This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Effective Protection, Policy Appraisal and Trade Policy Reform

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
David Greenaway (University of Nottingham)
Chris Milner (University of Nottingham)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

When the effective protection concept was first developed it was widely regarded as a key measure of the structure of protection and became widely deployed. It was however, subject to a theoretical critique on the grounds that it was essentially a partial equilibrium measure, which could not be easily embedded in a general equilibrium framework. Notwithstanding this critique, the concept has continued to be widely used, especially in the context of policy reform and policy appraisal in developing countries. This paper re-appraises the concept, reviews the extent of its application and discusses the factors behind its longevity as an investigative tool. The paper concludes that the measure still has a role to play in evaluating the structure of protection. Copyright © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2003.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=synergy&synergyAction=showTOC&journalCode=twec&volume=26&issue=4&year=2003&part=null
File Format: text/html
File Function: link to full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Blackwell Publishing in its journal The World Economy.

Volume (Year): 26 (2003)
Issue (Month): 4 (04)
Pages: 441-456
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:26:y:2003:i:4:p:441-456

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920

Order Information:
Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0378-5920

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Kate Flowers & Malcolm Bosworth, 2002. "WTO Market Access Negotiations for Non-Agricultural Products, Doha Round: Implications for East Asia," Trade Working Papers 394, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  2. Sven W. Arndt, 2004. "Trade Diversion and Production Sharing," Working Papers 0401, Lowe Institute of Political Economy. [Downloadable!]
  3. Prema-chandra Athukorala, 2005. "Trade Policy Reforms and the Structure of Protection in Vietnam," Departmental Working Papers 2005-06, Australian National University, Economics RSPAS. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All RePEc services are meant to be be free forever, as they are all run by volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.