IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/iujspc/v0y2021i80p139-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mesleki Sonuç Beklentisinin Sendikal Farkındalık Ve Sendikal Tutuma Olan Etkisi: İİBF Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Author

Listed:
  • Ebru Kanyilmaz Polat

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Biga Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi, Çanakkale, Türkiye)

  • Siyret Ayas Şarman

    (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İktisat Fakültesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

  • Bahattin Hamarat

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Turizm Fakültesi, Çanakkale, Türkiye.)

Abstract

Türkiye, OECD ülkeleri arasında sendikalaşma oranı en düşük ülkeler arasında yer almaktadır. 2021 yılı Ocak ayında sendikalaşma oranı %14,40 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Bu oran yaklaşık 14 milyon işçi arasında oldukça sınırlı kalmaktadır. Bireylerin sendikalara yönelik tutum ve farkındalığının sendikalaşma eğilimini belirleyen önemli faktörler olduğu bilinmektedir. Sendikaların işçi haklarını savunan, işçilerin çıkarlarını yükseltebilen örgütler olduğuna yönelik algı ve farkındalığı olan bireylerin sendikalara üye olma oranlarının daha yüksek olacağı düşünülmektedir. Diğer yandan bireysel pazarlık gücü artan nitelikli ve eğitimli işgücünün sendikalara daha az gereksinim duyduğu bilinmektedir. Bu çerçevede çalışmada kısa bir süre sonra işgücü piyasasına giriş yapması beklenen İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi (İİBF) dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri ile nicel bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada üniversite öğrencilerinin mesleki sonuç beklentisi ve sendikal farkındalıklarının sendikal tutuma etkisi Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca öğrencilerin sendikal farkındalıklarının düzenleyici etkiye sahip olup olmadığı da incelenmiştir. Veriler anket tekniği ve kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile elde edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda öğrencilerin mesleki sonuç beklentisinin sendikal tutuma etkisi belirlenmez iken sendikal farkındalık artarken sendikal tutumun artığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca mesleki sonuç beklentisinin sendikal farkındalık üzerinden sendikal tutumu dolaylı etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada son olarak sendikal farkındalığın düzenleyici etkiye sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebru Kanyilmaz Polat & Siyret Ayas Şarman & Bahattin Hamarat, 2021. "Mesleki Sonuç Beklentisinin Sendikal Farkındalık Ve Sendikal Tutuma Olan Etkisi: İİBF Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(80), pages 139-174, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2021:i:80:p:139-174
    DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2021.80.000340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/FB31E16BC7A143F4B4BE144DE1FF4A52
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/en/journal/jspc/article/mesleki-sonuc-beklentisinin-sendikal-farkindalik-ve-sendikal-tutuma-olan-etkisi-iibf-ogrencileri-uzerine-bir-arastirma
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/jspc.2021.80.000340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andy Hodder & Lefteris Kretsos, 2015. "Young Workers and Unions: Context and Overview," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Andy Hodder & Lefteris Kretsos (ed.), Young Workers and Trade Unions, chapter 1, pages 1-15, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Rafael Gomez & Morley Gunderson & Noah Meltz, 2002. "Comparing Youth and Adult Desire for Unionization in Canada," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 40(3), pages 542-519, September.
    3. Stephen Deery & Helen Cieri, 1991. "Determinants of Trade Union Membership in Australia," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 59-73, March.
    4. Steven McShane, 1986. "General union attitude: A construct validation," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 403-417, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaona, Andrea, 2006. "The duration of union membership: An empirical study," Kiel Working Papers 1268, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Olivier Guillot & Magali Jaoul-Grammare & Isabelle Terraz, 2019. "Union Membership in France: An Empirical Study," Working Papers of BETA 2019-04, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Erling Barth & Alex Bryson & Harald Dale-Olsen, 2022. "Turning Non-members into Members: Do Public Subsidies to Union Membership Matter?," DoQSS Working Papers 22-05, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    4. Goerke, Laszlo & Pannenberg, Markus, 2011. "Trade union membership and dismissals," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 810-821.
    5. Jonathan E. Booth & John W. Budd & Kristen M. Munday, 2010. "Never Say Never? Uncovering the Never‐Unionized in the United States," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 26-52, March.
    6. Dr Alex Bryson, 2014. "What Accounts for the Union Member Advantage in Voter Turnout? Evidence from the European Union, 2002-2008," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 428, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    7. Alex Bryson & Richard Freeman & Rafael Gomez & Paul Willman, 2017. "The Twin Track Model of Employee Voice: An Anglo-American Perspective on Union Decline and the Rise of Alternative Forms of Voice," DoQSS Working Papers 17-13, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    8. Jo Blanden & Stephen Machin, 2003. "Cross‐Generation Correlations of Union Status for Young People in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 41(3), pages 391-415, September.
    9. Dr Sukhan Jackson & Helen Higgs & Glenda Cooper, 2002. "Determinants Of Unionisation For Part-Time Women Employees In Australian Banks," Discussion Papers Series 317, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    10. Tom Redman & Ed Snape, 2014. "The antecedents of union commitment and participation: evaluating moderation effects across unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 486-506, November.
    11. Michael Dobbie & Daehoon Nahm, 2018. "The Determinants of Individual Union Membership in Australia: A Structural Approach Using Panel Data," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 37(1), pages 75-91, March.
    12. Alexandre J. S. Morin & Daniel G. Gallagher & John P. Meyer & David Litalien & Paul F. Clark, 2021. "Investigating the Dimensionality and Stability of Union Commitment Profiles over a 10-Year Period: A Latent Transition Analysis," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(1), pages 224-254, January.
    13. Veliziotis, Michail, 2010. "Trade unions and unpaid overtime in Britain," ISER Working Paper Series 2010-43, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    14. Dr Alex Bryson, 2014. "What Accounts for the Union Member Advantage in Voter Turnout? Evidence from the European Union, 2002-2008," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 428, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    15. Goerke, Laszlo, 1997. "Taxes in an open shop trade union model," Discussion Papers, Series II 346, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    16. Erling Barth & Alex Bryson & Harald Dale-Olsen, 2020. "Do Public Subsidies of Union Membership Increase Union Membership Rates?," DoQSS Working Papers 20-14, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    17. Paula Armstrong & Janca Steenkamp, 2008. "South African Trade Unions: an Overview for 1995 to 2005," Working Papers 10/2008, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    18. Mark Wooden & Jeffrey Balchin, 1993. "Unionization in Australia: Evidence from the AWIRS," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 69(3), pages 305-314, September.
    19. Huw Beynon & Helen Blakely & Alex Bryson & Rhys Davies, 2021. "The Persistence of Union Membership within the Coalfields of Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1131-1152, December.
    20. Blanchflower, David G., 2006. "A Cross-Country Study of Union Membership," IZA Discussion Papers 2016, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2021:i:80:p:139-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.