This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Reconciling support theory and the book-making principle Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Enrico Diecidue ()
Dolchai La-ornual
No abstract is available for
this item.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by Springer in its journal Journal of Risk and Uncertainty .
Volume (Year): 38 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 (June)
Pages: 173-190
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:38:y:2009:i:3:p:173-190Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=100299
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Book-making principle ; Support theory ; Nonexpected utility ; D81 ; References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 1993.
" Testing for Juxtaposition and Event-Splitting Effects ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 235-54, June.
Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989.
"Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior ,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992.
" Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
Ghirardato, Paolo & Klibanoff, Peter & Marinacci, Massimo, 1998.
"Additivity with multiple priors ,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 405-420, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Nau, Robert F, 1995.
"Coherent Decision Analysis with Inseparable Probabilities and Utilities ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 71-91, January.
Fox, Craig R & Rogers, Brett A & Tversky, Amos, 1996.
"Options Traders Exhibit Subadditive Decision Weights ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 5-17, July.
Schmeidler, David, 1989.
"Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity ,"
Econometrica ,
Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 571-87, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Quiggin, John, 1982.
"A theory of anticipated utility ,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization ,
Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 323-343, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos, 1979.
"Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk ,"
Econometrica ,
Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 263-91, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Idson, Lorraine Chen, et al, 2001.
" The Relation between Probability and Evidence Judgment: An Extension of Support Theory ,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,
Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 227-49, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? IDEAS also indexes software components .
This page was last updated on 2009-12-31.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .