IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v61y2013i4p941-956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supermodularity and Affine Policies in Dynamic Robust Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Dan A. Iancu

    (Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Mayank Sharma

    (IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598)

  • Maxim Sviridenko

    (Computer Science Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom)

Abstract

This paper considers a particular class of dynamic robust optimization problems, where a large number of decisions must be made in the first stage, which consequently fix the constraints and cost structure underlying a one-dimensional, linear dynamical system. We seek to bridge two classical paradigms for solving such problems, namely, (1) dynamic programming (DP), and (2) policies parameterized in model uncertainties (also known as decision rules), obtained by solving tractable convex optimization problems.We show that if the uncertainty sets are integer sublattices of the unit hypercube, the DP value functions are convex and supermodular in the uncertain parameters, and a certain technical condition is satisfied, then decision rules that are affine in the uncertain parameters are optimal. We also derive conditions under which such rules can be obtained by optimizing simple (i.e., linear) objective functions over the uncertainty sets. Our results suggest new modeling paradigms for dynamic robust optimization, and our proofs, which bring together ideas from three areas of optimization typically studied separately—robust optimization, combinatorial optimization (the theory of lattice programming and supermodularity), and global optimization (the theory of concave envelopes)—may be of independent interest.We exemplify our findings in a class of applications concerning the design of flexible production processes, where a retailer seeks to optimally compute a set of strategic decisions (before the start of a selling season), as well as in-season replenishment policies. We show that, when the costs incurred are jointly convex, replenishment policies that depend linearly on the realized demands are optimal. When the costs are also piecewise affine, all the optimal decisions can be found by solving a single linear program of small size (when all decisions are continuous) or a mixed-integer, linear program of the same size (when some strategic decisions are discrete).

Suggested Citation

  • Dan A. Iancu & Mayank Sharma & Maxim Sviridenko, 2013. "Supermodularity and Affine Policies in Dynamic Robust Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 941-956, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:61:y:2013:i:4:p:941-956
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2013.1172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1172
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2013.1172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Peter Hansen & Thomas J Sargent, 2014. "Robust Control and Model Uncertainty," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: UNCERTAINTY WITHIN ECONOMIC MODELS, chapter 5, pages 145-154, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Andrew J. Clark & Herbert Scarf, 2004. "Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1782-1790, December.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    4. Epstein, Larry G. & Schneider, Martin, 2003. "Recursive multiple-priors," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 1-31, November.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Dan A. Iancu & Pablo A. Parrilo, 2010. "Optimality of Affine Policies in Multistage Robust Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 363-394, May.
    6. Warren H. Hausman, 1969. "Sequential Decision Problems: A Model to Exploit Existing Forecasters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 93-111, October.
    7. ,, 2002. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 1007-1017, August.
    8. Gorissen, Bram L. & den Hertog, Dick, 2013. "Robust counterparts of inequalities containing sums of maxima of linear functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 30-43.
    9. Paul Zipkin, 2008. "On the Structure of Lost-Sales Inventory Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 937-944, August.
    10. ,, 2002. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(6), pages 1461-1465, December.
    11. ,, 2002. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 193-194, February.
    12. ,, 2002. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 1273-1289, October.
    13. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper & G. H. Symonds, 1958. "Cost Horizons and Certainty Equivalents: An Approach to Stochastic Programming of Heating Oil," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 235-263, April.
    14. Arthur F. Veinott, Jr., 1966. "The Status of Mathematical Inventory Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(11), pages 745-777, July.
    15. Woonghee Tim Huh & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2010. "On the Optimal Policy Structure in Serial Inventory Systems with Lost Sales," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 486-491, April.
    16. ,, 2002. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 819-821, June.
    17. ,, 2002. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 541-545, April.
    18. Stephen C. Graves & David B. Kletter & William B. Hetzel, 1998. "A Dynamic Model for Requirements Planning with Application to Supply Chain Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3-supplem), pages 35-49, June.
    19. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization and Its Tractable Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 902-917, August.
    20. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Sun & Jiawei Zhang, 2008. "A Linear Decision-Based Approximation Approach to Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 344-357, April.
    21. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2009. "Information Sharing and Order Variability Control Under a Generalized Demand Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 781-797, May.
    22. Chuen-Teck See & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Robust Approximation to Multiperiod Inventory Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 583-594, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Dan A. Iancu & Pablo A. Parrilo, 2010. "Optimality of Affine Policies in Multistage Robust Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 363-394, May.
    2. Soleimanian, Azam & Salmani Jajaei, Ghasemali, 2013. "Robust nonlinear optimization with conic representable uncertainty set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 337-344.
    3. Garud N. Iyengar, 2005. "Robust Dynamic Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 257-280, May.
    4. Siyang Xie & Xi Chen & Zhaodong Wang & Yanfeng Ouyang & Kamalesh Somani & Jing Huang, 2016. "Integrated Planning for Multiple Types of Locomotive Work Facilities Under Location, Routing, and Inventory Considerations," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 391-408, October.
    5. Luo, Fengqiao & Mehrotra, Sanjay, 2019. "Decomposition algorithm for distributionally robust optimization using Wasserstein metric with an application to a class of regression models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 20-35.
    6. Areesh Mittal & Can Gokalp & Grani A. Hanasusanto, 2020. "Robust Quadratic Programming with Mixed-Integer Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 201-218, April.
    7. Ryoichi Nishimura & Shunsuke Hayashi & Masao Fukushima, 2013. "SDP reformulation for robust optimization problems based on nonconvex QP duality," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 21-47, May.
    8. Artur Alves Pessoa & Michael Poss, 2015. "Robust Network Design with Uncertain Outsourcing Cost," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 507-524, August.
    9. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "On the applicability and solution of bilevel optimization models in transportation science: A study on the existence, stability and computation of optimal solutions to stochastic mathematical programs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 843-860, December.
    10. Nikulin, Yury, 2006. "Robustness in combinatorial optimization and scheduling theory: An extended annotated bibliography," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 606, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    11. Claudia García-García & Catalina B. García-García & Román Salmerón, 2021. "Confronting collinearity in environmental regression models: evidence from world data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 895-926, September.
    12. Cambier, Adrien & Chardy, Matthieu & Figueiredo, Rosa & Ouorou, Adam & Poss, Michael, 2022. "Optimizing subscriber migrations for a telecommunication operator in uncertain context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 308-321.
    13. Libura, Marek, 2007. "On the adjustment problem for linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 125-134, November.
    14. Christophe Loussouarn & Carine Franc & Yann Videau & Julien Mousquès, 2021. "Can General Practitioners Be More Productive? The Impact of Teamwork and Cooperation with Nurses on GP Activities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 680-698, March.
    15. Tschakert, Petra, 2016. "Shifting Discourses of Vilification and the Taming of Unruly Mining Landscapes in Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 123-132.
    16. María-Consuelo Casabán & Rafael Company & Lucas Jódar, 2020. "Non-Gaussian Quadrature Integral Transform Solution of Parabolic Models with a Finite Degree of Randomness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Isabelle Boutron & Peter John & David J. Torgerson, 2010. "Reporting Methodological Items in Randomized Experiments in Political Science," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 628(1), pages 112-131, March.
    18. Ben Slimane, Faten & Padilla Angulo, Laura, 2019. "Strategic change and corporate governance: Evidence from the stock exchange industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 206-218.
    19. Bossert, Walter & Derks, Jean & Peters, Hans, 2005. "Efficiency in uncertain cooperative games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 12-23, July.
    20. Weijun Xie & Yanfeng Ouyang & Sze Chun Wong, 2016. "Reliable Location-Routing Design Under Probabilistic Facility Disruptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 1128-1138, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:61:y:2013:i:4:p:941-956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.