IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mic/esfjrn/v10y2013i1p116-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A barnamezős beruházások szociokulturális háttere és jelentősége Észak-Amerikában

Author

Listed:
  • Gábor Biczó

    (University of Miskolc)

Abstract

A tanulmány a barnamezős területek rehabilitációjának és revitalizációjának Észak–Amerikában kidolgozott elméleti, módszertani és gyakorlati kérdéseivel foglalkozik. Az elemzés hangsúlyosan tárgyalja a barnamezős fejlesztésekben a szociokulturális feltételrendszer jelentőségének felismeréséhez vezető folyamatot, az interdiszciplináris közösségi szemléletű projektmunka sajátosságait.

Suggested Citation

  • Gábor Biczó, 2013. "A barnamezős beruházások szociokulturális háttere és jelentősége Észak-Amerikában," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 116-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:mic:esfjrn:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:116-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strategiaifuzetek.hu/files/64/EMSF_2013_1_vegem.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alchian, Armen A & Demsetz, Harold, 1972. "Production , Information Costs, and Economic Organization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(5), pages 777-795, December.
    2. Dominic Power & Atle Hauge, 2008. "No Man's Brand—Brands, Institutions, and Fashion," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 123-143, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ágnes Hegyi-Kéri, 2013. "Barnamezős fejlesztések költség-haszon vizsgálata," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 72-86.
    2. Beáta Siskáné Szilasi & Lajos Szalontai & János Vágó, 2013. "Észak-Magyarország felhagyott bányászati területeinek hasznosítási lehetőségei," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 26-36.
    3. Klára Tóthné Szita & Judit Roncz, 2013. "A barnamezős területek újrahasznosításának megítélése metaanalízis alapján, különös tekintettel az Észak-magyarországi régióra," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 14-25.
    4. Kinga Fekszi, 2013. "„A tovatűnő ipar nyomában Miskolcon.” Adalékok a barnamezős területek munkaerőpiaci problémájának feltárásához," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 57-62.
    5. Júlia A. Nagy, 2013. "The role of city promotion in the regeneration of Manchester," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 94-115.
    6. Gábor Lux, 2013. "Az újraiparosítás lehetőségei: Fejlesztési együttműködés a periférián," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 4-13.
    7. Lilla Bánhalmi & Gábor Biczó, 2013. "A barnamezős rehabilitáció és az örökség turizmus kapcsolata: nemzetközi tapasztalatok és a Digép esete," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 63-71.
    8. Zsuzsanna Dabasi Halász, 2013. "Vállalkozói siker és a társadalmi tőke," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 49-56.
    9. Judit Dobák, 2013. "A diósgyőri kohászat barnamezős területének fejlesztési lehetőségei," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 10(1), pages 37-48.
    10. Tomas J. Philipson & Seth A. Seabury & Lee M. Lockwood & Dana P. Goldman & Darius N. Lakdawalla, 2010. "Geographic Variation in Health Care: The Role of Private Markets," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 41(1 (Spring), pages 325-361.
    11. Baarda, James R., 2003. "Current Law & Economics Debates: Tools for Assessing Fundamental Cooperative Changes?," 2003 Annual Meeting, October 29 31802, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    12. Ugo Pagano, 2010. "Marrying in the Cathedral: A Framework for the Analysis of Corporate Governance," Chapters, in: Alessio M. Pacces (ed.), The Law and Economics of Corporate Governance, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    14. David J. Cooper & Krista Saral & Marie Claire Villeval, 2021. "Why Join a Team?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6980-6997, November.
    15. Peter-J. Jost, 2023. "Auditing versus monitoring and the role of commitment," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 463-496, June.
    16. José Castro Caldas & Helder Coelho, 1999. "The Origin of Institutions: Socio-Economic Processes, Choice, Norms and Conventions," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 2(2), pages 1-1.
    17. Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta, 2010. "Editors’ Introduction," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2012. "The Shareholder–Manager Relationship and Its Impact on the Likelihood of Firm Bribery," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 495-507, July.
    19. Chenini Hajer & Jarboui Anis, 2018. "Analysis of the Impact of Governance on Bank Performance: Case of Commercial Tunisian Banks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 871-895, September.
    20. Foss Kirsten & Foss Nicolai & Klein Peter G. & Klein Sandra K., 2002. "Heterogeneous Capital, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Organization," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    barnamező; alkalmazott antropológia; közösség-központú fejlesztés; lokális közösség;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • L78 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mic:esfjrn:v:10:y:2013:i:1:p:116-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vgtmihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.