IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v66y2020i4p1527-1543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Platforms and the Exploration of New Products

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei Hagiu

    (Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215)

  • Julian Wright

    (Department of Economics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570, Republic of Singapore)

Abstract

A key strategic decision for platforms is the extent to which they should facilitate the entry of untested new products and sellers alongside established products and sellers. Exploration by current buyers helps future buyers better value these products and sellers. This externality across buyers raises the possibility that there may be too little exploration from the platform’s perspective. On the other hand, when sellers have market power and so price strategically, and platforms extract a share of seller revenue (i.e., charge commissions), the direction of any such bias is not obvious. We provide a theory that predicts when the platform will prefer more, less, or the same level of exploration as that induced by sellers in equilibrium. Our theory can explain why platforms will sometimes have no incentive to steer buyers one way or another, or may actually want to steer buyers toward established products and sellers.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2020. "Platforms and the Exploration of New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(4), pages 1527-1543, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:4:p:1527-1543
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3272
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yiangos Papanastasiou & Nicos Savva, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Social Learning and Strategic Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 919-939, April.
    2. Dirk Bergemann & Juuso Valimaki, 1997. "Market Diffusion with Two-Sided Learning," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 28(4), pages 773-795, Winter.
    3. Bergemann, Dirk & Valimaki, Juuso, 1996. "Learning and Strategic Pricing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(5), pages 1125-1149, September.
    4. Dirk Bergemann & Juuso Välimäki, 2000. "Experimentation in Markets," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 67(2), pages 213-234.
    5. Davide Crapis & Bar Ifrach & Costis Maglaras & Marco Scarsini, 2017. "Monopoly Pricing in the Presence of Social Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3586-3608, November.
    6. Lewis, Tracy R & Sappington, David E M, 1994. "Supplying Information to Facilitate Price Discrimination," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 35(2), pages 309-327, May.
    7. Nikolaos Vettas, 1998. "Demand and Supply in New Markets: Diffusion with Bilateral Learning," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 29(1), pages 215-233, Spring.
    8. Amir Ajorlou & Ali Jadbabaie & Ali Kakhbod, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing in Social Networks: The Word-of-Mouth Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 971-979, February.
    9. Dirk Bergemann & Juuso Välimäki, 2006. "Dynamic Pricing of New Experience Goods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(4), pages 713-743, August.
    10. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 756-784, June.
    11. Man Yu & Laurens Debo & Roman Kapuscinski, 2016. "Strategic Waiting for Consumer-Generated Quality Information: Dynamic Pricing of New Experience Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 410-435, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Wang & Paul Benjamin Lowry & Xin (Robert) Luo & Han Li, 2023. "Moving Consumers from Free to Fee in Platform-Based Markets: An Empirical Study of Multiplayer Online Battle Arena Games," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 275-296, March.
    2. Jan Frederic Nerbel & Markus Kreutzer, 2023. "Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Wu, Aiqi & Song, Di & Liu, Yihui, 2022. "Platform synergy and innovation speed of SMEs: The roles of organizational design and regional environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 38-53.
    4. Xu, Yu & Hazée, Simon & So, Kevin Kam Fung & Li, K. Daisy & Malthouse, Edward Carl, 2021. "An evolutionary perspective on the dynamics of service platform ecosystems for the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 127-136.
    5. Jin Li & Gary Pisano & Yejia Xu & Feng Zhu, 2023. "Marketplace Scalability and Strategic Use of Platform Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3958-3975, July.
    6. Kazakova, E. & Sandomirskaia, M. & Suvorov, A. & Khazhgerieva, A. & Shavshin, R., 2023. "Platforms, online labor markets, and crowdsourcing. Part 1. Traditional online labor market," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 120-148.
    7. Ávila-Robinson, Alfonso & Islam, Nazrul & Sengoku, Shintaro, 2022. "Exploring the knowledge base of innovation research: Towards an emerging innovation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Wei Zhou & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Competing for Search Traffic in Query Markets: Entry Strategy, Platform Design, and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 20-12, NET Institute.
    9. Tedi Skiti & Xueming Luo & Zhijie Lin, 2022. "When More is Less: Quality and Variety Trade‐off in Sharing Economy Platforms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1817-1838, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Man Yu & Laurens Debo & Roman Kapuscinski, 2016. "Strategic Waiting for Consumer-Generated Quality Information: Dynamic Pricing of New Experience Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 410-435, February.
    2. Li, Feng & Du, Timon C. & Wei, Ying, 2023. "This is what’s in store for you: How online social learning affects product positioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Mohsen Foroughifar & David Soberman, 2021. "Is More Precise Word of Mouth Better for a High Quality Firm? ... Not Always," Papers 2105.01040, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    4. Lu Xiao & Hang Zhang & Yong Qin, 2020. "Competitive Pricing of Innovative Products with Consumers’ Social Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Davide Crapis & Bar Ifrach & Costis Maglaras & Marco Scarsini, 2017. "Monopoly Pricing in the Presence of Social Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3586-3608, November.
    6. Moscarini, Giuseppe & Ottaviani, Marco, 2001. "Price Competition for an Informed Buyer," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 457-493, December.
    7. Alexander E. Saak, 2011. "A Model of Labeling with Horizontal Differentiation and Cost Variability," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1131-1150.
    8. Dirk Bergemann & Juuso Välimäki, 2000. "Experimentation in Markets," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 67(2), pages 213-234.
    9. Krahmer, Daniel, 2003. "Entry and experimentation in oligopolistic markets for experience goods," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 1201-1213, October.
    10. Alexander E. Saak, 2012. "Dynamic Informative Advertising of New Experience Goods," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 104-135, March.
    11. Peng, Weicai & Tian, Zhongjun & Wang, Yefeng, 2020. "Price guarantee for advance selling in the presence of preorder-dependent social learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 115-122.
    12. Hiroshi Kitamura, 2010. "Capacity Expansion In Markets With Inter‐Temporal Consumption Externalities," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 127-148, June.
    13. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Subir Bose & Gerhard Orosel & Marco Ottaviani & Lise Vesterlund, 2006. "Dynamic monopoly pricing and herding," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(4), pages 910-928, December.
    15. Yang, Rui & Tang, Wansheng & Dou, Mengdi & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2021. "Pricing and investing in co-creation with customers for a duopoly," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    16. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2000. "Competing with Experience Goods," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0771, Econometric Society.
    17. Zachary Mahone & Filippo Rebessi, 2019. "Consumer Learning and Firm Dynamics," Department of Economics Working Papers 2019-08, McMaster University.
    18. Liu, Ting & Schiraldi, Pasquale, 2007. "Social learning and monopolist's product launching strategy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4921, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Ting Liu & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2012. "New product launch: herd seeking or herd preventing?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 51(3), pages 627-648, November.
    20. Krähmer, Daniel, 2002. "Entry and experimentation in oligopolistic markets for experience goods [Markteintritt und Experimentation in oligopolistischen Märkten für Erfahrungsgüter]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Processes and Governance FS IV 02-13, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:4:p:1527-1543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.