IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbfs/y2020i39b2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Austrian banks’ lending risk appetite in times of expansive monetary policy and tightening capital regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Kerbl

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank, On-Site Banking Inspections Division – Large Banks)

  • Katharina Steiner

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Foreign Research Division)

Abstract

In the past decade, the Austrian credit market was shaped by expansive monetary policy, favorable economic conditions and tightening regulatory capital requirements. Analyzing the impact of these three factors on Austrian banks’ credit risk, we focus on credit risk of new nonfinancial corporate borrowers and banks’ willingness to fund customers with a high risk of default. To this end, we examine borrower-by-borrower data available in the Austrian credit register. Using data from 2008 to 2019, we find evidence for a strong improvement in credit quality as estimated by banks. We relate this overall credit quality improvement to the favorable economic environment as corporate financial statements did not improve in tandem. Applying fixed effects panel regressions, we find that expansive monetary policy induces risk taking. Banks subject to tightening capital requirements reduced the probability of default and expected loss of their customers more strongly. Smaller, regional deposit-financed banks, which are to a greater extent affected by decreasing interest rates due to margin pressure, show stronger signs of risk taking. COVID-19 update: Austrian banks’ credit quality will severely worsen as a result of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and the related economic shutdown. Past crises showed that economies and financial stability are hit the more, the higher the levels of private sector debt and the worse the credit quality are. In our analysis, we find that the credit quality of banks’ loan portfolios was good according to their own estimates when banks entered the coronavirus crisis. Low estimates of credit risk, however, also imply lower risk-weighted assets and thus lower capital requirements for a given loan portfolio. In annex 2, we depict the development of credit quality until year-end 2019 in selected service industries which were immediately hit by the policy measures taken in Austria to contain the pandemic. The overall trend, evident in recent years, toward improved credit quality according to banks’ estimates holds for all those – albeit heterogenous – industries, even though credit risk parameters are worse than for the cross-industry average, especially for accommodation, food and beverage service activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Kerbl & Katharina Steiner, 2020. "Austrian banks’ lending risk appetite in times of expansive monetary policy and tightening capital regulation," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 39, pages 89-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfs:y:2020:i:39:b:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:cf908798-4e1f-4a95-a5b7-d62b95b188c3/10_Austrian_banks_lending_risk_appetite_in_times.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordà, Òscar & Schularick, Moritz & Taylor, Alan M., 2015. "Betting the house," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(S1), pages 2-18.
    2. Leonardo Gambacorta, 2009. "Monetary policy and the risk-taking channel," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December.
    3. De-Ramon, sebastian & Straughan, Michael, 2017. "The economic cost of capital: a VECM approach for estimating and testing the banking sector's response to changes in capital ratios," Bank of England working papers 663, Bank of England.
    4. Angela Maddaloni & Jose-Luis Peydro, 2011. "Bank Risk-taking, Securitization, Supervision, and Low Interest Rates: Evidence from the Euro-area and the U.S. Lending Standards," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(6), pages 2121-2165.
    5. Markus Behn & Rainer Haselmann & Vikrant Vig, 2022. "The Limits of Model‐Based Regulation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(3), pages 1635-1684, June.
    6. Gauti B. Eggertsson & Ragnar E. Juelsrud & Lawrence H. Summers & Ella Getz Wold, 2019. "Negative Nominal Interest Rates and the Bank Lending Channel," NBER Working Papers 25416, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Storz, Manuela & Koetter, Michael & Setzer, Ralph & Westphal, Andreas, 2017. "Do we want these two to tango? On zombie firms and stressed banks in Europe," IWH Discussion Papers 13/2017, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    8. Giovanni Dell'Ariccia & Luc Laeven & Gustavo A. Suarez, 2017. "Bank Leverage and Monetary Policy's Risk-Taking Channel: Evidence from the United States," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(2), pages 613-654, April.
    9. Cappelletti, Giuseppe & Ponte Marques, Aurea & Varraso, Paolo & Budrys, Žymantas & Peeters, Jonas, 2019. "Impact of higher capital buffers on banks’ lending and risk-taking: evidence from the euro area experiments," Working Paper Series 2292, European Central Bank.
    10. Judith Eidenberger & Stefan W. Schmitz & Katharina Steiner, 2014. "The Priorities of Deleveraging in the Euro Area and Austria and Its Implications for CE SEE," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 27, pages 50-63.
    11. Margherita Bottero & Ms. Camelia Minoiu & José-Luis Peydró & Andrea Polo & Mr. Andrea F Presbitero & Enrico Sette, 2019. "Negative Monetary Policy Rates and Portfolio Rebalancing: Evidence from Credit Register Data," IMF Working Papers 2019/044, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Stefan Kerbl & Michael Sigmund, 2016. "From low to negative rates: an asymmetric dilemma," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 32, pages 120-137.
    13. Cadamagnani, Fabrizio & Harimohan, Rashmi & Tangri, Kumar, 2015. "A bank within a bank: how a commercial bank’s treasury function affects the interest rates set for loans and deposits," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 55(2), pages 153-164.
    14. Dan Andrews & Filippos Petroulakis, 2017. "Breaking the Shackles: Zombie Firms, Weak Banks and Depressed Restructuring in Europe," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1433, OECD Publishing.
    15. Beverly Hirtle & Anna Kovner & Matthew Plosser, 2020. "The Impact of Supervision on Bank Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(5), pages 2765-2808, October.
    16. Stefan Kerbl & Boris Simunovic & Andreas Wolf, 2019. "Quantifying interest rate risk and the effect of model assumptions behind sight deposits," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 37, pages 73-85.
    17. Moritz Schularick & Alan M. Taylor, 2012. "Credit Booms Gone Bust: Monetary Policy, Leverage Cycles, and Financial Crises, 1870-2008," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 1029-1061, April.
    18. Borio, Claudio & Zhu, Haibin, 2012. "Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: A missing link in the transmission mechanism?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 236-251.
    19. Jean Arcand & Enrico Berkes & Ugo Panizza, 2015. "Too much finance?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 105-148, June.
    20. Ryan Niladri Banerjee & Boris Hofmann, 2018. "The rise of zombie firms: causes and consequences," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Whelsy Boungou, 2019. "Negative Interest Rates, Bank Profitability and Risk-taking," Working Papers hal-03456106, HAL.
    2. Bongiovanni, Alessio & Reghezza, Alessio & Santamaria, Riccardo & Williams, Jonathan, 2021. "Do negative interest rates affect bank risk-taking?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 350-364.
    3. Huang, Yiping & Li, Xiang & Wang, Chu, 2021. "What does peer-to-peer lending evidence say about the Risk-Taking Channel of monetary policy?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Huang, Yiping & Li, Xiang & Wang, Chu, 2021. "What does peer-to-peer lending evidence say about the Risk-Taking Channel of monetary policy?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Simona Malovana & Josef Bajzik & Dominika Ehrenbergerova & Jan Janku, 2020. "A Prolonged Period of Low Interest Rates: Unintended Consequences," Research and Policy Notes 2020/02, Czech National Bank.
    6. repec:zbw:bofitp:2019_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Joscha Beckmann & Klaus-Jürgen Gern & Nils Jannsen, 2022. "Should they stay or should they go? Negative interest rate policies under review," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 885-912, October.
    8. Bubeck, Johannes & Maddaloni, Angela & Peydró, José-Luis, 2020. "Negative Monetary Policy Rates and Systemic Banks' Risk‐Taking: Evidence from the Euro Area Securities Register," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(S1), pages 197-231.
    9. Tomasz Chmielewski & Tomasz Lyziak & Ewa Stanislawska, 2020. "Risk-Taking Channel and Its Non-Linearities: The Case of an Emerging Market Economy," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 70(1), pages 2-25, February.
    10. David Martinez-Miera & Rafael Repullo, 2019. "Monetary Policy, Macroprudential Policy, and Financial Stability," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 809-832, August.
    11. Stijn Claessens & M Ayhan Kose, 2018. "Frontiers of macrofinancial linkages," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 95.
    12. Elliott, David & Meisenzah, Ralf R & Peydró, José-Luis, 2023. "Nonbank lenders as global shock absorbers: evidence from US monetary policy spillovers," Bank of England working papers 1012, Bank of England.
    13. Koenig, Philipp J. & Schliephake, Eva, 2021. "Bank risk-taking and impaired monetarypolicy transmission," Discussion Papers 42/2021, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    14. Altavilla, Carlo & Laeven, Luc & Peydró, José-Luis, 2020. "Monetary and Macroprudential Policy Complementarities: evidence from European credit registers," CEPR Discussion Papers 15539, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Claudio Borio & Piti Disyatat & Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul, 2018. "What Anchors for the Natural Rate of Interest?," PIER Discussion Papers 98, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Dong, Yan & Wang, Cong, 2021. "The effect of stimulus policy on lending behavior and bank risk: Evidence from the Chinese banking sector," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. Bottero, Margherita & Minoiu, Camelia & Peydró, José-Luis & Polo, Andrea & Presbitero, Andrea F. & Sette, Enrico, 2022. "Expansionary yet different: Credit supply and real effects of negative interest rate policy," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 754-778.
    18. Brana, Sophie & Campmas, Alexandra & Lapteacru, Ion, 2019. "(Un)Conventional monetary policy and bank risk-taking: A nonlinear relationship," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 576-593.
    19. Agur, Itai & Demertzis, Maria, 2019. "Will macroprudential policy counteract monetary policy’s effects on financial stability?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 65-75.
    20. Colletaz, Gilbert & Levieuge, Grégory & Popescu, Alexandra, 2018. "Monetary policy and long-run systemic risk-taking," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 165-184.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bank lending; credit quality; low interest environment; capital requirements; financial stability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfs:y:2020:i:39:b:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan W. Schmitz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.