IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v18y1991i1p32-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positivism and Paradigm Dominance in Consumer Research: Toward Critical Pluralism and Rapproachement

Author

Listed:
  • Hunt, Shelby D

Abstract

As spirited debate continues on the appropriate philosophical and methodological foundations for consumer research, participants claim the literature has been full of misconceptions, misunderstandings, misrepresentations, and mischaracterizations. Through historical methodology, this article shows that these "misses" stem, at least in part, from the debate's having been historically ill informed about the origins and fundamental beliefs of a group of philosophers called logical positivists. After addressing a fundamental premise of the entire debate (i.e., that contemporary social science and consumer research are dominated by positivism), this article advocates critical pluralism and documents a favorable prognosis for rapprochement. Copyright 1991 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunt, Shelby D, 1991. "Positivism and Paradigm Dominance in Consumer Research: Toward Critical Pluralism and Rapproachement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 32-44, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:18:y:1991:i:1:p:32-44
    DOI: 10.1086/209238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209238
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/209238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Breno Giovanni Adaid Castro & Claudio Vaz Torres & Thiago Gomes Nascimento & Gisela Demo, 2015. "Are Men More Rational than Women when Purchasing Cars?: A Comparison of Cultural Influences on Product Judgment in Brazil and the United States of America," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(6), pages 72-99, November.
    2. Ramirez, Edward & David, Meredith E. & Brusco, Michael J., 2013. "Marketing's SEM based nomological network: Constructs and research streams in 1987–1997 and in 1998–2008," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1255-1260.
    3. Shaw, Michael & Nowicki, Andrew, 2018. "Zebra crossings," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 310-314.
    4. Izhak Berkovich, 2018. "Beyond qualitative/quantitative structuralism: the positivist qualitative research and the paradigmatic disclaimer," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2063-2077, September.
    5. Marc Burger, 2008. "Towards a framework for the elicitation of dilemmas," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 541-562, August.
    6. John F. Gaski, 2015. "The trouble with marketing ethics . . ," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 6, pages 111-124, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. John G. Wacker & Danny Samson, 2021. "Beyond supply chain management: jointly optimising operations/ supply and the marketing mix," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 451-466, December.
    8. Easton, Geoff, 2002. "Marketing: a critical realist approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 103-109, February.
    9. Leigh McAlister & Frank Germann & Natalie Chisam & Pete Hayes & Adriana Lynch & Bill Stewart, 2023. "A taxonomy of marketing organizations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 617-635, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:18:y:1991:i:1:p:32-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.