IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v37y2005i11p1975-1993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory Capture in the Globalisation of Accounting Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Jayne M Godfrey
  • Ian A Langfield-Smith

Abstract

The Australian Financial Reporting Council recently shocked the world business community by unexpectedly announcing a change in the nation's approach to global-accounting-standards development. The change involved switching from ensuring consistency of Australian accounting standards with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) developed by the International Accounting Standards Board to outright adoption of IFRSs by 2005. At the time of the announcement, Australia had the most developed international harmonisation programme of any country with a well-developed financial reporting system. Events surrounding the change demonstrate how political the accounting standard-setting process can be as it continues to receive front-page media attention, and as it provides a platform in parliamentary and electoral debate. In the meantime, the US role in the global accounting standard-setting arena has moved through phases of indifference to potential active dominance, and European influences have waxed and waned. We examine whether swings in political and regulatory influences that occur when globalisation becomes a national and international goal are explained by regulatory capture theory. We also address the extent to which a subset of a single nation's regulatory system plays a key role in a series of larger national and international games. Drawing upon experiences in Australia, the United States, and the European Union, we identify political influences on initiatives to reform accounting-standard-setting environments, policies, and processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayne M Godfrey & Ian A Langfield-Smith, 2005. "Regulatory Capture in the Globalisation of Accounting Standards," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(11), pages 1975-1993, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:11:p:1975-1993
    DOI: 10.1068/a3790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3790
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Collett & Jayne Godfrey & Sue Hrasky, 1998. "Standard-setting in Australia: Implications of Recent Radical Reform Proposals," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 8(16), pages 9-17, November.
    2. Stephen Haswell & Jill Mckinnon, 2003. "IASB Standards for Australia by 2005: Catapult or Trojan Horse?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(29), pages 8-16, March.
    3. Bryan Howieson & Ian Langfield-Smith, 2003. "The FRC AND Accounting Standard-Setting: Should I Still Call Australia Home?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(29), pages 17-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oleh Pasko, 2018. "Theories of Regulation in the Context of Modern Practice of Accounting Regulation," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 37-46, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryan Howieson & Ian Langfield-Smith, 2003. "The FRC AND Accounting Standard-Setting: Should I Still Call Australia Home?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(29), pages 17-26, March.
    2. Michael Bradbury & Tony Zijl, 2006. "Due Process and the Adoption of IFRS IN New Zealand," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 86-94, July.
    3. Stephen Haswell & Ian Langfield-Smith, 2008. "Fifty-Seven Serious Defects in ‘Australian’ IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(1), pages 46-62, March.
    4. Keryn Chalmers & Greg Clinch & Jayne M Godfrey, 2011. "Changes in value relevance of accounting information upon IFRS adoption: Evidence from Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 36(2), pages 151-173, August.
    5. Indra Abeysekera, 2006. "Accounting Meets Politics: Theoretical Interpretation of Key Events (1940–2003) of the Accounting Profession in Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(38), pages 66-74, March.
    6. Josef Jílek, 2016. "‘Fair Value’ of Core Deposits in the EU version of IFRS: A Critical Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(3), pages 312-325, September.
    7. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    8. Irvine, Helen, 2008. "The global institutionalization of financial reporting: The case of the United Arab Emirates," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 125-142.
    9. Stephen Haswell, 2006. "Over-Complexity in Accounting Standards and the Emerging Duopoly of US GAAP AND IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 49-59, July.
    10. Andrew, Jane & Cortese, Corinne, 2013. "Free market environmentalism and the neoliberal project: The case of the Climate Disclosure Standards Board," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 397-409.
    11. Parmod Chand & Lorne Cummings, 2008. "The Political and Unstable Nature of the IASB's ‘Stable Platform’: Post-Convergence Australian Experience," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(3), pages 175-184, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:11:p:1975-1993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.