IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v189y2024i2d10.1007_s10551-023-05355-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Don’t Shoot the Messenger? A Morality- and Gender-Based Model of Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Kakarika

    (Durham University Business School)

  • Shiva Taghavi

    (NEOMA Business School)

  • Helena V. González-Gómez

    (NEOMA Business School)

Abstract

We conducted three studies to examine how the recipients of negative workplace gossip judge the gossip sender’s morality and how they respond behaviorally. Study 1 provided experimental evidence that gossip recipients perceive senders as low in morality, with female recipients rating the sender’s morality more negatively than male recipients. In a follow-up experiment (Study 2), we further found that perceived low morality translates into behavioral responses in the form of career-related sanctions by the recipient on the gossip sender. A critical incident study (Study 3) enhanced the external validity and extended the moderated mediation model by showing that gossip recipients also penalize senders with social exclusion. We discuss the implications for practice and research on negative workplace gossip, gender differences in attributions of morality, and gossip recipients’ behavioral responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Kakarika & Shiva Taghavi & Helena V. González-Gómez, 2024. "Don’t Shoot the Messenger? A Morality- and Gender-Based Model of Reactions to Negative Workplace Gossip," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 329-344, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:189:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05355-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05355-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-023-05355-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-023-05355-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimmo Eriksson & Pontus Strimling & Michele Gelfand & Junhui Wu & Jered Abernathy & Charity S. Akotia & Alisher Aldashev & Per A. Andersson & Giulia Andrighetto & Adote Anum & Gizem Arikan & Zeynep Ay, 2021. "Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Craig Smith, N. & Simpson, Sally S. & Huang, Chun-Yao, 2007. "Why Managers Fail to do the Right Thing: An Empirical Study of Unethical and Illegal Conduct," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 633-667, October.
    3. Antonis Stylianou & Susan Winter & Yuan Niu & Robert Giacalone & Matt Campbell, 2013. "Understanding the Behavioral Intention to Report Unethical Information Technology Practices: The Role of Machiavellianism, Gender, and Computer Expertise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 333-343, October.
    4. Kimmo Eriksson & Pontus Strimling & Michele Gelfand & Junhui Wu & Jered Abernathy & Charity S. Akotia & Alisher Aldashev & Per A. Andersson & Giulia Andrighetto & Adote Anum & Gizem Arikan & Zeynep Ay, 2021. "Author Correction: Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-2, December.
    5. Zinko, Robert & Rubin, Mark, 2015. "Personal reputation and the organization," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 217-236, March.
    6. Stefano Pagliaro & Marco Brambilla & Simona Sacchi & Manuela D’Angelo & Naomi Ellemers, 2013. "Initial Impressions Determine Behaviours: Morality Predicts the Willingness to Help Newcomers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 37-44, September.
    7. Cristina Neesham & Jun Gu, 2015. "Strengthening Moral Judgment: A Moral Identity-Based Leverage Strategy in Business Ethics Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 527-534, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashraf, Badar Nadeem & Goodell, John W., 2022. "The impact of social cohesion on stock market resilience: Evidence from COVID-19," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    2. Natalie Nitsche & Ansgar Hudde, 2022. "Countries embracing maternal employment opened schools sooner after Covid-19 lockdowns," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-008, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    3. Dimcea Andrei, 2023. "The Impact of Social Norms on Stock Liquidity," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 68(1), pages 78-99, April.
    4. Pedro FrancŽs-G—mez & Lorenzo Sacconi & Marco Faillo, 2012. "Behavioral Business Ethics as a Method for Normative Business Ethics," Econometica Working Papers wp42, Econometica.
    5. Agnieszka Walczak-Skałecka, 2023. "From Start-Up Capital to Diversification and Sustainability of Personal Branding Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Valentine, Sean & Godkin, Lynn, 2019. "Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 277-288.
    7. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Dilemmas, Conspiracies, and Sophie’s Choice: Vignette Themes and Ethical Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 639-653, December.
    8. Bernardo de Abreu Guelber Fajardo & Ricardo Lopes Cardoso, 2014. "Does the Occasion Justify the Denunciation?: a Multilevel Approach for Brazilian Accountants," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 11(5), pages 24-48, October.
    9. Macarena Vallejo-Martín & Jesús M. Canto & Jesús E. San Martín García & Fabiola Perles Novas, 2020. "Prejudice and Feeling of Threat towards Syrian Refugees: The Moderating Effects of Precarious Employment and Perceived Low Outgroup Morality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, September.
    10. Demirbağ Orkun & Demir Hale Cide & Yozgat Uğur, 2020. "Political Will, Political Skill, Network Resources and Personal Reputation: A Serial Two-Mediator Model," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 26-56, September.
    11. Eugen Dimant & Tobias Gesche, 2021. "Nudging Enforcers: How Norm Perceptions and Motives for Lying Shape Sanctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9385, CESifo.
    12. Will Drover & Jennifer Franczak & Richard Beltramini, 2012. "A 30-Year Historical Examination of Ethical Concerns Regarding Business Ethics: Who’s Concerned?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(4), pages 431-438, December.
    13. Blunden, Hayley & Steffel, Mary, 2023. "The downside of decision delegation: When transferring decision responsibility incurs interpersonal costs," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Gazley, Aaron & Sinha, Ashish & Rod, Michel, 2016. "Toward a theory of marketing law transgressions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 476-483.
    15. Kirsten Martin, 2012. "Diminished or Just Different? A Factorial Vignette Study of Privacy as a Social Contract," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(4), pages 519-539, December.
    16. Tara Shawver & Lynn Clements, 2015. "Are There Gender Differences When Professional Accountants Evaluate Moral Intensity for Earnings Management?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 557-566, October.
    17. Rahizah Sulaiman & Paul Toulson & David Brougham & Frieder Lempp & Jarrod Haar, 2022. "The Role of Religiosity in Ethical Decision-Making: A Study on Islam and the Malaysian Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 297-313, August.
    18. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Ethical Judgments: What Do We Know, Where Do We Go?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 575-597, July.
    19. Razana Juhaida Johari & Nordayana Sri Ridzoan & Arumega Zarefar, 2019. "The Influence of Work Overload, Time Pressure and Social Influence Pressure on Auditors¡¯ Job Performance," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 88-106, May.
    20. Luca Casali, Gian & Perano, Mirko, 2021. "Forty years of research on factors influencing ethical decision making: Establishing a future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 614-630.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:189:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05355-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.