IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mhr/jinste/urnsici0932-4569(200003)1561_216uucfie_2.0.tx_2-q.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Underdevelopment: Challenges for Institutional Economics from the Point of View of Poor Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Pranab K. Bardhan

Abstract

In this paper we focus on a few broad analytical themes that have not been paid enough attention in the theoretical institutional economics literature: in particular, (a) the process of persistence of dysfunctional institutions in poor countries, (b) institutional impediments as strategic outcomes of distributive conflicts, (c) the collective action problems these conflicts exacerbate, and (d) in view of the critical need for coordination, a more complex and nuanced role of the state, which many (though not all) states fail to perform.

Suggested Citation

  • Pranab K. Bardhan, 2000. "Understanding Underdevelopment: Challenges for Institutional Economics from the Point of View of Poor Countries," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 156(1), pages 216-216, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(200003)156:1_216:uucfie_2.0.tx_2-q
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gagliardi, Francesca, 2008. "Institutions and economic change: A critical survey of the new institutional approaches and empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 416-443, February.
    2. Deininger, Klaus & Mpuga, Paul, 2004. "Does greater accountability improve the quality of delivery of public services? Evidence from Uganda," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3277, The World Bank.
    3. Bastiaensen, Johan & De Herdt, Tom & Vaessen, Jos, 2002. "Poverty, institutions and interventions: a framework for an institutional analysis of poverty and local anti-poverty interventions," IOB Discussion Papers 2002.06, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    4. Duarte N. Leite & Sandra T. Silva & Oscar Afonso, 2014. "Institutions, Economics And The Development Quest," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 491-515, July.
    5. Wanjala, Bernadette, 2016. "Can the big push approach end rural poverty in Africa? : Insights from Sauri millennium village in Kenya," Other publications TiSEM 5a686b22-6749-4e9e-8bf4-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Zou, Liping & Tang, Tiantian & Li, Xiaoming, 2016. "The stock preferences of domestic versus foreign investors: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (QFIIs) in China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 37, pages 12-28.
    7. Deininger, Klaus & Mpuga, Paul, 2005. "Does Greater Accountability Improve the Quality of Public Service Delivery? Evidence from Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 171-191, January.
    8. Tom De Herdt, 2003. "Cooperation and fairness: the flood-Dresher experiment revisited," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 183-210.
    9. Jeffrey B. Nugent & Shailender Swaminathan, 2005. "Voluntary Contributions to Informal Activities Producing Public Goods: Can These be Induced by Government and Other Formal Sector Agents?: Some Evidence from Indonesian Posyandus," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2005-19, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Ravi Shankar & Leslie Chadwick & Shahzad Ghafoor & Farooq Khan, 2011. "Development of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(3), pages 87-101, July.
    11. Elizabeth M Moore & Luis Alfonso Dau & Santiago Mingo, 2021. "The effects of trade integration on formal and informal entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic development," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(4), pages 746-772, June.
    12. Michael Frenkel & Lukas Menkhoff, 2004. "Are Foreign Institutional Investors Good for Emerging Markets?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1275-1293, August.
    13. Edo Andriesse, 2009. "Balancing private sector development and local-central relations," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 16(1), pages 93-114, June.
    14. Bharatee Bhusana Dash, 2014. "Regional Income Disparity and Government Intervention in India," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 15(2), pages 281-314, September.
    15. Joan Oriol Prats, 2007. "Revisión crítica de los aportes del institucionalismo a la teoría y la práctica del desarrollo," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 9(16), pages 121-148, January-J.
    16. Bastiaensen, Johan & Herdt, Tom De & D'Exelle, Ben, 2005. "Poverty reduction as a local institutional process," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 979-993, June.
    17. Selly Amal-Kerim & Hélène Rey-Valette & Francoise Seyte & Dorothé Boccanfuso, 2015. "A subjective view of governance indicators," Working Papers 15-10, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Oct 2015.
    18. R. Greg Bell & Curt B. Moore & Hussam A. Al–Shammari, 2008. "Country of Origin and Foreign IPO Legitimacy: Understanding the Role of Geographic Scope and Insider Ownership," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(1), pages 185-202, January.
    19. Raja, A.V & Rathinam, Francis, 2005. "Economic Efficiency of Public Interest Litigations (PIL): Lessons from India," MPRA Paper 3870, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(200003)156:1_216:uucfie_2.0.tx_2-q. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Wolpert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/jite .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.