IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v84y2002i3p774-781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Global Impacts of Farm Policy Reforms in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Mary E. Burfisher
  • Sherman Robinson
  • Karen Thierfelder

Abstract

Multilateral negotiations on agricultural trade liberalization will require World Trade Organization (WTO) members, including Organization for Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, to improve market access and to reduce domestic support and export subsidies. In this paper, we analyze the effects of agricultural policy reform by three OECD members who are major economies in world agricultural trade–the United States, the European Union (EU), and Japan. We use a multi-country computable general equilibrium (CGE) model with detailed treatment of the agricultural trade and domestic policies in OECD countries. Our framework takes into account the differences in production impacts among traditional, commodity-linked production subsidies and other types of domestic subsidies that recently have become more important in countries’ farm support programs. We capture the operational features of farm support programs, allowing some domestic subsidies to insulate producers from market price changes while treating other payments as fixed, lump sum subsidies. When domestic policies insulate producers from market price signals, they dampen production responses to market access reforms in the domestic economy and to reforms in both partner countries. We find that this linkage leads to dramatic reductions in a country’s farm program costs when another country eliminates its support unilaterally. Given the links among domestic support programs in OECD countries, we also find that multilateral reform leads to smaller output adjustments than unilateral reform. In the next section, we describe agricultural trade and domestic policies in the three countries, differentiating them by their treatment or “color” under the global trade rules of the WTO. Next, we describe how crop-linked subsidies and other types of domestic support policies can affect production. We then simulate agricultural policy reforms by the three countries, and discuss the effects on their agricultural productio
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Mary E. Burfisher & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2002. "The Global Impacts of Farm Policy Reforms in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(3), pages 774-781.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:84:y:2002:i:3:p:774-781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-8276.00336
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bergman, Lars, 1990. "Energy and environmental constraints on growth: A CGE modeling approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 671-691.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elhanan Helpman, 2014. "Foreign Trade and Investment: Firm-level Perspectives," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(321), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Claire Economidou & Antu Panini Murshid, 2008. "Testing the Linkages between Trade and Productivity Growth," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(4), pages 845-860, November.
    3. Diao, Xinshen & Yanoma, Yukitsugu, 2003. "Exploring regional dynamics in Sub-Saharan African agriculture," DSGD discussion papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Gregory S. Miller, 2006. "The Press as a Watchdog for Accounting Fraud," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1001-1033, December.
    5. Lorusso, Marco & Pieroni, Luca, 2018. "Causes and consequences of oil price shocks on the UK economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 223-236.
    6. Rudra P. Pradhan & Mak B. Arvin & Sahar Bahmani & Sara E. Bennett, 2017. "Broadband penetration, financial development, and economic growth nexus: evidence from the Arab League countries," Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 151-171, May.
    7. Sergio Mariotti & Lucia Piscitello & Stefano Elia, 2014. "Local Externalities and Ownership Choices in Foreign Acquisitions by Multinational Enterprises," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(2), pages 187-211, April.
    8. International Monetary Fund, 2016. "Tunisia: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2016/047, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Mullen, Kathleen & Sun, Dongsheng & Thomas, Marcelle & Orden, David & Gulati, Ashok, 2004. "Agricultural Policy Interventions In Developing Countries: Mapping The Nature, Degree And Progress Of Reforms," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20081, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. García Merchán, Gabriela, 2023. "Agricultural Subsidies in the Economy of Ecuador – An Assessment of Impact Through CGE Modelling," Papers 1413, World Trade Institute.
    11. Gadir G. Asgarzade, 2017. "Tax Competition in Switzerland," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 3(4), pages 62-67, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lecca, Patrizio & Swales, Kim & Turner, Karen, 2011. "An investigation of issues relating to where energy should enter the production function," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2832-2841.
    2. Hodjat Ghadimi, 2008. "Energy in a Resource-based Regional Economy: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers Working Paper 2008-02, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    3. Turner, Karen, 2009. "Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 648-666, September.
    4. repec:rri:wpaper:200705 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Conrad, Klaus, 1999. "An econometric model of production with endogenous improvement in energy efficiency, 1970-1995," Discussion Papers 563, Institut fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Abteilung fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Grant Allan & Peter McGregor & Kim Swales & Karen Turner, 2007. "The UK Climate Change Levy and the Potential for Double-Dividend Effects under Different Labour Market Specifications: a Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for the United Kingdom," Energy and Environmental Modeling 2007 24000001, EcoMod.
    7. Karen Turner, 2008. "A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of the Relative Price Sensitivity Required to Induce Rebound Effects in Response to an Improvement in Energy Efficiency in the UK Economy," Working Papers 0807, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    8. Loschel, Andreas, 2002. "Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 105-126, December.
    9. Benjasak, Chonlakan & Bhattarai, Keshab, 2017. "General Equilibrium Impacts VAT and Corporate Tax in Thailand," MPRA Paper 88816, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jul 2018.
    10. Turner, Karen & Munday, Max & McGregor, Peter & Swales, Kim, 2012. "How responsible is a region for its carbon emissions? An empirical general equilibrium analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 70-78.
    11. Xie, Jian & Saltzman, Sidney, 2000. "Environmental Policy Analysis: An Environmental Computable General-Equilibrium Approach for Developing Countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 453-489, July.
    12. Yang, Hao-Yen, 2001. "Carbon emissions control and trade liberalization: coordinated approaches to Taiwan's trade and tax policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 725-734, July.
    13. N. Satyanarayana Murthy & Manoj K. Panda & Kirit S. Parikh, 2006. "CO2 Emissions reduction strategies and economic development of India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2006-004, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    14. Erno Zalai, 1998. "Computable Equilibrium Modelling and Application to Economies in Transition," CERT Discussion Papers 9804, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    15. Turner, Karen & Hanley, Nick, 2011. "Energy efficiency, rebound effects and the environmental Kuznets Curve," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 709-720, September.
    16. Herbert Wibert & Victor Hasudungana & Sulthon Sjahril Sabaruddinb, 2020. "Incentive-based policy to promote the production of geothermal power from carbon tax scheme: A case of Indonesian CGE model," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 105-127.
    17. Allan, Grant & Hanley, Nick & McGregor, Peter & Swales, Kim & Turner, Karen, 2007. "The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 779-798, July.
    18. N. Satyanarayana Murthy & Manoj Panda & Kirit Parikh, 2007. "CO2 Emission Reduction Strategies and Economic Development of India," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 1(1), pages 85-118, March.
    19. Janine De Fence & Nick Hanley & Karen Turner, 2009. "Do Productivity Improvements Move Us Along the Environmental Kuznets Curve?," Working Papers 0908, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    20. Resosudarmo, Budy P. & Thorbecke, Erik, 1996. "The impact of environmental policies on household incomes for different socio-economic classes: The case of air pollutants in Indonesia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 83-94, May.
    21. Linda Ferguson & Peter Mcgregor & J. Kim Swales & Karen Turner & Ya Ping Yin, 2005. "Incorporating sustainability indicators into a computable general equilibrium model of the scottish economy," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 103-140.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:84:y:2002:i:3:p:774-781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.