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 38(150), pages 199-203, May.
    4. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. & Srinivasan, T. N., 1973. "The general equilibrium theory of effective protection and resource allocation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 259-281, August.
    5. Ranis, Gustav, 1973. "Industrial Sector Labor Absorption," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(3), pages 387-408, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ha-Joon Chang & Ali Cheema & L. Mises, 2002. "Conditions For Successful Technology Policy In Developing Countries—Learning Rents, State Structures, And Institutions," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4-5), pages 369-398.
    2. Gans, Joshua S., 1998. "Industrialisation with a menu of technologies: Appropriate technologies and the 'big push'," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 333-348, September.
    3. Blomstrom, Magnus & Kokko, Ari, 1997. "How foreign investment affects host countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1745, The World Bank.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Formby & James Keeler & Paul Thistle, 1988. "X-efficiency, rent-seeking and social costs," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 115-126, May.
    2. Löschel, Andreas & Alexeeva-Talebi, Victoria & Mennel, Tim, 2008. "Climate Policy and the Problem of Competitiveness: Border Tax Adjustments or Integrated Emission Trading?," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Hassan, Rashid M., 1989. "A temporary general equilibrium model with endogenous money for economic policy analysis in Sudan," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010129, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. El Obeid, Amani E., 1994. "Measurement of the effective rate of protection for agricultural commodities in Sudan," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000017638, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. K. J. Blois, 1974. "Some Comments on the Theory of Inert Areas and the Definition of X-Efficiency," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 88(4), pages 681-686.
    6. Donald F. Vitaliano, 1997. "X-Inefficiency in the Public Sector: the Case of Libraries," Public Finance Review, , vol. 25(6), pages 629-643, November.
    7. Hazledine, Tim, 1980. "A Non-Neoclassical General Equilibrium Trade Model Implemented for Quebec," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 275159, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    8. Bo Chen & Hong Ma & David S. Jacks, 2017. "Revisiting the Effective Rate of Protection in the Late Stages of Chinese Industrialisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 424-438, February.
    9. Mordechal Kreinin & Elias Dinopoulos, 1995. "Protection of industry," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 179-196, April.
    10. Sorin BURNETE, 2017. "Outsourcing under Threat: Estimated Impact of Potential Tariffs on US Imports from Mexico," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 5(3), pages 88-97.
    11. Antimiani, Alessandro & Salvatici, Luca, 2005. "EU Trade Policies: Benchmarking Protection in a General Equilibrium Framework," Working Papers 18856, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    12. Peter Bogetoft & Jens Hougaard, 2003. "Rational Inefficiencies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 243-271, November.
    13. Kanika Pathania & Aditya Bhattacharjea, 2020. "Inverted Duty Structures and the Paradox of Negative Effective Protection in India, 2000–2014," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(2), pages 139-167, May.
    14. Merle Holden, 2001. "Effective Protection Revisited: How Useful A Policy Tool For South Africa?," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(4), pages 659-673, December.
    15. Avinash K. Dixit & Gene M. Grossman, 1982. "Trade and Protection with Multistage Production," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 49(4), pages 583-594.
    16. L. P. Mahe & J. Courgeon, 1986. "Distorsions de concurrence dues à la PAC. Protection effective sur le porc et l'aviculture en RFA, France, Pays-Bas, Danemark," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 173(1), pages 37-47.
    17. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1991. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Agricultural Policies: Documentation of the 30-Sector FPGE GAMS Model of the United States," Staff Reports 278539, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. David Greenaway & Chris Milner, 2003. "Effective Protection, Policy Appraisal and Trade Policy Reform," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 441-456, April.
    19. Joelle Latina & Roberta Piermartini & Michele Ruta, 2011. "Natural resources and non-cooperative trade policy," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 177-196, June.
    20. Tsitsiklis, John N. & Xu, Yunjian, 2014. "Efficiency loss in a Cournot oligopoly with convex market demand," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 46-58.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:90:y:1976:i:4:p:575-589.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.