IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i2p437-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Interventions to Promote Agricultural Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Duygu Akkaya
  • Kostas Bimpikis
  • Hau Lee

Abstract

Problem definition : Agricultural innovation can help farmers improve their productivity; reduce their environmental impact; and address the challenges associated with ever-changing soil, weather, and market conditions. Promoting innovation often requires government support as a way to incentivize producers to experiment with (and then eventually adopt) cutting-edge practices. We investigate the effectiveness of a number of policy instruments (i.e., taxes and subsidies) in terms of their impact on the adoption of innovative production methods, producers’ profits, consumer surplus, and return on government expenditure. Academic/practical relevance : We contribute to the existing literature by investigating not only the policy maker’s role in encouraging innovation but also the role of consumer preferences and learning-by-doing benefits of new production methods. Methodology : Our setting features producers with access to traditional and innovative production methods and consumers that have a higher valuation for the output of the innovative method. We develop a model to analyze producers’ decisions of whether to experiment with a new production method when facing uncertainty about their production yield as well as the benefits associated with learning-by-doing. Results : Our findings indicate that using only taxes encourages experimentation with new production methods but decreases social welfare. Utilizing only subsidies outperforms policies that involve both taxes and subsidies in achieving higher social welfare but the converse is true in achieving a higher experimentation rate. We show that zero-expenditure policies result in a decline in social welfare unless producers face financial barriers when making the costly transition to new methods. Managerial implications : The insights we generate can help policy makers design policies to achieve specific objectives (e.g., target experimentation/adoption rates). We illustrate their applicability by conducting a numerical study using data on conventional and organic egg production in Denmark. The study generates concrete policy recommendations to achieve the organic production goal set by the Danish government.

Suggested Citation

  • Duygu Akkaya & Kostas Bimpikis & Hau Lee, 2021. "Government Interventions to Promote Agricultural Innovation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 437-452, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:2:p:437-452
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2019.0834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0834
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2019.0834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    2. Jonathan Chemama & Maxime C. Cohen & Ruben Lobel & Georgia Perakis, 2019. "Consumer Subsidies with a Strategic Supplier: Commitment vs. Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 681-713, February.
    3. Sripad K. Devalkar & Ravi Anupindi & Amitabh Sinha, 2011. "Integrated Optimization of Procurement, Processing, and Trade of Commodities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1369-1381, December.
    4. Milind Dawande & Srinagesh Gavirneni & Mili Mehrotra & Vijay Mookerjee, 2013. "Efficient Distribution of Water Between Head-Reach and Tail-End Farms in Developing Countries," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 221-238, May.
    5. Retsef Levi & Georgia Perakis & Gonzalo Romero, 2017. "On the Effectiveness of Uniform Subsidies in Increasing Market Consumption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 40-57, January.
    6. Onur Boyabatlı & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Stephen R. Koontz, 2011. "Integrating Long-Term and Short-Term Contracting in Beef Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(10), pages 1771-1787, October.
    7. Burak Kazaz & Scott Webster & Prashant Yadav, 2016. "Interventions for an Artemisinin-based Malaria Medicine Supply Chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(9), pages 1576-1600, September.
    8. Lohr, Luanne & Salomonsson, Lennart, 2000. "Conversion subsidies for organic production: results from Sweden and lessons for the United States," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 133-146, March.
    9. Kevin F. McCardle, 1985. "Information Acquisition and the Adoption of New Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(11), pages 1372-1389, November.
    10. Onur Boyabatlı & Javad Nasiry & Yangfang (Helen) Zhou, 2019. "Crop Planning in Sustainable Agriculture: Dynamic Farmland Allocation in the Presence of Crop Rotation Benefits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2060-2076, May.
    11. KS Pietola & AO Lansink, 2001. "Farmer response to policies promoting organic farming technologies in Finland," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 28(1), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Saed Alizamir & Foad Iravani & Hamed Mamani, 2019. "An Analysis of Price vs. Revenue Protection: Government Subsidies in the Agriculture Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 32-49, January.
    13. Terry A. Taylor & Wenqiang Xiao, 2014. "Subsidizing the Distribution Channel: Donor Funding to Improve the Availability of Malaria Drugs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2461-2477, October.
    14. Maxime C. Cohen & Ruben Lobel & Georgia Perakis, 2016. "The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1235-1258, May.
    15. Canan Ulu & James E. Smith, 2009. "Uncertainty, Information Acquisition, and Technology Adoption," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 740-752, June.
    16. James E. Smith & Canan Ulu, 2017. "Risk Aversion, Information Acquisition, and Technology Adoption," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1011-1028, August.
    17. Szvetlana Acs & Paul Berentsen & Ruud Huirne & Marcel van Asseldonk, 2009. "Effect of yield and price risk on conversion from conventional to organic farming ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 393-411, July.
    18. David, Cristina C., 2007. "The Philippine Hybrid Rice Program: A Case for Redesign and Scaling Down," Research Paper Series RPS 2006-03, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    19. Onur Boyabatlı & Jason Nguyen & Tong Wang, 2017. "Capacity Management in Agricultural Commodity Processing and Application in the Palm Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 551-567, October.
    20. Burak Kazaz, 2004. "Production Planning Under Yield and Demand Uncertainty with Yield-Dependent Cost and Price," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 209-224, October.
    21. Awi Federgruen & Upmanu Lall & A. Serdar Şimşek, 2019. "Supply Chain Analysis of Contract Farming," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 361-378, April.
    22. Ying-Ju Chen & Christopher S. Tang, 2015. "The Economic Value of Market Information for Farmers in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1441-1452, September.
    23. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    24. Nicky J. Welton & Howard H. Z. Thom, 2015. "Value of Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 564-566, July.
    25. Burak Kazaz & Scott Webster, 2011. "The Impact of Yield-Dependent Trading Costs on Pricing and Production Planning Under Supply Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 404-417, July.
    26. James E. Smith & Canan Ulu, 2012. "Technology Adoption with Uncertain Future Costs and Quality," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 262-274, April.
    27. Saed Alizamir & Francis de Véricourt & Peng Sun, 2016. "Efficient Feed-In-Tariff Policies for Renewable Energy Technologies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 52-66, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prashant Chintapalli & Christopher S. Tang, 2022. "Crop minimum support price versus cost subsidy: Farmer and consumer welfare," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1753-1769, April.
    2. Nan, Qiuying & Sun, Mengchan & Nie, Jiajia & Yang, Rui & Wan, Lijuan, 2023. "The efficacy of a forward market for the agricultural sector in mitigating climate risk: A potential alternative to agricultural subsidies?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    3. Sushil Gupta & Hossein Rikhtehgar Berenji & Manish Shukla & Nagesh N. Murthy, 2023. "Opportunities in farming research from an operations management perspective," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1577-1596, June.
    4. Wei Zhang & Long Gao & Mohammad Zolghadr & Dawei Jian & Mohsen ElHafsi, 2023. "Dynamic incentives for sustainable contract farming," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2049-2067, July.
    5. Xiaolong Guo & Lihong Cheng & Yugang Yu, 2022. "Government subsidy policy for green and efficient raw materials considering farmer heterogeneity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4095-4112, November.
    6. Yaoguang Zhong & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Fangfang Guo & Huajun Tang, 2021. "Research on Government Subsidy Strategies for the Development of Agricultural Products E-Commerce," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Cui, Yu & Khan, Sufyan Ullah & Sauer, Johannes & Kipperberg, Gorm & Zhao, Minjuan, 2023. "Agricultural carbon footprint, energy utilization and economic quality: What causes what, and where?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    8. Cao, Yifan & Shen, Bin, 2022. "Adopting blockchain technology to block less sustainable products’ entry in global trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Xue Wang & Jiayuan Zhang & Deqing Ma & Hao Sun, 2023. "Green Agricultural Products Supply Chain Subsidy Scheme with Green Traceability and Data-Driven Marketing of the Platform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Jiang, Zhong-Zhong & He, Na & Huang, Song, 2021. "Government penalty provision and contracting with asymmetric quality information in a bioenergy supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Pagare, Dewang & Biswas, Indranil & Agrahari, Amit & Ghosh, Sriparna, 2023. "A small farmer’s market choice in the presence of multiple markets: The Indian case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 739-753.
    12. Li, Dong & Dong, Chuanwen, 2022. "Government regulations to mitigate the shortage of life-saving goods in the face of a pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 942-955.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saed Alizamir & Foad Iravani & Hamed Mamani, 2019. "An Analysis of Price vs. Revenue Protection: Government Subsidies in the Agriculture Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 32-49, January.
    2. Lingxiu Dong, 2021. "Toward Resilient Agriculture Value Chains: Challenges and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 666-675, March.
    3. Wei Zhang & Long Gao & Mohammad Zolghadr & Dawei Jian & Mohsen ElHafsi, 2023. "Dynamic incentives for sustainable contract farming," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2049-2067, July.
    4. Sukanto Bhattacharya & Surjasama Lahiri & Munirul Nabin, 2021. "A novel technology adoption in an OLG framework: examining the cross-generational effects of promotional policies," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Qian, Xiaoyan, 2021. "Production planning and equity investment decisions in agriculture with closed membership cooperatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 684-699.
    6. Jiguang Chen & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2021. "The Impact of Contract Farming on Agricultural Product Supply in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2395-2419, August.
    7. Brozynski, Max T. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2022. "A multi-level optimization model of infrastructure-dependent technology adoption: Overcoming the chicken-and-egg problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 755-770.
    8. Guo, Yan & Yu, Xinning & Zhou, Caifeng & Lyu, Gaoyan, 2021. "Government subsidies for preventing supply disruption when the supplier has an outside option under competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    9. Nur Ayvaz‐Çavdaroğlu & Burak Kazaz & Scott Webster, 2021. "Incentivizing Farmers to Invest in Quality through Quality‐Based Payment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3812-3830, October.
    10. Guo, Qiaozhen & He, Qiao-Chu & Chen, Ying-Ju & Huang, Wei, 2021. "Poverty mitigation via solar panel adoption: Smart contracts and targeted subsidy design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    12. Zhou, Yanju & Che, Yuan, 2021. "Research on Government Logistics Subsidies for Poverty Alleviation with Non-uniform Distribution of Consumers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    13. Erica L. Plambeck & Kamalini Ramdas, 2020. "Alleviating Poverty by Empowering Women Through Business Model Innovation: Manufacturing & Service Operations Management Insights and Opportunities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 123-134, January.
    14. Zhong, Ling & Nie, Jiajia & Yue, Xiaohang & Jin, Minyue, 2023. "Optimal design of agricultural insurance subsidies under the risk of extreme weather," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    15. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    16. Ying Zhang & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2020. "Improved Crop Productivity Through Optimized Planting Schedules," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1165-1180, November.
    17. Xiaolong Guo & Lihong Cheng & Yugang Yu, 2022. "Government subsidy policy for green and efficient raw materials considering farmer heterogeneity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4095-4112, November.
    18. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    19. Brozynski, Max T. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2020. "Markov models of policy support for technology transitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1052-1069.
    20. Onur Boyabatlı & Javad Nasiry & Yangfang (Helen) Zhou, 2019. "Crop Planning in Sustainable Agriculture: Dynamic Farmland Allocation in the Presence of Crop Rotation Benefits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2060-2076, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:2:p:437-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.