IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ijhcfe/v18y2018i2d10.1007_s10754-017-9230-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of diabetes follow-up care and hospital admissions

Author

Listed:
  • L. F. Andrade

    (MGEN Foundation for Public Health
    University of Paris Descartes)

  • T. Rapp

    (University of Paris Descartes
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

  • C. Sevilla-Dedieu

    (MGEN Foundation for Public Health)

Abstract

Diabetes may lead to severe complications. For this reason, disease prevention and improvement of medical follow-up represent major public health issues. The aim of this study was to measure the impact of adherence to French follow-up guidelines on hospitalization of people with diabetes. We used insurance claims data from the years 2010 to 2013 collected for 52,027 people aged over 18, affiliated to a French social security provider and treated for diabetes. We estimated panel data models to explore the association between adherence to guidelines and different measures of hospitalization, controlling for socioeconomic characteristics, diabetes treatment and density of medical supply. The results show that adherence to four guidelines was associated with a significant decrease in hospital admissions, up to approximatively 30% for patients monitored for a complete lipid profile or microalbuminuria during the year. In addition, our analyses confirmed the strong protective effect of income and a significant positive correlation with good supply of hospital care. In conclusion, good adherence to French diabetes guidelines seems to be in line with the prevention of health events, notably complications, that could necessitate hospitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • L. F. Andrade & T. Rapp & C. Sevilla-Dedieu, 2018. "Quality of diabetes follow-up care and hospital admissions," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 153-167, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:18:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10754-017-9230-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10754-017-9230-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10754-017-9230-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10754-017-9230-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonie Sundmacher & Thomas Kopetsch, 2015. "The impact of office-based care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(4), pages 365-375, May.
    2. Olivier Nay & Sophie Béjean & Daniel Benamouzig & Henri Bergeron & Patrick Castel & Bruno Ventelou, 2016. "Archieving universal health coverage in France: policy reforms and the challenge of inequalities," Post-Print hal-01318942, HAL.
    3. Anthony Scott & Stefanie Schurer & Paul H. Jensen & Peter Sivey, 2009. "The effects of an incentive program on quality of care in diabetes management," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(9), pages 1091-1108, September.
    4. Rodwin, V.G., 2003. "The health care system under French national health insurance: Lessons for health reform in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(1), pages 31-37.
    5. Iezzi, Elisa & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina, 2014. "The role of GP's compensation schemes in diabetes care: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 104-120.
    6. Gianluca Fiorentini & Elisa Iezzi & Matteo Lippi Bruni & Cristina Ugolini, 2011. "Incentives in primary care and their impact on potentially avoidable hospital admissions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(4), pages 297-309, August.
    7. Kaestner, Robert & Sasso, Anthony T. Lo, 2015. "Does seeing the doctor more often keep you out of the hospital?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 259-272.
    8. Jasmin Kantarevic & Boris Kralj, 2013. "Link Between Pay For Performance Incentives And Physician Payment Mechanisms: Evidence From The Diabetes Management Incentive In Ontario," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(12), pages 1417-1439, December.
    9. Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Nobilio, Lucia & Ugolini, Cristina, 2009. "Economic incentives in general practice: The impact of pay-for-participation and pay-for-compliance programs on diabetes care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(2-3), pages 140-148, May.
    10. Jeffrey Clemens & Joshua D. Gottlieb, 2014. "Do Physicians' Financial Incentives Affect Medical Treatment and Patient Health?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(4), pages 1320-1349, April.
    11. Andrew M. Jones, 2012. "health econometrics," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,, Palgrave Macmillan.
    12. Michael Anderson & Carlos Dobkin & Tal Gross, 2012. "The Effect of Health Insurance Coverage on the Use of Medical Services," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iversen, Tor & Ching-to , Albert Ma, 2020. "Technology Adoption in Primary Health Care," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2020:4, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme.
    2. Tor Iversen & Ching‐to Albert Ma, 2022. "Technology adoption by primary care physicians," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 443-465, March.
    3. Clémence Bussière & Nicolas Sirven & Thomas Rapp & Christine Sevilla‐Dedieu, 2020. "Adherence to medical follow‐up recommendations reduces hospital admissions: Evidence from diabetic patients in France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 508-522, April.
    4. Ugolini, Cristina & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Leucci, Anna Caterina & Fiorentini, Gianluca & Berti, Elena & Nobilio, Lucia & Moro, Maria Luisa, 2019. "Disease management in diabetes care: When involving GPs improves patient compliance and health outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 955-962.
    5. Xin Wang & Kuimeng Song & Lijin Chen & Yixiang Huang & Stephen Birch, 2021. "Eliciting Preferences of Providers in Primary Care Settings for Post Hospital Discharge Patient Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ugolini, Cristina & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Leucci, Anna Caterina & Fiorentini, Gianluca & Berti, Elena & Nobilio, Lucia & Moro, Maria Luisa, 2019. "Disease management in diabetes care: When involving GPs improves patient compliance and health outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 955-962.
    2. Iezzi, Elisa & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina, 2014. "The role of GP's compensation schemes in diabetes care: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 104-120.
    3. Fiorentini, Gianluca & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina, 2013. "GPs and hospital expenditures. Should we keep expenditure containment programs alive?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 10-20.
    4. Dusheiko, Mark & Gravelle, Hugh & Martin, Stephen & Rice, Nigel & Smith, Peter C., 2011. "Does better disease management in primary care reduce hospital costs? Evidence from English primary care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 919-932.
    5. Thaksha Thavam & Rose Anne Devlin & Amardeep Thind & Gregory S. Zaric & Sisira Sarma, 2020. "The impact of the diabetes management incentive on diabetes-related services: evidence from Ontario, Canada," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(9), pages 1279-1293, December.
    6. Clémence Bussière & Nicolas Sirven & Thomas Rapp & Christine Sevilla‐Dedieu, 2020. "Adherence to medical follow‐up recommendations reduces hospital admissions: Evidence from diabetic patients in France," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 508-522, April.
    7. Mark Dusheiko & Hugh Gravelle & Stephen Martin & Nigel Rice & Peter C Smith, 2011. "Does Better Disease Management in Primary Care Reduce Hospital Costs?," Working Papers 065cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    8. Matteo Lippi Bruni & Cristina Ugolini & Rossella Verzulli & Anna Caterina Leucci, 2023. "The impact of Community Health Centers on inappropriate use of emergency services," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 375-394, February.
    9. Matteo Lippi Bruni & Irene Mammi, 2017. "Spatial effects in hospital expenditures: A district level analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S2), pages 63-77, September.
    10. Anne-Laure Feral-Pierssens & Claire Rives-Lange & Joane Matta & Victor G. Rodwin & Marcel Goldberg & Philippe Juvin & Marie Zins & Claire Carette & Sebastien Czernichow, 2020. "Forgoing health care under universal health insurance: the case of France," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(5), pages 617-625, June.
    11. Ammi, Mehdi & Fortier, Grant, 2017. "The influence of welfare systems on pay-for-performance programs for general practitioners: A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 157-166.
    12. Kurt R. Brekke & Tor Helge Holmås & Karin Monstad & Odd Rune Straume, 2018. "Socio‐economic status and physicians' treatment decisions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 77-89, March.
    13. Mengna Luan & Wenjing Shi & Zhigang Tao & Hongjie Yuan, 2023. "When patients have better insurance coverage in China: Provider incentives, costs, and quality of care," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 1073-1106, October.
    14. Rong Fu & Yichen Shen & Haruko Noguchi, 2021. "The best of both worlds? The economic effects of a hybrid fee‐for‐service and prospective payment reimbursement system," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 505-524, March.
    15. Wen He, 2022. "Effects of establishing a financing scheme for outpatient care on inpatient services: empirical evidence from a quasi-experiment in China," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(1), pages 7-22, February.
    16. Anne-Laure Feral-Pierssens & Claire Rives-Lange & Joane Matta & Victor G. Rodwin & Marcel Goldberg & Philippe Juvin & Marie Zins & Claire Carette & Sebastien Czernichow, 0. "Forgoing health care under universal health insurance: the case of France," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 0, pages 1-9.
    17. Tor Iversen & Hilde Lurås, 2012. "Capitation and Incentives in Primary Care," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Pedersen, Line Bjørnskov & Andersen, Merethe Kirstine Kousgaard & Jensen, Ulrich Thy & Waldorff, Frans Boch & Jacobsen, Christian Bøtcher, 2018. "Can external interventions crowd in intrinsic motivation? A cluster randomised field experiment on mandatory accreditation of general practice in Denmark," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 224-233.
    19. Islam, M. Kamrul & Kjerstad, Egil, 2017. "Is incentivizing by subsidizing a better way of managing chronic health conditions?," Working Papers in Economics 12/17, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    20. repec:nip:nipewp:05/2015 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Hudson, Eibhlin & Nolan, Anne, 2015. "Public healthcare eligibility and the utilisation of GP services by older people in Ireland," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 24-43.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Chronic disease follow-up; Hospital admissions; Panel data;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ijhcfe:v:18:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10754-017-9230-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.