IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v46y2016i4p297-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Distribution of Coast Guard Vessels

Author

Listed:
  • Günay Uzun

    (Defense Sciences Institute, Turkish Military Academy, Ankara, Turkey)

  • Metin Dağdeviren

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey)

  • Mehmet Kabak

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey)

Abstract

A typical coast guard has complex responsibilities, subject to its multiple missions in maritime jurisdiction regions. These maritime jurisdiction regions can be partitioned into responsibility areas, and each type of coast guard vessel has a set of attributes for each responsibility area. The distribution of coast guard assets deployed in their respective areas of responsibility should be linked to the types of events occurring in these areas. The objective of this study is to determine the appropriate distribution of coast guard assets in various maritime zones; we do this by evaluating models that assign coast guard surface vessel types to missions in these maritime zones. We use the analytic network process model to compare various vessel types and determine the task-type weights for each vessel type. Weighted goal programming allows us to combine data, including the weights we derive from the use of other decision-aid tools. Our objective is to determine the best compromise solution for distributing coast guard assets into four main responsibility zones. The Turkish Coast Guard implemented the model in 2014, and decided to use it once a year prior to executing the main process in which it allocates coast guard assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Günay Uzun & Metin Dağdeviren & Mehmet Kabak, 2016. "Determining the Distribution of Coast Guard Vessels," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 297-314, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:46:y:2016:i:4:p:297-314
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2016.0852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2016.0852
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2016.0852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madjid Tavana & Matthew D. Bailey & Timothy E. Busch, 2008. "A multi-criteria vehicle-target allocation assessment model for network-centric Joint Air Operations," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 235-254.
    2. Sarkis, Joseph & Sundarraj, R. P., 2002. "Hub location at Digital Equipment Corporation: A comprehensive analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 336-347, March.
    3. Jason R. W. Merrick & John R. Harrald, 2007. "Making Decisions About Safety in US Ports and Waterways," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 240-252, June.
    4. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
    5. Meade, Laura & Sarkis, Joseph, 1998. "Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 201-215, September.
    6. Bo An & Fernando Ordóñez & Milind Tambe & Eric Shieh & Rong Yang & Craig Baldwin & Joseph DiRenzo & Kathryn Moretti & Ben Maule & Garrett Meyer, 2013. "A Deployed Quantal Response-Based Patrol Planning System for the U.S. Coast Guard," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 400-420, October.
    7. Nathaniel D. Bastian & Pat McMurry & Lawrence V. Fulton & Paul M. Griffin & Shisheng Cui & Thor Hanson & Sharan Srinivas, 2015. "The AMEDD Uses Goal Programming to Optimize Workforce Planning Decisions," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 305-324, August.
    8. Darby-Dowman, K. & Fink, R. K. & Mitra, G. & Smith, J. W., 1995. "An intelligent system for US Coast Guard cutter scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 574-585, December.
    9. Michael R. Wagner & Zinovy Radovilsky, 2012. "Optimizing Boat Resources at the U.S. Coast Guard: Deterministic and Stochastic Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1035-1049, October.
    10. Kent Everingham & Gary Polaski & Frederick Riedlin & Michael Shirk & Vinayak Deshpande & Ananth V. Iyer, 2008. "Operations Research Enhances Supply Chain Management at the US Coast Guard Aircraft Repair and Supply Center," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 61-75, February.
    11. Stewart, TJ, 1992. "A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(5-6), pages 569-586.
    12. Gerald G. Brown & Robert F. Dell & Robert A. Farmer, 1996. "Scheduling Coast Guard District Cutters," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 59-72, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aditya Kamat & Saket Shanker & Akhilesh Barve & Kamalakanta Muduli & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Uncovering interrelationships between barriers to unmanned aerial vehicles in humanitarian logistics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1134-1160, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul A. Chircop & Timothy J. Surendonk & Menkes H. L. van den Briel & Toby Walsh, 2022. "On routing and scheduling a fleet of resource-constrained vessels to provide ongoing continuous patrol coverage," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 723-760, May.
    2. Marielle Christiansen & Kjetil Fagerholt & David Ronen, 2004. "Ship Routing and Scheduling: Status and Perspectives," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Michael R. Wagner & Zinovy Radovilsky, 2012. "Optimizing Boat Resources at the U.S. Coast Guard: Deterministic and Stochastic Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1035-1049, October.
    4. Javier Salmerón & Jeffrey Kline & Greta Spitz Densham, 2011. "Optimizing Schedules for Maritime Humanitarian Cooperative Engagements from a United States Navy Sea Base," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 238-253, June.
    5. Amin Akbari & Ronald Pelot & H. A. Eiselt, 2018. "A modular capacitated multi-objective model for locating maritime search and rescue vessels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 3-28, August.
    6. Erdogmus, Senol & Kapanoglu, Muzaffer & Koc, Eylem, 2005. "Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 391-399, November.
    7. Erdogmus, Senol & Aras, Haydar & Koç, Eylem, 2006. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 269-279, June.
    8. de Almeida, Jonatas Araujo & Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas & de Almeida-Filho, Adiel Teixeira, 2016. "A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoffAuthor-Name: de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 179-191.
    9. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    10. Tofallis, C., 1996. "Improving discernment in DEA using profiling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 361-364, June.
    11. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Sarkis, Joseph & Wang, Xuping, 2016. "Assessing green supply chain practices in the Ghanaian mining industry: A framework and evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 325-341.
    12. Nuria Padilla-Garrido & Francisco Aguado-Correa & Virginia Cortijo-Gallego & Francisca López-Camacho, 2014. "Multicriteria Decision Making in Health Care Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Microsoft Excel," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(7), pages 931-935, October.
    13. Wang, Chao & Lim, Ming K & Zhao, Longfeng & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Chien, Chen-Fu & Lev, Benjamin, 2020. "The evolution of Omega-The International Journal of Management Science over the past 40 years: A bibliometric overview," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    14. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    15. Xufeng Cui & Ting Cai & Wei Deng & Rui Zheng & Yuehua Jiang & Hongjie Bao, 2022. "Indicators for Evaluating High-Quality Agricultural Development: Empirical Study from Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1101-1127, December.
    16. S. Saffarzadeh & A. Hadi-Vencheh & A. Jamshidi, 2019. "An Interval Based Score Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problems," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1667-1687, September.
    17. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Solomon, Anthony & Wishart, Nicole & Dublish, Sandipa, 1998. "Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 507-529, June.
    18. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wu, Pei-Ju & Chia, Kai-Chieh, 2010. "A hybrid fuzzy integral decision-making model for locating manufacturing centers in China: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 63-73, January.
    19. Chowdary, Boppana V. & Slomp, Jannes, 2002. "Production planning under dynamic product environment: a multi-objective goal programming approach," Research Report 02A12, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Jingbo Huang & Jiting Li & Yonghao Du & Yanjie Song & Jian Wu & Feng Yao & Pei Wang, 2023. "Research of a Multi-Level Organization Human Resource Network Optimization Model and an Improved Late Acceptance Hill Climbing Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:46:y:2016:i:4:p:297-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.