IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2018i2p37-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theories of Regulation in the Context of Modern Practice of Accounting Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Oleh Pasko

    (Sumy National Agrarian University, Sumy, Ukraine)

Abstract

Today, the trend of decentralization of regulation is acquiring new signs, weakening the role of the state in this process. Therefore, a study of the nature of changes and problems of regulation can be useful, both for regulators and for the academic community. The purpose of the article is to analyze the theories of regulation, the rationale for the need to regulate accounting and the model of its regulation at the present stage. The analysis of four theories of accounting regulation was carried out: 1) the theory of public interest; 2) the capture theory (or private interest theory) 3) the economic regulation theory; 4) the ideological theory of regulation in the context of the role of individual actors and different configurations of the participation of the state, market, society, and regulated communities in them. It was proved that inadequate production through external externalities is an argument in favor of the need to regulate accounting and financial reporting standards. It was revealed that at present the most popular theory of accounting regulation is the theory of capture, with elements of ideological regulation theory that have become the standard of accounting regulation. In studies devoted to the analysis of the application of capture theory in practice, the dichotomy between the level of data received by the regulator from the regulated community and the propensity of the regulator to capture dominate. It was proved that, in opposition to the interests of capital groups in the political system, the focus on public interest should be restored. It was determined, that the practical application of the capture theory should be based on a zone of regulatory effectiveness, in which a centrist approach to the development of regulatory policy is created. It facilitates the ability of regulators to create links and share information, while forcing the regulator to act in the public interest, and not in the interest of narrow groups that they should regulate.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleh Pasko, 2018. "Theories of Regulation in the Context of Modern Practice of Accounting Regulation," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 37-46, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2018:i:2:p:37-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/569-teorii-regulyuvannya-v-konteksti-suchasnoi-praktiki-regulyuvannya-buhgalterskogo-obliku.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayne M Godfrey & Ian A Langfield-Smith, 2005. "Regulatory Capture in the Globalisation of Accounting Standards," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(11), pages 1975-1993, November.
    2. S.P. Kothari & Karthik Ramanna & Douglas J. Skinner, 2009. "Implications for GAAP from an Analysis of Positive Research in Accounting," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-137, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2010.
    3. Kozloski, Thomas & Meckfessel, Michele & Moehrle, Stephen R. & Williams, Thomas, 2016. "Developments in accounting regulation: A synthesis and annotated bibliography of evidence and commentary in the 2014 academic literature," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 22-41.
    4. Ernesto Dal Bo´, 2006. "Regulatory Capture: A Review," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 203-225, Summer.
    5. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    6. Djankov, Simeon & Glaeser, Edward & La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei, 2003. "The new comparative economics," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 595-619, December.
    7. Oleh Pasko, 2017. "Perception of Accounting and Auditing Standards by Users in Context of Formation of Institutional Openness in Regulation," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 68-75, March.
    8. M B Adams & G D Tower, 1994. "Theories of Regulation: Some Reflections on the Statutory Supervision of Insurance Companies in Anglo-American Countries," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 19(2), pages 156-177, April.
    9. Nurunnabi, Mohammad, 2014. "‘Does accounting regulation matter?’: An experience of international financial reporting standards implementation in an emerging country," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 230-238.
    10. Laughlin, Richard, 2007. "Critical reflections on research approaches, accounting regulation and the regulation of accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 271-289.
    11. Black, Julia, 2002. "Critical reflections on regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35985, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Richard A. Posner, 1974. "Theories of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 5(2), pages 335-358, Autumn.
    13. Matthew V. Tilling & Carol A. Tilt, 2010. "The edge of legitimacy," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 55-81, January.
    14. Nurunnabi, Mohammad, 2014. "The role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in a developing economy: Implications for IFRS," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 413-424.
    15. Zeff, Stephen A., 2007. "Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 290-302.
    16. Koop, Christel & Lodge, Martin, 2017. "What is regulation? An interdisciplinary concept analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62135, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Kothari, S.P. & Ramanna, Karthik & Skinner, Douglas J., 2010. "Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 246-286, December.
    18. Roland Königsgruber, 2013. "Expertise-based lobbying and accounting regulation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 1009-1025, November.
    19. Moehrle, Stephen R. & Franzen, Laurel & Meckfessel, Michele & Reynolds-Moehrle, Jennifer, 2016. "Developments in accounting regulation: A synthesis and annotated bibliography of evidence and commentary in the 2015 academic literature," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 96-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christensen, Hans B. & Liu, Lisa Yao & Maffett, Mark, 2020. "Proactive financial reporting enforcement and shareholder wealth," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).
    2. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    3. Hans B. Christensen & Valeri V. Nikolaev, 2017. "Contracting on GAAP Changes: Large Sample Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1021-1050, December.
    4. Matt Pinnuck & Kevin Stevenson, 2021. "Enhancing the Interface between Standard‐setters and Academic Research," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 169-185, September.
    5. Brandon Gipper & Brett J Lombardi & Douglas J Skinner, 2013. "The politics of accounting standard-setting: A review of empirical research," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 38(3), pages 523-551, December.
    6. Jannis Bischof & Holger Daske & Christoph J. Sextroh, 2020. "Why Do Politicians Intervene in Accounting Regulation? The Role of Ideology and Special Interests," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 589-642, June.
    7. Baum, Donald R. & Cooper, Rachel & Lusk-Stover, Oni, 2018. "Regulating market entry of low-cost private schools in Sub-Saharan Africa: Towards a theory of private education regulation," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 100-112.
    8. Carol A. Heimer & Elsinore Kuo, 2021. "Subterranean successes: Durable regulation and regulatory endowments," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 63-82, November.
    9. Miguel Duro & Jonas Heese & Gaizka Ormazabal, 2019. "The effect of enforcement transparency: Evidence from SEC comment-letter reviews," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 780-823, September.
    10. Chen, Rong & Geng, Heng (Griffin) & Lin, Hai & Nguyen, Phuong Thi Ly, 2021. "Liquidity, informed trading, and a market surveillance system: Evidence from the Vietnamese stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Lisa Baudot & Robin W. Roberts & Dana M. Wallace, 2017. "An Examination of the U.S. Public Accounting Profession’s Public Interest Discourse and Actions in Federal Policy Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 203-220, May.
    12. Evgeny Yakovlev & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2007. "Deregulation of Business," Working Papers w0097, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    13. Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2011. "Anti-Corruption Policy in Theories of Sector Regulation," Chapters, in: Susan Rose-Ackerman & Tina Søreide (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Volume Two, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Lee, Changyen & Cheng, Chun-Fa & Chuang, Min-Ta & Hsu, Wei-Chieh & Chen, Yen-Hung & Cheng, Kuo-Tai, 2018. "How transparency and accountability matter in regulating the Taiwan Water Supply Corporation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 50-58.
    15. Riccardo Macchioni & Alessandra Allini & Martina Prisco, 2022. "The role of the Big Four audit firms and the legal system in non-GAAP comparability," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 79-116.
    16. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    17. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    18. Mountain, Bruce R., 2019. "Ownership, regulation, and financial disparity: The case of electricity distribution in Australia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Ando, Amy, 1998. "Delay on the Path to the Endangered Species List: Do Costs and Benefits Matter," RFF Working Paper Series dp-97-43-rev, Resources for the Future.
    20. William C. Mitchell, 1990. "Interest Groups: Economic Perspectives and Contributions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(1), pages 85-108, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    theories of regulation; accounting; regulator; capture theory; public interest; regulated community;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2018:i:2:p:37-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.