IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i5p719-d97214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimum Returns from Greenhouse Vegetables under Water Quality and Risk Constraints in the United Arab Emirates

Author

Listed:
  • Eihab Fathelrahman

    (Department of Agribusiness and Consumer Sciences, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 009713, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mohamed Gheblawi

    (Department of Agribusiness and Consumer Sciences, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 009713, United Arab Emirates)

  • Safdar Muhammad

    (Department of Agribusiness and Consumer Sciences, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 009713, United Arab Emirates)

  • Emily Dunn

    (Department of Agribusiness and Consumer Sciences, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 009713, United Arab Emirates)

  • James C. Ascough

    (USDA-ARS, 1400 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington DC, 20250, USA
    The fifth author is deceased.)

  • Timothy R. Green

    (USDA, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Water Management and Systems Research Unit, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA)

Abstract

Greenhouses have been used in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to produce vegetables that contribute toward UAE food security, including offering fresh vegetable produce in the off-season. However, to manage such greenhouses, farmers face both technical and environmental limitations (i.e., high water scarcity), as well as vegetable market price instability. The objective of this study is to explore tradeoffs between returns (i.e., gross margin) of selected vegetables (tomato, pepper, and cucumber), risk (deviation from gross margin means), and an environmental constraint (water salinity) using a unique target MOTAD (minimization of total absolute deviations) approach to support UAE farmer decision-making processes. The optimal target MOTAD solution included all three vegetables and no corner solution. The results showed tradeoffs between returns and risks, and confirmed that product diversification reduces overall risk. The analysis was consistent with farmer perceptions based on a survey of 78 producers in the region. The search for the optimal mix of vegetable production under UAE greenhouse conditions revealed that reduction in tomato production should be offset by an increase in cucumber production while maintaining a constant level of pepper production. In other words, risk is reduced as cucumber production increases due to the high level of tomato and lettuce price volatility as the alternative to cucumber. The results also demonstrated the importance of the water salinity environmental constraint, as it was found to have a positive marginal value in the optimal vegetable mix solution (i.e., important factor). Thus the optimal solution was highly sensitive to changes in the crop water salinity constraint. The study results also demonstrate that the target MOTAD approach is a suitable optimization methodology. As a practical approach, a decision-maker in the UAE can consider gross margin (total revenue-variable costs) maximization with risk and water quality constraints to find the optimal vegetable product mix under greenhouse conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eihab Fathelrahman & Mohamed Gheblawi & Safdar Muhammad & Emily Dunn & James C. Ascough & Timothy R. Green, 2017. "Optimum Returns from Greenhouse Vegetables under Water Quality and Risk Constraints in the United Arab Emirates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:719-:d:97214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Wencong C. & Xi, Aiqin & Ye, Jian, 2006. "Modeling Risk Behavior of Agricultural Production in Chinese Small Households," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25656, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Berbel, J., 1993. "Risk programming in agricultural systems: A multiple criteria analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 275-288.
    3. Mapp, Harry P., Jr., 1999. "Impact Of Production Changes On Income And Environmental Risk In The Southern High Plains," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Novak, James L. & Mitchell, Charles C., Jr. & Crews, Jerry R., 1990. "Risk And Sustainable Agriculture: A Target-Motad Analysis Of The 92-Year "Old Rotation"," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Novak, James L. & Mitchell, Charles C. & Crews, Jerry R., 1990. "Risk and Sustainable Agriculture: A Target-Motad Analysis of the 92-Year “Old Rotationâ€," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 145-154, July.
    6. Zimet, David J. & Spreen, Thomas H., 1986. "A Target Motad Analysis of a Crop and Livestock Farm in Jefferson County, Florida," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 175-186, December.
    7. Akram Masoud Haddad & Yousef Shahwan, 2012. "Optimization agricultural production under financial risk of water constraint in the Jordan Valley," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(11), pages 1375-1385, April.
    8. Mapp, Harry P., 1999. "Impact of Production Changes on Income and Environmental Risk in the Southern High Plains," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 263-273, August.
    9. Parton, Kevin A. & Cumming, Robert J., 1990. "An Application of Target-MOTAD Programming to the Analysis of Downside Business and Financial Risk on Farms," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(01), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdul Munaf Mohamed Irfeey & Mohamed M. M. Najim & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Abou Traore, 2023. "Groundwater Pollution Impact on Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Artur Nemś & Magdalena Nemś & Klaudia Świder, 2018. "Analysis of the Possibilities of Using a Heat Pump for Greenhouse Heating in Polish Climatic Conditions—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekman, Sone, 2002. "Cost-Effective Farm-Level Nitrogen Abatement in the Presence of Environmental and Economic Risk," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24860, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Harris, Thomas R. & Seung, Chang K. & Narayanan, Rangesan, 2001. "Targeting Economic Diversification: An Application of Target MOTAD Procedures," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 31(2), pages 197-215, Fall.
    3. Juan, J. A. de & Tarjuelo, J. M. & Valiente, M. & Garcia, P., 1996. "Model for optimal cropping patterns within the farm based on crop water production functions and irrigation uniformity I: Development of a decision model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-2), pages 115-143, June.
    4. Yuanhe Yu & Liang Wang & Jinkuo Lin & Zijun Li, 2022. "Optimizing Agricultural Input and Production for Different Types of at-Risk Peasant Households: An Empirical Study of Typical Counties in the Yimeng Mountain Area of Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. John W. Cary & Roger L. Wilkinson, 1997. "Perceived Profitability And Farmers‘ Conservation Behaviour," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 13-21, January.
    6. Kingwell, Ross, 1996. "Programming models of farm supply response: The impact of specification errors," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 307-324.
    7. Foster, Thomas H., 1991. "Farm Level Impacts Of Reduced Chemical Use On Southern Agriculture: Discussion," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-3, July.
    8. Edison, Andy Mulyana & Jie, Ferry & Parton, Kevin A., 2011. "The Analysis Of Supply Response Of Rice Under Risk In Jambi Province," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 113736, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Soto-Silva, Wladimir E. & Nadal-Roig, Esteve & González-Araya, Marcela C. & Pla-Aragones, Lluis M., 2016. "Operational research models applied to the fresh fruit supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 345-355.
    10. Maynard, Leigh J. & Harper, Jayson K. & Hoffman, Lynn D., 1997. "Impact Of Risk Preferences On Crop Rotation Choice," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-9, April.
    11. Gebremedhin, Berhanu & Schwab, Gerald, 1998. "The Economic Importance Of Crop Rotation Systems: Evidence From The Literature," Staff Paper Series 11690, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Marousek, Gerald & Stodick, Leroy & Schimmel, Joe, 1990. "Production And Marketing Alternatives In The Beef Cattle Industry With Risk Considerations," A.E. Research Series 305064, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    13. Prevatt, J. Walter & Bauer, Larry L. & Kaiser, Eddie H. & Rathwell, P. James, 1992. "Measuring The Effect Of Capital Structure And Seasonality On Expected Returns And Risk: The Fresh Market Vegetable Case," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-8, July.
    14. Gali, Jyothi & Brown, Colin G., 2000. "Assisting decision-making in Queensland barley production through chance constrained programming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(2), pages 1-19.
    15. Gomez-Limon, J. A. & Berbel, J., 2000. "Multicriteria analysis of derived water demand functions: a Spanish case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 49-72, January.
    16. Berbel, Julio & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos, 2015. "Farmer’s subjective elicited water response function for intensive olives and compromise programming method for irrigation supply decision," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(02).
    17. Marousek, Gerald & Stodick, Leroy, 1991. "Economics of Alternative Beef Cattle Managment/Marketing Systems," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321467, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Loyce, C. & Rellier, J. P. & Meynard, J. M., 2002. "Management planning for winter wheat with multiple objectives (1): The BETHA system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 9-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:719-:d:97214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.