IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vállalatközi tulajdonosi hálózatok a kelet-európai kapitalizmusban
[Inter-enterprise ownership networks in the East European capitalism]

Author

Listed:
  • Bruszt, László
  • Stark, David

Abstract

A neoliberális felfogás hívei azt feltételezik, hogy a posztszocialista átalakulás során a piacok önépítő módon működnek. Az állampárti nézetek új képviselői viszont az államtól várják a piacgazdaság kiformálását. A szerzők szerint e dichotómia megha- ladható, mert az állam mellett más nem piaci intézmények is elősegíthetik a piaci orientáció megerősödését. Támaszkodni lehetne a mikrogazdasági szereplők kap- csolati hálózataira is, amelyek Magyarországon is kialakultak már az előző rendszer- ben. Ezek a kapcsolatok vállalati kereszttulajdonosi hálózatokká fejlődtek a piacgaz- dasági átmenet első éveiben. A kormányzat azonban nem számolt e hálózatokkal privatizációs és regulációs politikája kialakítása során. A fellépő következmények sorozatos bank- és adóskonszolidációra kényszerítették, amely a paternalizmus új formájának számít. Csehországban ezzel szemben tudatában voltak a kötelezettsé- gek hálózati jellegének, ezért mindeddig aktív csődellenes politikát folytattak. Az utal- ványos privatizáció azonban ott sem népi kapitalizmust teremtett: a létrejött cseh intézményi kereszttulajdonosi hálózatok központi elemévé mezoszintű szereplők (a beruházási alapok) váltak.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruszt, László & Stark, David, 1996. "Vállalatközi tulajdonosi hálózatok a kelet-európai kapitalizmusban [Inter-enterprise ownership networks in the East European capitalism]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 183-203.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=84
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Granovetter, Mark, 1995. "Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern Economy," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 4(1), pages 93-130.
    2. Kornai, Janos, 1992. "The Postsocialist Transition and the State: Reflections in the Light of Hungarian Fiscal Problems," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Karla Brom & Mitchell Orenstein, 1994. "The privatised sector in the Czech republic: Government and bank control in a transitional economy," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 893-928.
    4. Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos, 1995. "Latin Amerika az "állam válsága" megközelítés fényében [The crisis of the state approach to Latin America]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 533-551.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vedres, Balázs, 2000. "A tulajdonosi hálózatok felbomlása. A rekombináns tulajdonformák szerepe és a hazai nagyvállalatok tulajdonszerkezetének jellemzői a kilencvenes évek végén [The break-up of the ownership networks. ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 680-699.
    2. Stark, David & Gernot Grabher, -, 1996. "A szervezett sokféleség evolúcióelmélet, hálózatelemzés és a posztszocialista átalakulás [Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analisys, and postsocialist transformation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 745-769.
    3. Tóth, István János, 1998. "Vállalkozások tulajdonosi kapcsolatai Magyarországon 19921996 között [Ownership relations of enterprises in Hungary between 19921996]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 591-615.
    4. Kovách, Imre & Csite, András, 1999. "A posztszocialimus vége. A magyarországi nagyvállalatok tulajdonosi szerkezete és hatékonysága 1997-ben [The end of post-socialism. The ownership structure and efficiency of big Hungarian firms in ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 121-144.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang-Yang Lee & Ji-Hwan Lee & Ajai S. Gaur, 2017. "Are large business groups conducive to industry innovation? The moderating role of technological appropriability," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 313-337, June.
    2. N. N., 2019. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 12/2019," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 92(12), December.
    3. Shao, Yan & Sun, Lingxia, 2021. "Entrepreneurs’ social capital and venture capital financing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 499-512.
    4. Ian Carrillo & David Pellow, 2021. "Critical environmental justice and the nature of the firm," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 815-826, September.
    5. Pursey Heugens & Stelios Zyglidopoulos, 2008. "From social ties to embedded competencies: the case of business groups," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(4), pages 325-341, November.
    6. repec:ilo:ilowps:298738 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Sheaff, Rod & Benson, Lawrence & Farbus, Lou & Schofield, Jill & Mannion, Russell & Reeves, David, 2010. "Network resilience in the face of health system reform," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 779-786, March.
    8. Schmieding, Holger & Buch, Claudia, 1992. "Better banks for Eastern Europe," Kiel Discussion Papers 197, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. David Uhlir, 1998. "Internationalization, and Institutional and Regional Change: Restructuring Post-communist Networks in the Region of Lan w kroun, Czech Republic," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 673-685.
    10. Klaus Friesenbichler & Michael Peneder, 2016. "Innovation, competition and productivity," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 24(3), pages 535-580, July.
    11. Mattias Smångs, 2008. "Business Groups in 20th‐Century Swedish Political Economy: A Sociological Perspective," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(5), pages 889-913, November.
    12. Randall Morck, 2011. "Finance and Governance in Developing Economies," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 375-406, December.
    13. Popli, Manish & Ladkani, Radha M. & Gaur, Ajai S., 2017. "Business group affiliation and post-acquisition performance: An extended resource-based view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-30.
    14. Özlem Yýldýrým-Öktem, 2010. "Generational Differences In Involvement Of Family Members In Governance And Management Of Turkish Family Business Groups And Background Characteristics Of Family Members," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 41-66.
    15. Michael H. Böheim & Klaus S. Friesenbichler, 2016. "Exporting the Competition Policy Regime of the European Union: Success or Failure? Empirical Evidence for Acceding Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 569-582, May.
    16. Heejung Byun & Tae-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Identity Claims and Diffusion of Sustainability Report: Evidence from Korean Listed Companies, 2003–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 551-565, February.
    17. Kim, Euysung, 2006. "The impact of family ownership and capital structures on productivity performance of Korean manufacturing firms: Corporate governance and the "chaebol problem"," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 209-233, June.
    18. B. Yurtoglu, 2000. "Ownership, Control and Performance of Turkish Listed Firms," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 27(2), pages 193-222, June.
    19. Kuo-Pin Yang & Gavin M. Schwarz, 2016. "A Multilevel Analysis of the Performance Implications of Excess Control in Business Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1219-1236, October.
    20. Eduardsen, Jonas & Marinova, Svetla Trifonova & González-Loureiro, Miguel & Vlačić, Božidar, 2022. "Business group affiliation and SMEs’ international sales intensity and diversification: A multi-country study," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    21. Surajit Mazumdar, 2023. "The Multi-entity Structure and Control in Business Groups," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Achin Chakraborty & Indrani Chakraborty (ed.), Indian Business Groups and Other Corporations, chapter 0, pages 111-128, Springer.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights
    • P31 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.