IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v53y2019i6p1751-1771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Robust Pairing Model for Airline Crew Scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • David Antunes

    (CITTA, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra 3030-788, Portugal)

  • Vikrant Vaze

    (Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755)

  • António Pais Antunes

    (CITTA, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra 3030-788, Portugal)

Abstract

Delays and disruptions in airline operations annually result in billions of dollars of additional costs to airlines, passengers, and the economy. Airlines strive to mitigate these costs by creating schedules that are less likely to get disrupted or schedules that are easier to repair when there are disruptions. In this paper, we present a robust optimization model for the crew pairing problem, which generates crew schedules that are less likely to get disrupted. Our model allows adding robustness without requiring detailed knowledge of the underlying delay distributions. Moreover, our model allows us to capture in detail the delay propagation through crew connections and the complex cost structure of the pay-and-credit crew salary scheme, thus enabling us to find a good trade-off between the deterministic component of the planned costs on the one hand and the expected delay and disruption costs on the other hand. Our robust crew pairing model is based on a deterministic crew pairing model formulated as a mixed-integer linear program. The robust version that we propose retains the linearity of the constraints and objective function and thus can be handled by commercial solvers, which facilitates its implementation in practice. We propose and implement a new solution algorithm for solving our model to optimality. Several optimal solutions with varying robustness levels are compared for the network of a moderate-size airline in the United States. We test the model’s solutions in a simulation environment using real-world delay data. Our simulation results show that the robust crew pairing solutions lead to lower delays and fewer instances of operational infeasibilities, thus requiring fewer recovery actions to address them. We find that, with the inclusion of robustness, it is possible to generate crew pairing solutions that significantly reduce the delay and disruption costs with only a small increase in planned costs.

Suggested Citation

  • David Antunes & Vikrant Vaze & António Pais Antunes, 2019. "A Robust Pairing Model for Airline Crew Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1751-1771, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:53:y:2019:i:6:p:1751-1771
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2019.0897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2019.0897
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2019.0897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew J. Schaefer & Ellis L. Johnson & Anton J. Kleywegt & George L. Nemhauser, 2005. "Airline Crew Scheduling Under Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 340-348, August.
    2. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    3. Pamela H. Vance & Cynthia Barnhart & Ellis L. Johnson & George L. Nemhauser, 1997. "Airline Crew Scheduling: A New Formulation and Decomposition Algorithm," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 188-200, April.
    4. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Sun, 2007. "A Robust Optimization Perspective on Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1058-1071, December.
    5. Da Lu & Fatma Gzara, 2015. "The robust crew pairing problem: model and solution methodology," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 29-54, May.
    6. Sergey Shebalov & Diego Klabjan, 2006. "Robust Airline Crew Pairing: Move-up Crews," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 300-312, August.
    7. Chunhua Gao & Ellis Johnson & Barry Smith, 2009. "Integrated Airline Fleet and Crew Robust Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 2-16, February.
    8. Michelle Dunbar & Gary Froyland & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2012. "Robust Airline Schedule Planning: Minimizing Propagated Delay in an Integrated Routing and Crewing Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 204-216, May.
    9. Shervin AhmadBeygi & Amy Cohn & Marcial Lapp, 2010. "Decreasing airline delay propagation by re-allocating scheduled slack," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 478-489.
    10. Cynthia Barnhart & Douglas Fearing & Vikrant Vaze, 2014. "Modeling Passenger Travel and Delays in the National Air Transportation System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 580-601, June.
    11. Joyce W. Yen & John R. Birge, 2006. "A Stochastic Programming Approach to the Airline Crew Scheduling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 3-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeighami, Vahid & Saddoune, Mohammed & Soumis, François, 2020. "Alternating Lagrangian decomposition for integrated airline crew scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 211-224.
    2. Xu, Yifan & Wandelt, Sebastian & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2021. "Airline integrated robust scheduling with a variable neighborhood search based heuristic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 181-203.
    3. Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Sun, Yige & Yue, Xiaohang, 2021. "Airline crew scheduling: Models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    4. Wen, Xin & Ma, Hoi-Lam & Chung, Sai-Ho & Khan, Waqar Ahmed, 2020. "Robust airline crew scheduling with flight flying time variability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Birolini, Sebastian & Jacquillat, Alexandre & Cattaneo, Mattia & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Airline Network Planning: Mixed-integer non-convex optimization with demand–supply interactions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 100-124.
    6. Xiaoqian Sun & Sebastian Wandelt, 2021. "Robustness of Air Transportation as Complex Networks:Systematic Review of 15 Years of Research and Outlook into the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keji Wei & Vikrant Vaze, 2018. "Modeling Crew Itineraries and Delays in the National Air Transportation System," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1276-1296, October.
    2. Liang, Zhe & Feng, Yuan & Zhang, Xiaoning & Wu, Tao & Chaovalitwongse, Wanpracha Art, 2015. "Robust weekly aircraft maintenance routing problem and the extension to the tail assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 238-259.
    3. Xu, Yifan & Wandelt, Sebastian & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2021. "Airline integrated robust scheduling with a variable neighborhood search based heuristic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 181-203.
    4. Mohamed Haouari & Farah Zeghal Mansour & Hanif D. Sherali, 2019. "A New Compact Formulation for the Daily Crew Pairing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 811-828, May.
    5. Da Lu & Fatma Gzara, 2015. "The robust crew pairing problem: model and solution methodology," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 29-54, May.
    6. Jane Lee & Lavanya Marla & Alexandre Jacquillat, 2020. "Dynamic Disruption Management in Airline Networks Under Airport Operating Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 973-997, July.
    7. Chiwei Yan & Jerry Kung, 2018. "Robust Aircraft Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 118-133, January.
    8. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-191.
    9. Sai Ho Chung & Hoi Lam Ma & Hing Kai Chan, 2017. "Cascading Delay Risk of Airline Workforce Deployments with Crew Pairing and Schedule Optimization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1443-1458, August.
    10. Mohammed Saddoune & Guy Desaulniers & Issmail Elhallaoui & François Soumis, 2012. "Integrated Airline Crew Pairing and Crew Assignment by Dynamic Constraint Aggregation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 39-55, February.
    11. Sujeevraja Sanjeevi & Saravanan Venkatachalam, 2021. "Robust flight schedules with stochastic programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 403-421, October.
    12. Zhang, Wei & (Ato) Xu, Wangtu, 2017. "Simulation-based robust optimization for the schedule of single-direction bus transit route: The design of experiment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 203-230.
    13. Michelle Dunbar & Gary Froyland & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2012. "Robust Airline Schedule Planning: Minimizing Propagated Delay in an Integrated Routing and Crewing Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 204-216, May.
    14. Gary Froyland & Stephen J. Maher & Cheng-Lung Wu, 2014. "The Recoverable Robust Tail Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 351-372, August.
    15. Atoosa Kasirzadeh & Mohammed Saddoune & François Soumis, 2017. "Airline crew scheduling: models, algorithms, and data sets," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 111-137, June.
    16. Vahid Zeighami & François Soumis, 2019. "Combining Benders’ Decomposition and Column Generation for Integrated Crew Pairing and Personalized Crew Assignment Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1479-1499, September.
    17. Mac Cawley, Alejandro & Maturana, Sergio & Pascual, Rodrigo & Tortorella, Guilherme Luz, 2022. "Scheduling wine bottling operations with multiple lines and sequence-dependent set-up times: Robust formulation and a decomposition solution approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 819-839.
    18. Birolini, Sebastian & Jacquillat, Alexandre, 2023. "Day-ahead aircraft routing with data-driven primary delay predictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 379-396.
    19. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    20. Okan Örsan Özener & Melda Örmeci Matoğlu & Güneş Erdoğan & Mohamed Haouari & Hasan Sözer, 2017. "Solving a large-scale integrated fleet assignment and crew pairing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 477-500, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:53:y:2019:i:6:p:1751-1771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.